All Cases

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 6: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 PRANAY SAKHARAM JARANDE ..APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 994 OF 2024 AND INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 PRATIMA PRAMOD AGHAM ..APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS Adv. Vinayak Pandit i/b Adv. Ajinkya Udane for the Appellant. Adv. Sankalan Das i/b Adv. Pranali Kakade for the Respondent. Ms. Sangeeta D. Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : APRIL 4, 2024 P.C. : By consent, stand over to 30/04/2024. Interim order already in operation to continue till then. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 10: Diksha Rane 913. APEAL 244-24.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244/2024 PRANAY SAKHARAM JARANDE ..APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994/2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996/2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244/2024 PRATIMA PRAMOD AGHAM ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS ------------ Adv. Ajinkya M. Udane for the applicant. Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for the State. Adv. Pranali Kakade a/w. Adv. Sankalan Das for the respondent no.2. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : APRIL 24, 2024. P.C. : 1. List this appeal on 30/4/2024 along with Criminal Appeal No.632/2021. 2. Advocate Pranali Kakade is requested to appear on behalf of the appellant/victim in Criminal Appeal No.632/2021. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 13: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.632 OF 2021 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Pratima Pramod Agham ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents Ms. Pranali Kakade appointed Advocate for the Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and for Respondent No.2 in Appeal no.244 of 2024. ________ Mr. Abhay Anturkar a/w Mr. Ranjit D. Shinde, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni i/b Mr. Ajinkya Udane for Respondent in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Appellant in Appeal No.244 of 2024. Mr. A.R. Metkari, APP for Respondent/State in both Appeals. Ms. Pratima P. Agham – through Video Conferencing - Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Respondent No.2 in Appeal No.244 of 2024 __________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 19 JUNE 2024. P.C.: 1 Ms. Pratima Pramod Agham has appeared through video conferencing. Her identity is confirmed by Ms. Kakade who has placed on record copy of the Adhar card. Ms. Agham confirms the position that she does not wish to press accusation against the accused. She would pray for withdrawal of Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021 is disposed of as withdrawn. 2 So far as Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is concerned, the same seeks pre-arrest bail in respect of Pranay Sakharam Jarande by challenging the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by the learned Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. The Appellant is already under interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 10 December 2020. In view of the willingness expressed by the first informant not to press the accusation against the accused, in my view interim protection granted in favour of the Appellant deserves to be made absolute. Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is accordingly allowed by setting aside the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. Interim protection granted by this Court on 10 December 2020 is made absolute. 3 In view of the disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024, the Interim Application Nos.996 of 2024 and 994 of 2024 do not survive and the same are also accordingly disposed of. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 ________ Ms. Pranali Kakade appointed Advocate for the Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and for Respondent No.2 in Appeal no.244 of 2024. Mr. Abhay Anturkar a/w Mr. Ranjit D. Shinde, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni i/b Mr. Ajinkya Udane for Respondent in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Appellant in Appeal No.244 of 2024. Mr. A.R. Metkari, APP for Respondent/State in both Appeals. Ms. Pratima P. Agham – through Video Conferencing - Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Respondent No.2 in Appeal No.244 of 2024 __________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 19 JUNE 2024. P.C.: 1 Ms. Pratima Pramod Agham has appeared through video conferencing. Her identity is confirmed by Ms. Kakade who has placed on record copy of the Adhar card. Ms. Agham confirms the position that she does not wish to press accusation against the accused. She would pray for withdrawal of Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021 is disposed of as withdrawn. 2 So far as Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is concerned, the same seeks pre-arrest bail in respect of Pranay Sakharam Jarande by challenging the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by the learned Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. The Appellant is already under interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 10 December 2020. In view of the willingness expressed by the first informant not to press the accusation against the accused, in my view interim protection granted in favour of the Appellant deserves to be made absolute. Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is accordingly allowed by setting aside the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. Interim protection granted by this Court on 10 December 2020 is made absolute. 3 In view of the disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024, the Interim Application Nos.996 of 2024 and 994 of 2024 do not survive and the same are also accordingly disposed of. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) katkam Page No. 2 of 2 SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2024.07.23 18:15:30 +0530

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ....Appellant V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Ms. Pranali Kakade appointed Advocate for the Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and for Respondent No.2 in Appeal no.244 of 2024. Mr. Abhay Anturkar a/w Mr. Ranjit D. Shinde, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni i/b Mr. Ajinkya Udane for Respondent in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Appellant in Appeal No.244 of 2024. Mr. A.R. Metkari, APP for Respondent/State in both Appeals. Ms. Pratima P. Agham – through Video Conferencing - Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Respondent No.2 in Appeal No.244 of 2024 __________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 19 JUNE 2024. P.C.: 1 Ms. Pratima Pramod Agham has appeared through video conferencing. Her identity is confirmed by Ms. Kakade who has placed on record copy of the Adhar card. Ms. Agham confirms the position that she does not wish to press accusation against the accused. She would pray for withdrawal of Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021 is disposed of as withdrawn. 2 So far as Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is concerned, the same seeks pre-arrest bail in respect of Pranay Sakharam Jarande by challenging the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by the learned Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. The Appellant is already under interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 10 December 2020. In view of the willingness expressed by the first informant not to press the accusation against the accused, in my view interim protection granted in favour of the Appellant deserves to be made absolute. Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is accordingly allowed by setting aside the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. Interim protection granted by this Court on 10 December 2020 is made absolute. 3 In view of the disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024, the Interim Application Nos.996 of 2024 and 994 of 2024 do not survive and the same are also accordingly disposed of. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2024.11.14 20:10:12 +0530 katkam Page No. 2 of 2

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ….Appellant V/s. Lata Sakharam Jarande and Ors. ….Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ….Appellant V/s. Lata Sakharam Jarande and Ors. ….Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 996 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 994 OF 2024 (FOR INTERVENTION) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 Pratima Pramod Agham ….Applicant/ Intervenor IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Pranay Sakharam Jarande ….Appellant V/s. State of Maharashtra ….Respondents ___Page No. 1 of 2 ___ 23 July 2024 Ms. Maitreyee Garade a/w. Mr. Vinayak Pandit i/by. Mr. Ajinkya Udane, for the Appellant. __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ Mr. Ashok R. Metkari, APP for Respondent-State. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Dated : 23 July 2024. P.C. : Office has suo-moto placed the above appeals on board seeking speaking to the minutes of the order dated 19 June 2024. It appears that name of the Appellant ' Pranay Sakharam Jarande' is not reflected in Criminal Appeal No. 244 of 2024. The corrections be carried out in the order and the order be read accordingly. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2024.07.23 18:02:20 +0530

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ….Appellant V/s. Lata Sakharam Jarande and Ors. ….Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ….Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ….Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 996 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 994 OF 2024 (FOR INTERVENTION) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 Pratima Pramod Agham ….Applicant/ Intervenor IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Pranay Sakharam Jarande ….Appellant V/s. State of Maharashtra ….Respondents ___Page No. 1 of 2 ___ 23 July 2024 Ms. Maitreyee Garade a/w. Mr. Vinayak Pandit i/by. Mr. Ajinkya Udane, for the Appellant. __________________________________________________ Mr. Ashok R. Metkari, APP for Respondent-State. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Dated : 23 July 2024. P.C. : Office has suo-moto placed the above appeals on board seeking speaking to the minutes of the order dated 19 June 2024. It appears that name of the Appellant ' Pranay Sakharam Jarande' is not reflected in Criminal Appeal No. 244 of 2024. The corrections be carried out in the order and the order be read accordingly. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Note : Corrections are carried out in cause-title only pursuant to speaking to minutes order dated 14 November 2024. NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2024.11.14 18:15:25 +0530 Digitally ___Page No. 2 of 2 ___ 23 July 2024

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ....Appellant V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 ________ Ms. Maitreyee Garad i/b Mr. Ajinkya Udane for the Appellant. Ms. Shilpa K. Gajare-Dhumal, APP for Respondent/State. __________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 14 NOVEMBER 2024. P.C.: 1 Office has suo-moto placed the above Appeals on board seeking speaking to the minutes of the orders dated 19 June 2024 and 23 July 2024. katkam Page No. 1 of 2 2 It appears that name of the Respondents 'The State of Maharashtra & Anr.' in the cause title is not reflected in Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024. The corrections be carried out in the orders and the orders be read accordingly. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 OF 2014 Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. P. M. Palshikar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 07 APRIL, 2014 P.C.: The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Labour Court, Mumbai has not considered the stand of the Petitioner that 5 th Pay Commission, upon which the reliance was sought by the Respondent, was made applicable only after execution of the agreement dated 25 June 2004 and the Respondent had obtained voluntary retirement scheme on 31 May 2004 and therefore, it was not applicable to him. Issue notice to the Respondent, returnable on 5 May 2014. Till further orders, the Respondent will not take coercive steps based on the impugned order. (N.M. JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 29: Sequeira IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 of 2014 The Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation. .. Petitioner Vs. Shri Balkrishna Ganpati Salunkhe. .. Respondent Mr.P.M.Palshikar, for the Petitioner. Mr.Vaibhav Gaikwad, for the Respondent. CORAM: N.M.Jamdar, J. Monday 23 November, 2015 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The Petitioner Federation challenges the order dated 3 August 2013 passed by Labour Court, Mumbai allowing application filed by the Respondentmember under Section 33 (c)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court has accepted the claim of the Respondent No.1 for entitlement of difference and wages for the period from 1 June 2003 to 31 May 2004 after applicability of recommendation from 5th Pay Commission and certain other findings. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that some employees of the Federation who were not in the category of workmen had filed Writ petition No.4274 of 2009 and 4267 of 2009 with the Aurangabad bench of this Court and the Division bench had granted identical relief which is granted by the Labour Court in the present case. The learned counsel submitted that the Federation has challenged the decision of the Division bench by way of Civil Appeal Nos.4521 and 4522 of 2013 and the Apex Court has admitted and granted leave and unconditionally stayed the operation of the orders. Copies of the orders are placed on record. In view of this position, Rule. Respondent waives service. The interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). Liberty to apply after the decision of the Apex Court is rendered. (N.M.Jamdar, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3736 OF 2021 M/s.Sovereign Tech } Engineering Services Private } Limited and Anr. } Petitioner versus Maharashtra Industrial } Development Corporation } and Ors. } Respondents Mr.P.S.Dani-Senior Advocate i/b. Mr.E.A.Sasi for the petitioner. Mr.B.V.Samant-AGP for respondent nos. 4 to 8 (State). Mr.Jitendra jagtap for respondent no.9. CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE :- AUGUST 5, 2021 PC :- 1. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 2nd September 2021. Mr.Samant, learned AGP waives notice for respondent nos. 4 to 8 and Mr.Jagtap, learned advocate waives notice for respondent no.9. 2. Reply affidavit may be filed by the respondents within 3 (three) weeks; rejoinder thereto, if any, may be filed by 1 (one) week thereafter. SALUNKE J V Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2021.08.06 10:48:04 +0530 (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISIDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3736 OF 2021 M/s. Sovereign Tech Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) & Ors. .. Respondents Ms. Meghna Khatri i/by Mr. E. A. Sasi for petitioners. Ms. Tanvi Doshi i/by Little & Co. for respondent nos.1 to 3 (MIDC). Mr. B. V. Samant, AGP for respondent nos.4 to 8-State. Mr. Jitendra P. Jagtap for respondent no.9. Mr. R. V. Govilkar a/w Mr. Anil D. Yadav for respondent nos.10 & 11. C0RAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 9, 2021 PC : Registry to verify and place the writ petition before the appropriate Bench. (M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Digitally signed by PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2021.09.09 19:58:31 +0530

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 362 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8569 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 362 OF 2024 Satish Murlidhar Inamdar & Anr. … Appellants Versus Mr. Amogh Sawant the Sole Proprietor of M/s. Amogh Swant & M/s. Adit Enterprises and Ors. … Respondents WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 364 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8570 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 364 OF 2024 Swati Shamsundar Panjri … Appellant Versus Mr. Amogh Sawant the Sole Proprietor of M/s. Amogh Swant & M/s. Adit Enterprises and Ors. … Respondents WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 367 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8574 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 367 OF 2024 Sunil Rohidas Kamthe and Anr. … Appellants Versus Mr. Amogh Sawant the Sole Proprietor of M/s. Amogh Swant & M/s. Adit Enterprises and Ors. … Respondents 11:22:37 +0530 WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 366 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8572 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 366 OF 2024 Kamal Bharat Nighut … Appellant Versus Mr. Amogh Sawant the Sole Proprietor of M/s. Amogh Swant & M/s. Adit Enterprises and Ors. … Respondents WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 363 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 13559 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 363 OF 2024 Ishwar Badrilal Chorotiya and Anr. … Appellants Versus Mr. Amogh Sawant the Sole Proprietor of M/s. Amogh Swant & M/s. Adit Enterprises and Ors. … Respondents WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 365 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8571 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 365 OF 2024 Gopi Gangaram Kadam … Appellant Versus Mr. Amogh Sawant the Sole Proprietor of M/s. Amogh Swant & M/s. Adit Enterprises and Ors. … Respondents WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 368 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8575 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 368 OF 2024 Savita Nandkumar Nijasure and Anr. … Appellants Versus Mr. Amogh Sawant the Sole Proprietor of M/s. Amogh Swant & M/s. Adit Enterprises and Ors. … Respondents WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 369 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8577 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 369 OF 2024 Nandkumar Murlidhar Inamdar and Anr. … Appellants Versus Mr. Amogh Sawant the Sole Proprietor of M/s. Amogh Swant & M/s. Adit Enterprises and Ors. … Respondents Mr. K. S. Patil, for the Appellants. Ms. Manisha Prajapati i/b Dhiren H. Shah, for Respondent No.2. ….. ..... Ms. Nikita Ghungarde i/b Neha Shah, for Respondent No. 5. Ms. Seena Rawade, for the Respondent-BMC. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 12th JUNE, 2024. P.C. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. 2 Heard. 3 On 7th May, 2024, the following order was passed; ". Heard. Issue notice to the respondents. Ms. Vidya Nair, learned counsel waives service of notice of behalf of respondent No.2 and Ms. Neha Shah, learned counsel waives service of notice of behalf of respondent No.5, and seek time to take instructions and file reply affidavit. Stand over to 12 June 2024. In the meanwhile, till the next date, parties to maintain the status-quo." 3 Learned Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 5 inform that they have already filed reply. Learned Counsel for the appellant admits receipt of the copies of reply. 4 List on 4 th July, 2024. 5 The status-quo order will continue to operate till the next date. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]