All Cases

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2012 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders Mr.Sudhir Sakpal h/f.Mr.S.M.Suryawanshi for the Applicant. Ms.V.R.Bhosale, APP for the State/R2. CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 2nd March, 2012. P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned APP for Respondent No.2/State. Issue notice to Respondent No.1, returnable after four weeks. (R.G.KETKAR, J.)

Order - Status 14: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2012 M/s. Lalit Construction .Applicant V/s. Rakesh Roshan & anr. .Respondents None for the Applicant Mr.Y.M.Nakhawa, APP, for Respondent No.2 - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 12TH JUNE, 2012 P.C. . None for the applicant even on second call. Criminal Application is dismissed for want of prosecution. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1831 OF 2017 In FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 13947 OF 2017 The New India Assurance Co.ltd.through Applicant Centralized Motor Tp Claims Hub V/S Mr. Ashok Dayabji Ramparia And Anr. Respondent CORAM : G.S. PATEL, J DATE : 11th July, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned, Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 19/07/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1831 OF 2017 In FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 13947 OF 2017 The New India Assurance Co.ltd.through Applicant Centralized Motor Tp Claims Hub V/S Mr. Ashok Dayabji Ramparia And Anr. Respondent CORAM : G.S. PATEL, J DATE : 19th July, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned, Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 23/08/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: Shephali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 13947 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1831 OF 2017 The New India Assurance Co Ltd …Appellant Versus Ashik Dayabji Ramparia & Ors …Respondents Mr Devendranath S Joshi *, for the Appellant/Applicant.* Mrs Varsha Chavan *, for the Respondents Nos. 1 to 4.* CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 27th July 2017 PC:- 1. The facts are set out in the judgment delivered today in First Appeal No. 1 of 2015. Here the claimant was the rider of the motorcycle. His father, who was riding pillion, died in the same accident. 2. The same issue as regards the permit was taken in this case. I have rejected the submission. The present case is one of injury. The claimant was admitted to the Sanjivani Hospital on 2nd November 2006. He was operated for a fracture and he was an indoor patient till 17th November 2006. He submitted his medical bills. He had a grade II compound fracture of the humerus with rapid nerve palsy, abrasion and other injuries. He says he has difficulty in moving. He has had body implants. He is unable to carry on his effective work as a mason. His permanent partial disability was estimated at 48% based on the evidence of one Dr Naresh Khanna. The Tribunal awarded him Rs. 25,000/- towards future medical expenses and then proceeded to award an amount of Rs. 3,93,000/- as compensation including NFL. 3. In my view, there is really no reason to interfere with any part of the award. The MACT has correctly assessed every aspect of it including taking into account that the fracture was to the right hand and, therefore, taken a slightly higher amount towards the disability compensation. 4. I do not think it is possible to fault the conclusions of the Tribunal. The principles that have been established by the Supreme Court in Arvind Kumar Mishra vs New India Assurance Co Ltd ** 1 ** regarding the duty of the Court to provide reasonable restitution to the claimant have been followed in letter and in spirit. 5. The statutory deposit of Rs. 25,000/- is to be transferred to the MACT, Mumbai within two weeks from today. 6. The claimant is entitled to withdraw the entire amount with all accrued interest. The MACT will permit such withdrawal on production of an authenticated copy of this order. 1 (2010) 10 SCC 254. 7. The appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. 8. The civil application does not survive and is disposed of as infructuous. (G. S. PATEL, J)

Order - Status 11: 28.wp.1806-09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1806 OF 2009 Jitendra Narayanbhai Pokar. ..Petitioner. Versus Mr.Prakash Mavani and others. ..Respondents. Mr.Diwakar Dwivedi, Advocate i/b. Mr.Pravin Singhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr.F.R. Shaikh, A.P.P., for the Respondent - State. ... ... CORAM : 1: BILAL NAZKI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2009. P.C. :- Learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. Hence, Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. [BILAL NAZKI,J.] [A.R.JOSHI,J.]

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2053 of 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8145 OF 2011 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Petitioner Ansari i/b. Ms.Saima Ansari i/b. R.N.Gite for the the Mr.Sachin Padye i/b. Girish Agarwal for the Respondents. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 29th AUGUST, 2013 P.C. : Rule. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2053 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8145 OF 2011 Smt. Rangubai Anandrao Murkute & Ors..... Applicants Vs. Shri. Bhika Ganpat Murkute (deceased) .... Respondents thru' heirs and LRs. Shri. Ashok Bhika Murkute & Ors. Ms. Saima Ansari h/for Mr. R.N. Gite, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. G.R. Agarwal, Advocate for respondents no.1 A to 1F. Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 4th July, 2014. P.C. This civil application is for restoration of the writ petition, which was dismissed pursuant to the order dtd. 3rd April, 2013. By that order, an application for adjournment by the applicant was granted on condition that the applicants pay costs quantified Rs.1,500/ by depositing the same in the office of Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority, High Court, Mumbai on/or before the next date, which was after one week. The costs being condition precedent, it was directed that if the costs are not paid within the stipulated time, the petition shall stand dismissed without any further reference to the court. Admittedly, the costs are not paid till date. In that circumstance, there can be no question of restoration of the writ petition. The civil application is therefore dismissed. (Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.)