All Cases

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.303 OF 2009 IN APPLICATION NO.4486 OF 2008 Ashutosh Dnyaneshwar Agashe Vs. State of Mah) Office Notes, Office Court's Court's or Judge's orders. s orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Nr 01 0 0 1 Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr. Counsel, with Mr S.V.Kotwal Advocate, for the applicant. Mrs.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 07/07/2009 PC: Heard Mr. Shirish Gupte, learned senior counsel for the applicant and Mrs Shinde, learned APP, for the respondent. By this application, the applicant is seeking relaxation of the condition imposed by this court vide order dated 30.1.2009 in Criminal Application No. 4486 of 2008. By this order, the applicant was directed not to leave the city of Pune without seeking permission of the court. Mr Gupte, learned senior counsel for the applicant, submits that such condition was imposed because his presence for interrogation was required at that stage and some other accused were to be arrested. He submits that his presence for interrogation is not required since the investigation, insofar as the present applicant is concerned, is almost over. The learned APP does not dispute this submission and submits that she has no objection for allowing the applicant to leave the city of Pune once in a week with prior intimation to the police. In the circumstances, I pass the following order. The applicant is allowed to leave the city of Pune once in a week with prior intimation to the police. Rest of the order dated 30.1.2009 remains unaltered. The application is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 2

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5645 OF 2009 Mahesh Vasant Borse ..Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & anr. ..Respondents None for the petitioner Mr.S.N.Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 & 2 CORAM : S.B.MHASE & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 2ND SEPTEMBER,2009 P.C. . The matter pertains to the recruitment of the Police Constable. The petitioner has undergone the Selection Process and was not selected. Thereafter, he has filed this Writ Petition. The grievance of the petitioner is that he belongs to Other Backward Class Category and also possesses Non Creamylayer Certificate. His case should have been considered by the respondents in Other Backward Class Category. The respondents have filed an Affidavit in this respect and it is stated that at the time of the scrutiny of the document, the petitioner had not possessed Non Creamylayer Certificate and therefore, the petitioner had agreed to the inclusion of his name in the Open Category. Accordingly, he has given a statement to that effect. Therefore, he was considered in the Open Category. We, therefore, do not find any merit in the above Writ Petition. The above Writ Petition is accordingly rejected. ( R.M.SAVANT, J.) ( S.B.MHASE, J. )

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.8907 OF 2007 : Office Notes, Office Memoranda of coram, appearances, Court's orders : or directions and Registrar's orders. : Court's or Judge's orders. : : : None for the petitioner. None for the respondent. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. : . Since morning this matter has been called out twice and on both occasions none appears for the petitioners. In the circumstances, I am constrained to dismiss this petition for non prosecution. Order accordingly. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4622 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. ........ OF 2005 State of Maharashtra .... Applicant Vs. Bharat Narayan Patil & Ors. .... Respondents Ms A.S. Pai, APP, for the Applicant. Shri Sudatta Patil for the Respondents. CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & Smt. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: JULY 04, 2007 P.C: Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Taking into consideration the medical evidence as well as the testimony of the eye-witnesses to the incident, prima facie it appears that the accused exceeded in the exercise of their private defence and, therefore, the matter requires consideration. Hence, leave is granted in terms of Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C. in filing the appeal against the impugned judgment dated 24-2-2005 passed in Sessions Case No.151 of 2001 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli. Accordingly, the appeal stands admitted. Action under Section 390 of the Cr.P.C. to follow. (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/J7cag4622.5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.222 OF 2005 Babasaheb Ramrao Patil .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Shri Jay Shekhar for the Petitioner. Ms A.S. Pai, APP, for the State. Shri Sudatta Patil for the Respondents Nos.2 to 5. CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & Smt. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: JULY 04, 2007 P.C: In view of the Appeal filed by the prosecution against the impugned judgment having been admitted, question of entertaining the present revision application does not arise. The revision application, therefore, is dismissed. (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/J7cag4622.5

Order - Status 9: -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1627 OF 2005 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.1140 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Ms Deepali Kali h/f Mr.P.N.Joshi for the Applicant Mr.Arun Palekar for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 4,2008. P.C.: Heard Advocates for the parties. Second Appeal has been admitted for final hearing. The decree for possession passed by the trial court and confirmed by the Appellate Court was stayed during the pendency of the Appeal before the Appellate Court. In this view of the matter, ad-interim order granted on 13th October 2005 deserves to be continued as interim order till the final disposal of the Appeal. Hence, Civil Application is disposed of by directing that ad-interim order dated 13th October 2005 will continue to operate as interim order till the final disposal of the Appeal. JUDGE

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1834 OF 2009 Shri Aiyaz Mamoodmiya Rais : Petitioner (Orig.Accused) V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. : Respondents ... Mr.S.D. Patil with Mr.Shivraj R. Patil for the petitioner. Mr.D.P.Adsule, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. ... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : JULY 20, 2009. P.C.: Mentioned. Not on board. Issue notice before admission, returnable in two weeks. By way of ad-interim relief, the interim bail granted by the trial Court on 15.6.2009 shall be extended till then. S.A. BOBDE, J.

Order - Status 2: KJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (ST) NO.16055 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4870 OF 2011 Chare Education Society & Anr. )....Petitioners V/s. Abasaheb Suryavanshi & Ors. )....Respondents Mr.S.G.Kudle for the petitioners. CORAM : S.A.BOBDE & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. D ATE : 29th JUNE, 2012. P.C. :- 1 Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 13.7.2012. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J) (S.A.BOBDE,J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION 249/2012 IN W.P.4870/2011 Chare Education Society & Anr. Petitioners Vs. Abasaheb Suryavanshi & Ors. Respondents Mr.S.G.Kudale for petitioners Mr.Vijay Killedar for Res.3 Mr.A.I.Patel,AGP for Res.4 CORAM- S.A.BOBDE AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE- 1st AUGUST,2012. P.C. According to Mr.Kudale respondent nos.1 and 2 have been served on 13/7/2012, however, none appears. In the circumstances the respondents are directed to remain personally present in the Court on 16/8/2012. Copy of this order shall be served upon the respondents by the petitioner by Humdust. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar,J.) (S.A.Bobde,J.) srs

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.249 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4870 OF 2011 Chare Education Society and another … Petitioners Vs. Abasaheb Suryavanshi & others … Respondents Mr. S. G. Kudle for Petitioners. Mr. Rupesh K. Bobade for Contempnor Nos.1 and 2. Ms S. S. Bhende, AGP for Respondent No.4. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE & R. G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 27TH SEPTEMBER, 2012 P.C.: It is surprising that respondent Nos.1 and 2 - contempnors are not present in the Court inspite of service of the notice from this Court. They are directed to remain present on 3rd October 2012. Stand over to 3rd October 2012. (R. G. KETKAR, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.249 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4870 OF 2011 Chare Education Society and another … Petitioners Vs. Abasaheb Suryavanshi and others … Respondents Mr. S. G. Kudle for Petitioners. Mr. Rupesh Bobade for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Vijay Killedar for Respondent No.3. Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP for Respondent No.4. CORAM : V. M. KANADE & R. G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 3RD OCTOBER, 2012 P.C.: Despite two orders being passed by this Court directing respondent Nos.1 and 2 to remain present, today respondent No.1 has remained absent. Mr. Bobade, learned Counsel for respondent No.1 seeks one last chance. As and by way of last chance, stand over to 10th October 012. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 to remain present on the next date of hearing, failing which, appropriate steps will be taken. (R. G. KETKAR, J.) (V. M. KANADE, J.)

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.249 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4870 OF 2011 Chare Education Society & Anr. …Petitioners V/s. Abasaheb Suryavanshi & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.S.G. Kudle for the Petitioners. Mr.A.I. Patel, A.G.P. for the State - Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.Vijay Killedar for Respondent No.3. Mr.Rupesh K. Bobde for Respondent No.4. Mr.Amit Shete for Respondent No.5. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2013. P.C. :- In view of the order passed in Writ Petition No.4870 of 2011, there is no case for contempt. There is nothing to indicate that the school was not shifted to the location indicated in the order dated 22.02.2012. The contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 136 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's Memoranda of Coram, orders appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders ------------------------------------------------------ Mr. D.R. Tiwari for appellant-wife. Mr. S.C. Thatte for respondent-husband. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, & D.B. BHOSALE,JJ. 18/07/2008. P.C.: . Heard Mr. Tiwari the learned counsel for the appellant-wife. . Admit. . Mr. Thatte waives service for the respondent-husband. . Appeal to be heard with FCA No. 66 of 2008. (D.B. Bhosale,J.) (B.H.Marlapalle,J.)