All Cases

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.190 OF 2018 ..... .... The State of Maharashtra ... Applicant V/s. Shri.Mithun Balaso Sawant & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Applicant/State. CORAM : A.M.BADAR J. DATED : 20th JULY 2018. P.C. : 1 Issue notice to respondents returnable on 14th September 2018. (A.M.BADAR J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.190 OF 2018 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...APPLICANT V/s. MITHUN BALASO SAWANT AND ANR. )...RESPONDENTS Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Applicant – State. Mr.Sharad Mulik, Advocate for the Respondent State. CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 15th OCTOBER 2018 P.C. : 1 This is an application for condonation of delay in preferring an application for leave to appeal. What is sought to be challenged is acquittal of the respondents in Special Case registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. 2 Heard the learned APP appearing for the State as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. He argued that carelessness of the State is reflected from the fact that neither the name of the court nor the other particulars are properly mentioned in the instant application. The same is therefore liable to be rejected. 3 I have considered the submissions so advanced. The delay occurred is that of 21 days. Leaving apart the misdescription of the court and other particulars in the application, sufficient cause is shown for the short delay of 21 days in filing the application for leave to appeal. Hence, the order : ORDER i) The application is allowed. ii) The delay in filing the application for leave to appeal is condoned. iii) The application is accordingly disposed off. (A. M. BADAR, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2444 OF 2007 Maya Niranjandas alias Waghmare .. Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra (Through the Vithalwadi P.Stn., Ulhasnagar) .. Respondent Mr.Rupesh K. Bobade for the applicant. Mr. Rajesh More, APP for the State. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. DATED : 14TH AUGUST, 2007 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No. I98/2006 registered at Vithalwadi Police Station, Ulhasnagar. The said case is registered under section 171, 364A, 384, 385, 504, 506 IPC It is the prosecution case that one Niranjan Das and the complainant were proceeding to Antop Hill on motorcycle. The complainant was driving the motorcycle. At that time the motorcycle skidded, due to this Niranjan sustained injuries. The wife of Niranjan and the friends of Niranjan including the applicant said that the complainant is responsible for the injuries and made him to pay Rs.21,000/ for medical expenses. It is further the case of the complainant that on 1.9.2006 the applicant alongwith others came to the house at the complainant stating that Niranjan and his wife had called him and they took him to the house of Niranjan. At that time, Niranjan and his wife Maya were present. It is further case of the complainant that in the house of Niranjan, he was assaulted by fist blows and Rs.2 lacs was demanded from him. The complainant told them that he was unable to pay the said amount whereupon they took document from him stating that the complainant would give an amount of Rs.50,000/ towards expenses to Niranjan Das. The said document has already been seized by the police. So far as the present applicant is concerned, her presence is shown together with certain circumstances given by her. Considering the role of the present applicant and the fact that the investigation is complete and chargesheet has been filed, all necessary documents have already been seized and that she is a woman who is also required to look after her children, I am inclined to grant her bail subject to the following conditions: (a) The applicant arrested in connection with C.R.No.I-98/2006, registered with Vithalwadi Police Station, Ulhasnagar, shall be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/ with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. (b) The applicant shall report to Vithalwadi Police Station, Ulhasnagar once in a week i.e. on every Saturday between 03.00 p.m. to 05.00 p.m. till conclusion of the trial. (c) The order of bail will be given effect only after the applicant furnishes to the investigating officer the details about his place of residence and address where he proposes to stay after he is enlarged on bail. The applicant will not change his residential address thereafter till the conclusion of trial without prior intimation to the investigating officer. (d) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement or threat or pressurise any prosecution witnesses and shall not in any manner tamper with the prosecution evidence. (e) The applicant shall cooperate with the inves agency for disposal of the case. It is needless to mention that breach of any of the conditions by the applicant shall result in cancellation of bail. (f) Any observation made in this order shall not be construed as finding or expression on merits of the case at the time of trial. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (V.C. DAGA, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5203 OF 2011 Solapur Zilla Dekhrekh Sahakari Saunstha Maryaditt ..Petitioner V/s. Malkari Banappa Whanmane & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Surel Shah for the Petitioner CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 20TH AUGUST, 2011. P.C. :- 1 Heard Shri Surel Shah for the Petitioner. Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable in two weeks. Apart from the Court notice private service through Courier / Email / Registered post A.D. is permitted. Parties are put to notice that the Petition may be heard and disposed of finally at the admission stage. The Learned AGP waives service on behalf of Respondent No.2-District Deputy Registrar Cooperative Societies. (R.M.Savant, J.)

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL AND CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : JULY 3, 2013 P.C. On account of paucity of time rest of the matters on Daily Board are adjourned to dates fixed as per the CMIS (Court Management Information System) which read as under : Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date 14 30/07/2013 44,46 22/07/2013 49 TO 52 23/07/2013 54 TO 56 24/07/2013 57, 58 29/07/2013 59, 60 30/07/2013 61 31/07/2013 62 TO 66 07/08/2013 67 TO 76 12/08/2013 77 TO 96 13/08/2013 If in any of the above matters, ad interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If adinterim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. If there is any extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before this Court. ( K.K. TATED, J )

Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5203 OF 2011 Solapur Zilla Dekhrekh Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit ... Petitioner V/s. Malkari Banappa Whanmane & Ors. ... Respondents None for the Petitioner and Respondent. CORAM : K.K. TATED *, J. 7th August, 2013.* P.C. : Twice the matter is called out no one appeared on behalf of the Petitioner. Writ Petition is dismissed for default. (K.K. TATED, J.) katkam k

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVILAPPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 867 OF 2010 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2393 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 867 OF 2010 Rajendra Vitthal Bahirat. Appellant. Versus Prakash Ramchandra Girme. Respondent. Mr. A. B. Tajane for the Appellant. Mr. Mandar Limaye for the Respondent. CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR and A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 14TH JULY, 2010. P. C. : By consent, S. O. to 22nd July, 2010. Sd/ Sd/ (A. A. SAYED, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 867 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2393 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.867 OF 2010 Rajendra Vitthal Bahirat & ors. ....Appellants. Vs. Prakash Ramchandra Girme. ....Respondent. Mr.A.B.Tajane for appellants. Mr. Mandar Limaye for respondent. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED:- JULY 22, 2010 P.C. Not before the Bench of which one of us(A.M.Khanwilkar,J) is a member. (A.A.SAYED, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)

Order - Status 11: Shri Rajendra Vitthal Bahirat & Ors. ..Appellants Vs. Shri Prakash Ramchandra Girme ..Respondent Shri P.B.Jagtap i/b Shri Ashok Tajane for the Appellants Shri Mandar Limaye for the Respondent Coram: P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.M.SAVANT, JJ Date: 16th August 2010 P.C. mmj The Learned Counsel for the Appellants fairly states that this Appeal is not maintainable as the order is passed by the Trial Court under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. The Learned Counsel for the Appellants further states that he would like to file Revision Application. The permission is granted to take out appropriate proceedings as deem fit in accordance with law. The Certified copy and other papers annexed with the said First Appeal to be returned back to the Learned Counsel for the Appellants by giving simple copy of the same. Refund of Court fees as per rules. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (P.B.MAJMUDAR,J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6517 OF 2017 Bholanath R. Shukla ...Petitioner vs. The Transport Engineer (Projects) ...Respondent Mr. Ajinkya Patil a/w. Mr. Dharmapal Dave i/b. Naik Patil Salvi & Associates, for the Petitioner. Mr. B.B. Sharma, for RespondentCIDCO. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 19, 2017 P.C.: . The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition if occasion so arises. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (M. S. SONAK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

Order - Status 11: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1032 OF 2011 Noormohammed Hasan Bepari .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.J.B.Kocheta i/b. Mr.S.M.Bhalghat & Mr.P.D.Purway, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.F.E.Saldanha, Special Public Prosecutor, for NCB Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. On being indicated that the application would not be granted, the learned Counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw Bail Application. Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn. Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET APPELLATE SIDE Civil Application No.961 of 2007 In Civil Writ Petition No.8127 of 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.Yashodhan Sakhare i/b. M/s.YKS Legal for applicant. Mr.J.D.Fernandes fo resp.nos.1, 2A to 2D & 3 to 7. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. April 13 2007. P.C. .Heard. This is an application to bring on record the LRs of respondent dent no.1 who died on 13/1/2007 as per the letter red letter received by the applicant on the appli cant o on 17/1/2007. .Hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Petition memo be an amended accordingly within one week. Is Issue notice to the added respondents, s, returnable le i in the first week of June 2007, subject to remittance of 007, subj ject to rer nittance o of fresh Bhatta charges. a charge s. (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 130 OF 2020 Jabin Nawaj Shaikh Sajit Salim Hundekari ...Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ….. Mr. Satyavrat Joshi a/w Mr. Sunil Kamble, Advocate for the Applicants. Smt. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State-Respondent. Mr. P.A. Gaikwad, Police Hawaldar, Shrikapur Police Station, Present. ….. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 17th January, 2020 PC : The applicants had preferred an application for anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court in connection with C.R. No. 5 of 2020 registered with Shikrapur Police Station, Pune Rural for offences punishable under Sections 306, 504, 506 r/w Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. By order dated 9th January, 2020 the learned Special Judge had declined to grant interim protection to the applicants. However, the other accused were granted interim protection. The order further indicates that the accused-applicants were directed to remain present before the Court till the disposal of the main application. Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that, in the event the applicant remains present before the Sessions Court, there is apprehension of their arrest. It is further submitted that the applicant No.1 is pregnant lady. It is also submitted that the applicants are having similar role with other accused who were granted interim protection. The case before the Sessions Court for hearing the application is tomorrow. Considering the aforesaid circumstance, interim protection can be granted to the applicants pending their application before Sessions Court. O R D E R i) In the event of arrest of applicants in C.R. No. 5 of 2020 registered with Shikrapur Police Station, Pune Rural, the applicants be released on bail on furnishing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25000/-, with one or more sureties in the like amount; ii) This interim protection shall operate till the disposal of the application, pending before the Sessions Court. It is made clear that this court has not adjudicated merits of the case and the Sessions Court shall deal with the application in accordance with law. iii) Application stands disposed of accordingly. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)