All Cases

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 23th APRIL 2015 P.C. : On account of paucity of time rest of the matters on Daily Board are adjourned to dates fixed as per the CMIS (Court Management Information System) which read as under: SR.NO NUMBER ADJOURNED DATE 2 ALP/46/2013 28/04/2015 4 APPA/838/2014 28/04/2015 5 APPA/131/2015 28/04/2015 6 APPA/483/2015 28/04/2015 8 APPLN/688/2014 28/04/2015 10 APEAL/408/2015 09/06/2015 11 APPLN/451/2013 05/05/2015 12 APPLN/529/2013 05/05/2015 13 APPLN/532/2013 05/05/2015 14 APEAL/794/1997 15/06/2015 15 APEAL/913/2004 15/06/2015 2 Interim orders, if any in force in any of the petitions/applications, till today, shall continue to remain in force till the next date fixed for such matter/matters. 3 In case of extreme urgency either of the parties may move the Court for production of papers before it. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 28th APRIL 2015 P.C. : On account of paucity of time rest of the matters on Daily Board are adjourned to dates fixed as per the CMIS (Court Management Information System) which read as under: SR.NO NUMBER ADJOURNED DATE 29 ALP/124/2015 09/06/2015 30 ALP/156/2015 09/06/2015 31 APEAL/311/2015 09/06/2015 33 APEAL/498/2015 16/06/2015 34 ALP/322/2013 16/06/2015 35 ALP/471/2013 16/06/2015 36 ALP/46/2013 16/06/2015 37 ALP/584/2013 16/06/2015 38 ALP/119/2014 16/06/2015 39 APPLN/695/2014 16/06/2015 40 APPLN/58/2015 16/06/2015 41 APPP/338/2015 08/05/2015 42 APPA/485/2015 08/05/2015 43 APEAL/612/2013 07/05/2015 44 APPA/838/2014 07/05/2015 45 APPA/1131/2014 12/06/2015 46 APPA/319/2015 12/06/2015 47 APEAL/330/2015 12/06/2015 48 APEAL/395/1995 16/06/2015 49 APEAL/1302/2004 16/06/2015 50 APEAL/19/2005 16/06/2015 2 Interim orders, if any in force in any of the petitions/applications, till today, shall continue to remain in force till the next date fixed for such matter/matters. 3 In case of extreme urgency either of the parties may move the Court for production of papers before it. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.838 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.84 OF 2013 Gulab Rambhai Rohit ... Applicant V/s. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. ... Respondents ..... Mrs.Mallika Ingale, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.Krinjal Ahuja i/b. Mr.Rajesh Desia, Advocate for the Respondent/CBI. Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent/State. .... CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY J. DATED : 7TH MAY 2015 P.C. The learned counsel for the respondent/CBI prays for time to file a counter affidavit. Stand over to 19th June 2015 . To be listed along with appeal. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY J.)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.838 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.84 OF 2013 Gulab Ramubhai Rohit ... Applicant V/s. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.V.Marwadi i/b. Ms.Malika A. Ingale, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.Rebecca Gonsalvez, Advocate for the Respondent No.1/CBI. Mrs.S.GajareDhumal, APP for the Respondent/State. .... ..... CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY J. DATED : 8TH OCTOBER 2015 P.C. The learned counsel for the respondent No.1/CBI prays for time. Granted finally. Stand over to 28th October 2015 . (ABHAY M. THIPSAY J.) CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.

Order - Status 16: 4-APPA-838-2014-APPEAL-84-2013.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.838 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.84 OF 2013 GULAB RAMBHAI ROHIT )...APPLICANT V/s. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.)...RESPONDENTS Shri S.V.Marwadi i/b. Smt.Mallika Ingale, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt.Rebecca Gonsalvez, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Smt.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATE : 28th OCTOBER 2015. P.C. : 1 Shri S.V.Marwadi, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that he would urge that the appeal itself be listed for final hearing at an early date, and that, he would not press the present application. 2 After hearing Shri Marwadi and Smt.Rebecca Gonsalvez, the learned counsel for respondent no.1, it is directed that the appeal be listed for 'Final Hearing' on 8th December 2015. 3 In view of this, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.) CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment / Order.

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 1784 OF 2017 In WRIT PETITION 6942 OF 2016 Rajani Arvind Parchure ....Applicant V/S Shri. Narhari Mahadev Gole @ Badekar ....Respondent CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI, J DATE : 22nd December, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned as per CMIS date. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6942 OF 2016 Rajani Arvind Parchure ] Applicant Vs. Shri Narhari Mahadev Gole @ Bedekar ] Respondent ….. Mr. Sandesh Shukla a/w Mr. Amit Singh i/b Santosh Sawant, for Applicant. ….. CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 22ND MARCH, 2018. P.C. Heard Mr. Shukla, learned Counsel for the applicant. This is an application for bringing heirs and legal representatives of the petitioner on record. Office remark shows that the Civil Application is filed in time. For the reasons stated in the application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs. Leave to convert Writ Petition into Civil Revision Application is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. At the request of Mr. Shukla, Writ Petition is taken up for admission. By this application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the petitioner hereinafter referred to 'plaintiff' has challenged the judgment and decree dated 28th October, 2013 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Sangli in Regular Civil Appeal No.197 of 2009. By that order, the learned District Judge allowed the appeal preferred by the appellant/defendant and dismissed the suit. The learned District Judge held that the defendant is in possession of the suit premises on the basis of oral agreement of sale of the year 2002. He submitted that Section 17 (1A) of the Registration Act, 1908 lays down that the documents containing contracts to transfer for consideration, any immovable property for the purpose of Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, shall be registered, if they have been executed on or after 24th September, 2001 and if such documents are not registered on or after such commencement then, they shall have no effect for the purpose of Section 53A of the Act. He submitted that the learned District Judge, therefore, was not justified in holding that the defendant is in possession of the suit premises on the basis of oral agreement of sale of 2002. In view of this submission, issue notice to the respondent returnable on 19th April, 2018. Parties are put to the notice that subject to the time constraint and convenience of the Court, Petition will be disposed of finally at the stage of admission. Notice shall further indicate that despite service if the respondents fail to appear, the Court will proceed to decide the petition on its own merits. In the meantime, call for record and proceedings. [R.G. KETKAR, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 244 OF 2008 Dr. Gyanendra S.N. Singh .. Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.K.S. Patil for the applicant. Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 30TH JANUARY 2008 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with the offence registered with Jogeshwari Police Station, Mumbai under C.R. No.196/2007 punishable under section 498-A, 323, 506, 504, 379, 377 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier application made by the applicant to the Sessions Court (Application No.24/2008) for bail has been rejected by an order dated 18th January 2008. The complainant is the wife of Arvind Pawar. The applicant is a friend of Arvind Pawar. In the FIR lodged by the complainant on 5th November 2007, she alleged that the complainant and her husband lived together for 5-6 months after the marriage. Thereafter there were quarrels between them. Hence she left the house. Thereafter her husband has been harassing her and on 1st October 2007 Arvind along with his three friends including the present applicant came to her house, assaulted her and took away gold mangalsutra weighing about 1 tola and 2 gold bangles weighing about 2 1/2 tolas. The complainant further alleges that in the past her husband had unnatural intercourse with her though she had not informed this to anyone. There is no allegation that the applicant is in any way concerned with the act of unnatural intercourse allegedly committed by the husband. In my view, the learned Sessions Judge has erred in assuming that the present applicant is also a party to the unnatural offence punishable under section 379 of the I.P.C. The only allegation against the applicant is that he accompanied the husband of the complainant on 1st October 2007 when she was allegedly robbed of one gold mangalsutra and 2 gold bangles. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant. There is no independent witness to the incident. There is a delay of more than a month in lodging the FIR after the alleged robbing. In the circumstances, the applicant is entitled to bail. Hence, I pass the following order:- ORDER In the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with the offence mentioned above, he shall be released on bail on executing personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount subject to the condition that the applicant shall not make any contact with the complainant and shall not in any way make any inducement or threat to any of the prosecution witnesses and shall attend the concerned police station as and when summoned by the police for the purpose of interrogation/ investigation. This order shall come to an end after the charge sheet is filed whereupon the applicant, if he so desires, may apply for regular bail before the regular court. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 244 OF 2008 Shri Abdul Rahim Tantray. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. S.V.Kotwal i/b. S.S.Bhandary for the applicant. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 2nd May 2008. P.C.: ---- . Heard. Perused record. The relaxation sought to be prayed by the applicant was already granted under order dated 1st February, 2008. The applicant has availed the benefit of that order. There cannot be successive relaxation in every alternate month. Application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1105 OF 2015 Ghanshyam Jagannath Vishwakarma ... Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Ms. Priyanka S.Karnik, Advocate appointed ,for the applicant. Ms. P.P.Shinde, APP, for the State CORAM: SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 18th June, 2015. P.C . An application is received through jail. The applicant is praying for bail in Case No.253 of 2012 registered at Kandivli Police Station. This Court had requested the learned counsel Ms. Priyanka S. Karnik, to espouse the cause of the applicant. He has graciously accepted to do the same. Office to furnish copy of the application to the Advocate so appointed. The learned APP to take specific instructions in respect of the stage of the trial. S.O. 30.6.2015 (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1105 OF 2015 Ghanshyam Jagannath Vishwakarma .....Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent None for Applicant Ms. P. P. Shinde APP for the State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATED : 30th JUNE 2015 PC : Learned APP has placed on record the report showing that applicant herein has been enlarged on bail on 12/06/2015. It is also fairly submitted that applicant has attended Sessions Court on 18/06/2015. Report is taken on record and marked as article 'X' for the purpose of identification. In view of this, prayers in the application have become infructuous. Application stands disposed of in above terms. Office to communicate this order to the Sessions Court. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 4: SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2023.06.02 16:44:17 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Mr.Mayank Joshi – Advocate for Applicants. Mr.Y.Y.Dabke – APP for the Respondent – State. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : st 31 MAY, 2023 P. C. :- Mentioned out of turn. Learned Advocate for the Applicants seeks liberty to carry out an amendment in the Application. Liberty granted. It be carried out within a week. Copy be served on other side. Matter be kept on 13th June, 2023. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant And Anr. APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIRAM MADHUSUDAN MODAK J DATE : 17th July, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 17/08/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant And Anr. APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIRAM MADHUSUDAN MODAK J DATE : 24th July, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 28/07/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Mr. Mayank Joshi - Advocate for the Applicant Mr. H. J. Dedhia - APP for the Respondent/State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 28th JULY, 2023 P. C. :- The Respondent No. 2 is department of the CGST. Recently, they have not been served about circulation. Matter be kept on 31st July, 2023, high on board. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 13: +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Mr.Mayank Joshi a/w Mr.Sumedh Sonawane and Mr.Parshva Bhankharia – Advocates for Applicants. Mr.H.J.Dedhia – APP for Respondent No.1 – State. Mr.Santosh Khedkar – Assistant Commissioner SGST–Mazgaon, Mumbai–INV–044. Mr.Rajendra Pisal – State Tax Officer–Thane–THA–SUR–C–002. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATED : 31ST JULY 2023 P. C. : Heard learned Advocate for the Applicants. There is a preliminary objection taken by learned APP about placing this Application before the concerned Court. According to him, Thane Office of Sales Tax Department is not going to lodge prosecution but Competent Authority is the Mazgaon Office – Mumbai. With their assistance, my attention is invited to the following three documents :- (a) A show cause notice issued for cancellation of registration on Page No.22 dated 7th September, 2022. (b) Summons issued by Assistant Commissioner of State Tax – Mazgaon, Mumbai dated 31st March, 2023 on Page No.25 wherein, the Applicant was directed to remain present for recording statement under Section 70 of MGST Act. (c) A show cause notice for cancellation of registration dated 26th April, 2023 issued by Thane Office (Page No.31). Learned APP after taking instructions submitted that Thane Office is not going to initiate any prosecution against the Applicant. The statement is accepted. In view of that, the subject does not fall within the assignment of this Court. So, only apprehension remains is on the basis of summons issued by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax – Mazgaon. In respect of that apprehension, let Office to place it before Appropriate Bench. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Anr. … Applicants versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents None for Applicants. Mr. R.M.Pethe, APP for State. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 8 SEPTEMBER 2023 P.C. None appears for the Applicants when called out. Stand over to 12 October 2023. ( N.J.JAMADAR, J. ) SSP 1/1

Order - Status 18: 4-ABA-1486-23.DOC Sayali Upasani IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Others ...Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents None for Applicants. Mr. M. G. Patil, APP for State. CORAM:- N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED:- 12th OCTOBER, 2023 PC:- None present for the applicants. None had appeared for the applicants on 8th September, 2023 as well. The application stands dismissed for want of prosecution. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] Signed by: Sayali D Upasani Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 13/10/2023 11:46:26 1/1

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRTIT PETITION NO.237 OF 2005 Shri...Petitioner. Jayant Vithal Abhyankar V/s Mr. Lulu Domnic Fernandes and...Respondents. Ors. --- Mr. Sunil R. More for the petitioner. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. --- CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 1st March, 2005 P.C. Issue notice before admission. Returnable within four weeks. In the meantime, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c). Hamdust permitted. V.M. KANADE, J.

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 237 OF 2005. Jayant V. Abhyankar ....Petitioner Versus Lulu D. Fernandes and Ors. ...Respondents Mr. S.S. Mangaonkar for the petitioner. Ms. Nipa Singh, instructed by M/s. Mahesh Menon & Co., for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2005 . P.C. Due to paucity of time, it is not possible to take up this matter today. Stand over to 13 th February, 2006. Ad-interim order granted , if any, to continue till the next date of hearing. (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 237 OF 2005 Jayant Vithal Abhyankar ….Petitioner. Vs. Lulu Domnic Fernandes & Ors. ….Respondents. None for the Petitioner. Mr. A.R. Patil APP, for the RespondentState. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER, 2018. P.C.: None for the Petitioner. 2 Dismissed for nonprosecution. (A.S. GADKARI, J.) S S Mashalkar Digitally signed by S S Mashalkar Date: 2018.09.18 17:01:12 +0530

Order - Status 5: 35APL6222016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 622 OF 2016 Kapil Vilas Gandhi …Applicant Versus Ritesh Khandewal & Anr. …Respondents Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam, for the Applicant. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for Respondent No.2State. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 20th June 2016 P.C. : Heard learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and learned APP for 2nd Respondent. Issue notice to the 1st Respondent returnable on 4th August 2016. In addition to service through Court, the Advocate for the Applicant is directed to serve private notice along with an authenticated copy of this order. If proper Affidavit of Service is not filed on or before 27th July 2016, the Application shall stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the Court. By way of adinterim relief, we direct that though 35APL6222016.doc investigation shall continue in the subject F.I.R., ChargeSheet shall not be filed as against the Applicant. [A.A. SAYED, J.] [A.S. OKA, J.]

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 662 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None for the Applicant. Shri. A.S.Patil, APP. for the State. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 02nd August, 2016 P.C. None for the applicant. Even on earlier occasion none appeared for the applicant. Dismissed for non prosecution. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 8: Vidya amin IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION AND CIVIL/CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : A.S. OKA & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : 4TH AUGUST, 2016. P.C. On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Supplementary Board are adjourned to dates fixed as per the CMIS (Court Management Information System) which read as under: Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date 44, 45, 46, 51, 52, 53 (Cri.) 28/11/2016 47(Cri) 15/06/2017 48 (O.S.), 60 (Cri.) 16/08/2016 49, 50 (Cri.) 27/09/2016 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 (Cri) 29/11/2016 61 (Cri.) 21/10/2016 62, 63 (O.S.) 21/09/2016 64, 66 (Cri.) 27/09/2016 65 (Civil) 25/08/2016 67 (Cri.) 18/08/2016 If in any of the above matters, adinterim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates fixed in the matters. If adinterim or interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before this Court. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 622 OF 2016 Kapil Vilas Gandhi ....Applicant V/S Ritesh Khandewal And Anr ....Respondent Kuldeep U. Nikam For Applicant Mr. A. K. Saxena a/w Ravi Subash Rattesar Respondent No.1 Dr. F. R. Shaikh APP for state CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ DATE : 27th September, 2016 P.C. : Place the petition on 28/09/2016 at 12.30 p.m. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 622 OF 2016 Kapil Vilas Gandhi …Applicant Versus Ritesh Khandewal & Anr. …Respondents Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam, for the Applicant. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for Respondent No.2-State. Mr.A.K.Saxena i/b Mr.Ravi S.Rattesar for the Respondent No.1. ... CORAM : A.S.OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 28 SEPTEMBER 2016 P.C.: Learned APP has tendered across the bar, the report dated 22 September 2016 submitted by the Sub-Inspector of Police of Lonawala City Police Station. In the report, it is stated that the charge sheet is being filed by the police against the accused Vicky Rajpal. Further, it is stated therein that there was no material found against the Applicant showing his involvement in the crime and therefore, charge sheet will not be filed as against the present Applicant. The statement is accepted. The report is taken on record and marked "R-1" for identification. The report shall be kept in a sealed envelope and copies of the report shall not be furnished to any party without express order of this Court. In view of the aforesaid statement made in the report, the present Application for quashing the First Information Report need not be entertained. Learned Counsel for the first Respondent submits that there is a material against the Applicant. However, it is for the first informant to take appropriate steps in that behalf. Suffice it to say that in view of what is stated in the report, at this stage, the present Application for quashing the First Information Report need not be entertained and the same is accordingly disposed of. In any event, under the orders of the Court if the police are permitted to carry out any further investigation as against the Applicant, it will be open for the Applicant to file a fresh Application seeking a relief which is sought in this Application. Subject to what is observed above, the Application is disposed of. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1541/2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.1236/2015 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - Mr. N. M. Bhole for the Applicant CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2015 P.C.: Heard. This Application is made by the Plaintiff for condonation of 8 days delay in filing the appeal challenging the decree dated 08/09/2014 passed by the Appellate Court in civil appeal NO.164/2008. Rule. Rule made returnable after 12 weeks. In addition to usual mode of service, Applicant is permitted to serve Respondents by private notice either by registered post A.D. and/or by hand delivery and file Affidavit of Service to that effect. JUDGE

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL.II) DATE : 18th November, 2015 One week time granted to supply copies for issuing notice to Respondent. REGISTRAR (JUDL.II)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL.II) DATE : 30th November, 2015 S.O. one week time granted to supply copies for issuing notice to Respondents, as a last chance. REGISTRAR (JUDL.II)

Order - Status 8: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL.II) DATE : 14th December, 2015 S.O. two weeks time granted to supply copies failing which this Civil Application stand disposed of without reference to the Court. REGISTRAR (JUDL.II)

Order - Status 10: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL.II) DATE : 7th January 2016 Issue notice to Respondent, returnable date is extended by eight (8) weeks. REGISTRAR (JUDL.II)

Order - Status 12: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders Adv. for Appellant present CORAM : A.N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDLII) Date : 3/03/2016 S.O. three (3) weeks time granted to take steps against unserved R.No.1. REGISTRAR (JUDLII)

Order - Status 14: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders None present CORAM : A.N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDLII) Date : 28/03/2016 S.O. three (3) weeks i.e. 18/04/2016 time granted to take steps against deceased Respondent No.1. sd/ REGISTRAR (JUDLII)

Order - Status 16: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders CORAM : A.N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDLII) Date : 18/04/2016 None present Three weeks (excluding Summer Vacation) time granted to take steps as a last chance. sd/ REGISTRAR (JUDLII)

Order - Status 18: THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Civil Application No. 1541 of 2015 In Second Appeal Stamp No. 1236 of 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders CORAM : A.N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDL.II) Date : 07/06/2016. Advocate for the Applicant is present. S.O. for three (3) weeks time granted to take steps regarding deceased R. No. 1. sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

Order - Status 20: Sequeira IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 in SECOND APPEAL (St.) NO. 1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's order or Directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr.Nilesh Bhole, for the Applicant. Mr.Harshad Shingnapurkar i/b Mr.Rohit Joshi, for Respondent No.2. CORAM: Jamdar N M J , Friday July 2016 1 , C P .: The Civil Application is abated as against Respondent No.1. The learned counsel for the Applicant seeks time. Stand over to eight weeks, i.e. 26 August 2016. (N Jamdar ) M J ,

Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO.1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil ....Applicant vs. Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. ....Respondents .... Mr. N.M. Bhole, for the Applicant. Mr. Rohit Joshi, for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J. DATED : 20 JANUARY 2017 P.C. : . Learned Counsel for the Applicant informs the Court that Respondent No.1 is dead and that he will take appropriate steps to bring legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.1 on record. Stand over to 17 February 2017. ( S.C. GUPTE, J. )

Order - Status 27: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.1236 OF 2015 ….. Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil … Applicant Versus Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil & Anr. … Respondents ….. Mr. Nilesh Bhole for the Applicant. Mr. Akshay Kandarkar i/b Rohit Joshi for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J. DATE : 17 FEBRUARY 2017 P.C. : Learned Counsel for the Applicant/Appellant states that the Respondent has died and his application for bringing legal heirs of the deceased Respondent on record is ready but not yet moved. He seeks time for the purpose. This Civil Application accordingly stood over to 24 March 2017. (S.C.GUPTE, J.)

Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 1541 OF 2015 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil ....Applicant V/S Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. ....Respondent None For Applicant Ms. Aditi Athawale i/b. Rohit D Joshi For Respondent No. 2. CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J DATE : 24th March, 2017 P.C. : None for the applicant, stand over to 21/04/2017 as a last chance. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 31: Rane (sr.58) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application in SA NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN Second Appeal (ST) NO. 1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil ...Applicant Versus Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. ...Respondents None for the Applicant, Appellant. Mr. Rohit Joshi, Advocate for Respondent no.2. CORAM: N.M. JAMDAR, J DATED: 21st April, 2017 PC:- . None for the Applicant. By order dated 1 July, 2016 it is recorded that Civil Application is abated as against Respondent no.1. Time was taken to take steps. No steps have been yet taken. The Application stands dismissed as against Respondent no.1. Stand over to next CMIS date i.e. 30 June, 2017. The Applicant will explain whether the Civil Application survives in view of dismissal of the Application as against Respondent no.1. (N.M. JAMDAR,J.)

Order - Status 33: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 1541 OF 2015 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil Applicant V/S Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. Respondent Nilesh Bhole For Applicant/Appellent Rohit Joshi Respondent No. 2 CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J DATE : 1st July, 2017 P.C. : In view of the joint request made by the learned Counsel for the parties, stand over to 07/07/2017 under the caption for High on Board. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 35: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 1236 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 12068 OF 2017 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil … Applicant Versus Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil and another … Respondents Mr. Nilesh Bhole for the Applicant in both C.A./Appellant. Mr. Rohit Joshi for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 7TH JULY, 2017 P.C.: Stand over to 10.07.2017, high on Board. ( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )

Order - Status 37: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 1541 OF 2015 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil ....Applicant V/S Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. ....Respondent Nilesh Bhole For Applicant Rohit Joshi for Respondent No. 2 CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J DATE : 10th July, 2017 P.C. : At the request of the learned Counsel for the Appellent, stand over to 18/07/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 39: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 1541 OF 2015 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil ....Applicant V/S Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA STAMP NO. 12068 OF 2017 In SECOND APPEAL LODGING NO . 1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil ....Applicant V/S Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. ....Respondent Nilesh Bhole For Applicant/Appellent Rohit Joshi for Respondent No. 2 CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J DATE : 18th July, 2017 P.C. : At the request of the learned Counsel for the Application, stand over to 19/07/2017 under the caption for First on Board. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 43: kpd 1 / 1 912CAS15412015.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 1236 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 12068 OF 2017 Mrs.Rohini Sudhakar Patil … Applicant Versus Shri.Ramchandra Kashinath Patil and another … Respondents Mr.Nilesh Bhole for the Applicant and Appellant. Mr.Rohit Joshi for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 19th JULY, 2017 P.C.: The Learned Advocate appearing for the Applicant on instructions seeks to withdraw the above Second Appeal. The above Second Appeal alongwith both the above Civil Applications are disposed off as withdrawn. ( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )