All Cases

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION W.P. NO. 6159 OF 2009 Deccan Education Society, Pune and Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. Shri.Ashutosh Nandkishore Ranade and Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr. V.D.Borwankar Adv. for Petitioners Mr. A.I.Khemani AGP for Respondent No.2 CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 25, 2009 .... P.C.: Notice to respondent no.1 returnable on 9th September, 2009. In addition to that, the learned advocate for the petitioner to serve respondent no.1 by private service and file affidavit of service. Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent no.2. [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION W.P. NO.6159 OF 2009 Deccan Education Society Fergusson CollegeMr. and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Shri.Ashutosh Nandkishore Ranade and Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr.V.D.Borwankar Adv. for Petitioners Mr.A.I.Khemani AGP for Respondent No.2. Mr.S.M.Joshi Adv. for Respondent No.3. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 09, 2009 P.C.: The learned advocate for the Petitioner states that he will file affidavit of service by 17.9.2009. Time to complete the inquiry, is extended upto 30.9.2009. S.O. 23.9.2009. [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6159 OF 2009 .... Deccan Education Society & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. Ashutosh Nandkishore Ranade & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.V.D.Borwankar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.A.M.Joshi, Advocate, for respondent no.1. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. DATE : 13th NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. The employee has filed a cross petition bearing Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 20904 of 2009, which is not on board today. By consent, these two writ petitions to be kept together for admission. Stand over to 19th November 2009. (R.S.MOHITE, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sangpal Gulabrao Jamnik ] Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ] Respondent Ms. Mayuri Hatle, for the Applicant. Smt.Rutuja Abmekar, APP for the State. CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J DATE : 12th OCTOBER, 2022. P.C. 1] Since the offences invoke against the Applicant are under the provisions of POCSO Act, let the complainant be added as party-Respondent No.2. 2] After necessary amendment is being carried out, Issue notice to Respondent No.2 returnable on 29.11.2022. 3] Let the learned APP intimate the complainant through the Investigating Officer about her impleadment in the application and also apprise her of her right of being represented through counsel of her choice or through legal aid. [BHARATI DANGRE, J]

Order - Status 6: Urmila Ingale IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2022.11.30 10:52:53 +0530 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2501 OF 2021 Mr. Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik ..Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Ms. Mayuri D. Hatl,e for applicant. Ms. P.N. Dabholkar, APP for respondent-State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 29, 2022 P.C. : 1. The Learned APP submits that the complainant has been served and she wants to be represented through legal aid. Mr. Akshay Pai is requested to appear on behalf of the complainant and represent her. 2. List the matter on 06/12/2022. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 6th December, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 16/12/2022 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Ms. Mayuri D. Hatle for Applicant. Ms. G. P. Mulekar, APP for State. Mr. Akshay Pai for Respondent No. 2 CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 16th December, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 20/12/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 20th December, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 05/01/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2501 OF 2021 SAGAR @ SANGPAL GULABRAO JAMNIK ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS ------------ Ms. Mayuri D. Hatle for the applicant. Mr. Akshay Pai for respondent No.2. Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the State. ------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : JANUARY 5, 2023. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application. A request is made to expedite the trial as the applicant is in custody since 22/09/2020. The FIR is lodged on 28/07/2020. Considering that the applicant is in custody for more than 2 years and 3 months, the trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of six months from today. In any case, considering that the applicant is incarcerated for this long a period, the trial Court is requested to record the evidence of the child within a period of one month from the date when this order is produced on record. 3. Liberty to apply for bail in case the trial does not substantially proceed during the period of six months from today. 4. Subject to what is observed hereinabove, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of. 5. I appreciate the assistance rendered by Mr. Pai, learned advocate, who was requested to appear on behalf of the victim. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik Versus...Applicant ...RespondentThe State Of Maharashtra...Respondent ____ None for the Applicant Ms. Anamika Mlahotra, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : $28^{text{th}}$ AUGUST 2023. P.C. : The letter dated 5 th July 2023 is received from District Judge-7 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for extension of one year time for disposal of Special (POCSO) Case No. 506/2020. Considering the reasons mentioned in the letter, one year time is extended to dispose of Special (POCSO) Case No. 506/2020. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 594 OF 2021 …...... …...... Atul Hanumant Kale … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent None for the Applicant. Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 17 JANUARY 2023 P.C. :- . The Registry has received this application through jail. The notification which was issued to release under-trial prisoners on bail in view of Covid-19 pandemic has ceased to exist. The present application for bail on that ground thus does not survive and the same is disposed of. ( N.R. BORKAR, J. ) KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI Digitally signed by KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI Date: 2023.01.17 18:21:02 +0530 Kanchan P Dhuri 1 / 1

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 6: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 8: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 10: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 10: agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.783 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.706 OF 2004 Laxman @ Bhimgonda Appaya Patil ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr.S.A. Ingawala for the petitioner. Mrs.P.P. Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM : A.M. Khanwilkar, & U.D. Salvi, JJ. DATE : 7th September 2010. P.C. : This application through jail is filed for expediting the hearing of the appeal. The appeal pertains to the year 2004. Presently the matters under caption 'convicts in jail' have been given precedence as per the assignment. Office is directed to list the appeal under caption 'convicts in jail' as per its turn, provided the same ready for hearing in all respects. If the appeal is unready, the Advocate for the appellant may take steps as may be advised for making the appeal ready to proceed. The criminal application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (U.D. Salvi, J.) (A.M. Khanwilkar, J.)

Order - Status 6: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1625 OF 2012 ...... ...... Rajesh Panth Singh ...Appellant Versus Ajitbahadur B.Singh & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Shrishail Sakhare for Appellant None for Respondents CORAM :- A.H.JOSHI, J. DATED :- MAY 2, 2013 This is an appeal by claimant on the ground that his claim for compensation has been rejected. The rejection is on the ground that the workman has failed to prove that the accident arose in the course of employment. Heard. Admit on following substantial question of law: "In absence of rebuttal by legal evidence, could the evidence on oath given by the claimant on the point that he was engaged to work on the motor vehicle be discarded?" (A.H.JOSHI, J.)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1625 OF 2012 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI REGISTRAR (JUDL – II) Date : 23rd December, 2013 S.O. to 4 weeks for payment of Bhatta charges, furnishing copies & printing charges. If it is complied, issue Notices to Respondents returnable after 10 weeks. sd/­ Registrar (Judl.­II) dsm – R(J­II) – 23.12.13

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J. DATED : 24th JANUARY, 2019. P.C.: In following matters, printing dispensed with. Appellant(s) to supply requisite copies of the paper-book in accordance with Rule 10(iii) of Chapter VII read with Rule I of Chapter IX of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. However, if any party insists and/or the Roznama and interrogatories and their replies, if any, are necessary and will be required at the time of hearing of the appeal, only then those documents be included in the paper-book. In all other cases inclusion of those documents are dispensed with. The paper-book as aforesaid be supplied within eight weeks, failing which appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the Court. Appellant(s) to remove other office objection(s), if any, within eight weeks from today, filing which the appeal will stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the court. Sr.No. FA No. Sr.No. FA No. Sr.No. FA.No. 923 336/198 924 387/1991 925 155/1992 926 470/92 927 881/1992 928 914/1992 929 1100/1992 930 370/1993 931 489/1993 932 81/1994 933 83/1994 934 88/1994 935 167/1994 936 240/1994 937 411/1994 938 652/1994 939 691/1994 940 751/1994 941 823/1994 942 999/1994 943 1007/1994 944 1010/1994 945 1104/1994 946 83/1995 947 92/1995 948 138/1995 949 140/1995 950 183/1995 951 246/1995 952 288/1995 953 310/1995 954 334/1995 955 459/1995 956 502/1995 957 534/1995 958 550/1995 959 580/1995 960 596/1995 961 648/1995 962 698/1995 963 702/1995 964 709/1995 965 846/1995 966 858/1995 967 860/1995 968 917/1995 969 942/1995 970 1058/1995 971 1073/1995 972 1079/1995 1080/1995 1081/1995 1082/1995 1983/1995 1084/1995 1085/1995 1085/1995 973 1138/1995 974 95/1996 975 172/1996 976 227/1996 977 599/1996 978 729/1996 979 772/1996 980 776/1996 981 862/1996 982 902/1996 983 971/1996 984 1107/1996 985 1164/1996 986 1181/1996 987 1220/1996 988 1273/1996 989 1308/1996 990 1515/1996 991 1589/1996 992 1630/1996 993 1661/1996 994 1694/1996 995 8/1997 996 88/1997 997 250/1997 998 311/1997 999 399/1997 1000 434/1997 1001 436/1997 1002 467/1997 1003 496/1997 1004 576/1997 1005 595/1997 1006 607/1997 1007 639/1997 1008 646/1997 1009 647/1997 1010 655/1997 1011 673/1997 1012 684/1997 1013 696/1997 1014 749/1997 1015 839/1997 1016 870/1997 1017 875/1997 1018 878/1997 1019 891/1997 1020 899/1997 1021 910/1997 1022 917/1997 1023 930/1997 1024 983/1997 1025 984/1997 1026 1006/1997 1027 1018/1997 1028 1086/1997 1029 1094/1997 1030 1095/1997 1031 1172/1997 1032 1178/1997 1033 1183/1997 1034 1198/1997 1035 1204/1997 1036 46/1998 1037 60/1998 1038 61/1998 1039 62/1998 1040 63/1998 1041 64/1998 1042 65/1998 1043 67/1998 1044 69/1998 1045 70/1998 1046 71/1997 1047 73/1998 1048 92/1998 1049 112/1998 1050 126/1998 1051 127/1998 1052 129/1998 1053 130/1998 1054 131/1998 1055 132/1998 1056 133/1998 1057 135/1998 1058 142/1998 1059 147/1998 1060 151/1998 1061 218/1998 1062 220/1998 1063 281/1998 1064 286/1998 1065 313/1998 1066 315/1998 1067 331/1998 1068 364/1998 1069 416/1998 1070 430/1998 1071 479/1998 1072 481/1998 1073 484/1998 1074 508/1998 1075 518/1998 1076 520/1998 1077 526/1998 1078 531/1998 1079 588/1998 1080 589/1998 1081 614/1998 1082 634/1998 1083 647/1998 1084 649/1998 1085 669/1998 1086 670/1998 1087 672/1998 1088 680/1998 1089 796/1998 1090 798/1998 1091 802/1998 1092 1086/1998 1093 1090/1998 1094 1134/1998 1095 1160/1998 1096 1170/1998 1097 1171/1998 1098 1172/1998 1099 1173/1998 1100 1175/1998 1101 1325/1998 1102 941/2000 1103 337/2001 1104 919/2001 1105 1157/2003 1106 91/2004 1107 104/2004 105/2004 1108 116/2004 1109 124/2004 1110 190/2004 1111 400/2004 1112 448/2004 1113 454/2004 1114 487/2004 1115 497/2004 1116 586/2004 1117 607/2004 1118 624/2004 1119 627/2004 1120 636/2004 1121 637/1004 1122 638/2004 1123 665/2004 1124 1/2005 1125 2/2005 3/2005 5/2005 7/2005 1126 13/2005 1127 16/2005 1128 19/2005 1129 41/2005 1130 50/2005 1131 51/2005 52/2005 1132 68/2005 1133 83/2005 1134 90/2005 91/2005 92/2005 93/2005 96/2005 97/2005 99/2005 100/2005 101/2005 102/2005 103/2005 1135 465/2005 1136 1572/2009 1137 221/2010 1138 222/2010 1139 223/2010 224/2010 225/2010 226/2010 227/2010 228/2010 229/2010 1140 352/2010 353/2010 354/2010 355/2010 356/2010 357/2010 358/2010 1141 397/2010 230/2010 231/2010 232/2010 233/2010 234/2010 235/2010 236/2010 237/2010 238/2010 239/2010 240/2010 359/2010 360/2010 361/2010 362/2010 363/2010 364/2010 365/2010 366/2010 367/2010 368/2010 369/2010 370/2010 371/2010 372.2010 373/2001 374/2010 375/2010 1142 404/2010 1143 405/2010 1144 406/2010 1145 407/2010 1146 408/2010 1147 409/2010 1148 410/2010 1149 415/2020 1150 622/2010 1151 624/2010 1152 625/2010 1153 665/2010 1154 667/2010 1155 670/2010 1156 692/2010 1157 694/2010 1158 819/2010 1159 820/2010 1160 821/2010 1161 822/2010 1162 855/2010 856/2010 857/2010 960/2010 1163 866/2010 1164 872/2010 1165 876/2010 965/2010 966/2010 1166 929/2010 1167 972/2010 1168 974/2010 1169 1044/2010 1170 1061/2010 1171 1065/2010 1172 1068/2010 1173 1070/2010 1174 1075/2010 1175 1080/2010 1176 1222/2010 1177 1226/2010 1227/2010 1228/2010 1229/2010 1230/2010 1231/2010 1232/2010 1233/2010 1234/2010 1235/2010 1236/2010 1237/2010 1238/2010 1239/2010 1240/2010 1241/2010 1242/2010 1243/2010 1244/2010 1245/2010 1178 1253/2010 1179 1262/2010 1180 1265/2010 1181 1267/2010 1182 1268/2010 1183 1903/2010 1185 19/2011 1186 33/2011 1187 35/2011 1188 52/2011 1189 53/2011 1190 54/2011 1191 112/2011 1192 114/2011 1193 121/2011 1194 129/2011 1195 138/2011 1196 144/2011 1197 165/2011 1198 198/2011 1199 202/2011 1200 204/2011 1201 283/2011 1203 290/2011 1204 318/2011 1205 322/2011 1206 333/2011 1207 336/2011 1208 344/2011 1209 372/2011 1210 413/2011 1211 435/2011 1212 452/2011 1213 459/2011 1214 460/2011 1215 514/2011 1216 520/2011 1217 521/2011 1218 526/2011 1219 542/2011 1220 545/2011 1221 548/2011 1222 555/2011 1223 556/2011 1224 1975/2011 1225 4/2012 1226 7/2012 1227 31/2012 1228 33/2012 1229 36/2012 1230 43/2012 1231 45/2012 1232 71/2012 1233 101/2012 1234 155/2012 1235 158/2012 1236 164/2012 1237 193/2012 1238 195/2012 1239 212/2012 1240 216/2012 1241 245/2012 1242 246/2012 1243 248/1012 1245 268/2012 1246 276/2012 1247 291/2012 1248 293/2012 1249 298/2012 1250 300/2012 1251 323/2012 1252 338/2012 1253 345/2012 1254 348/2012 1255 349/2012 1256 351/2012 1257 359/2012 1258 363/2012 1259 366/2012 1260 367/2012 1261 373/2012 1262 386/2012 1263 408/2012 1264 409/2012 1265 410/2012 1266 418/2012 1267 453/2012 1268 482/2012 391/2012 1269 489/2012 1270 544/2012 1271 549/2012 1272 553/2012 1273 570/2012 1274 571/2012 1275 572/2012 1276 587/2012 1277 618/2012 1278 633/2012 1279 638/2012 1280 639/2012 1281 644/2012 1282 646/2012 1283 652/2012 1284 654/2012 1285 703/2012 1286 753/2012 1287 755/2012 1288 786/2012 1289 797/2012 1290 799/2012 1291 805/2012 1292 822/2012 1293 835/2012 1294 839/2012 1295 876/2012 1296 878/2012 1297 882/2012 1298 935/2012 1299 937/2012 1300 953/2012 1301 970/2012 1302 984/2012 1303 991/2012 1304 998/2012 1305 1022/2012 1306 1038/2012 1307 1054/2012 1308 1058/2012 1309 1059/2012 1310 1090/2012 1311 1101/2012 1312 1102/2012 1313 1112/2012 1314 1131/2012 1315 1132/2012 1242/2012 1242/2012 1316 1145/2012 1317 1153/2012 1318 1162/2012 1319 1198/2012 1320 1226/2012 1321 1239/2012 1322 1260/2012 1323 1261/2012 1324 1267/2012 1325 1279/2012 1326 1282.2012 1327 1291/2012 1328 1309/2012 1329 1314/2012 1330 1331/2012 1331 1338/2012 1332 1419/2012 1333 1479/2012 1334 1523/2012 1336 1586/2012 1337 1591/2012 1338 1613/2012 1339 1622/2012 1340 1624/2012 1341 1625/2012 1342 1628/2012 1343 1652/2012 1344 1660/2012 1345 1662/2012 1347 17/2013 1348 18/2013 1349 25/2013 1350 26/2013 1351 37/2013 1352 38/2013 1353 43/2013 1354 45/2013 1355 57/2013 1356 59/2013 1357 68/2013 1358 69/2013 1359 73/2013 1360 76/2013 1361 79/2013 1362 82/2013 1363 83/2013 1364 85/2013 1365 86/2013 1366 122/2013 1367 128/2013 1368 155/2013 1369 167/2013 1370 244/2013 1371 284/2013 1372 285/2013 1373 286/2013 1374 287/2013 1375 288/2013 1376 289/2013 1377 290/2013 1378 315/2013 1379 316/2013 1381 322/2013 1382 332/2013 1383 333/2013 1384 334/2013 1385 335/2013 1386 336/2013 1387 337/2013 1388 338/2013 1389 339/2013 1390 340/2013 1391 341/2013 1392 343/2013 1393 378/2013 1394 384/2013 1395 391/2013 1396 408/3024 1397 416/2013 1398 442/2013 1399 445/2013 1400 447/2013 1401 451/2013 1402 456/2013 1403 460/2013 1404 485/2013 1405 490/2013 1406 492/2013 1407 494/2013 1408 512/2013 1409 515/2013 1410 542/2013 1411 546/2013 1412 547/2013 1413 553/2013 1414 555/2013 1415 562/2013 1416 565/2013 1417 577/2013 1418 585/2013 1419 598/2013 1420 601/2013 1421 603/2013 1422 605/2013 1423 609/2013 1424 611/2013 1425 645/2013 1426 650/2013 1427 672/2013 1428 685/2013 1429 704/2013 1430 708/2013 1431 713/2013 1432 725/2013 1433 743/2013 1435 785/2013 1436 790/2013 1437 791/2013 1438 803/2013 1439 851/2013 1440 872/2013 1441 874/2013 1442 895/2013 1443 918/2013 1444 937/2013 1445 938/2013 1446 939/2013 1447 940/2013 1448 941/2013 1449 942/2013 1450 943/2013 1451 944/2013 1452 945/2013 1453 946/2013 1454 947/2013 1455 948/2013 1456 949/2013 1457 950/2013 1458 951/2013 1459 952/2013 1460 953/2013 1461 954/2013 1462 955/2013 1463 956/2013 1464 957/2013 1465 958/2013 1466 997/2013 1467 1012/2013 1468 1035/2013 1469 1036/2013 1470 1053/2013 1471 1071/2013 1472 1090/2013 1473 1094/2013 1474 1121/2013 1475 1135/2013 1476 1144/2013 1477 1156/2013 1478 1157/2013 1479 1170/2013, 1171/2013, 1172/2013, 1480 1175/2013, 2273/3024 1481 1209/2013 1482 1215/2013 1483 1250/2013 1484 1286/2013 1485 1288/2013 1486 1290/2013 1487 1297/2013 1488 1298/2013 1489 1337/2013, 1490 1353/2013 1491 1375/2013 1492 1376/2013 1493 1385/2013 1494 1387/2013 1495 1396/2013 [ DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 ... ordersOrders. or directions and Registrar's orders. OfficeCourt's Notes, Office Memorada or Judge's Mr. A.K.Abhyankar , P.S.Dani with H.N.Vakil i/b. M/s. Mulla & Mulla for the petitioners. Shri R.D.Rane GP for Respdt.5. CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.M.KANADE, J. DTAED: 11TH AUGUST, 2006. P.C. To Rule. 1. be heard with W.P. of 2003. No.2697 . Status Status-quo wi continued be with liberty to get ers in interim or appropriate interim orders in in this case.

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4503 OF 2006 TATA MOTORS LIMITED )...PETITIONER V/s. PIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUNICIPAL CORP. ) AND ORS. )...RESPONDENTS Mr.H.N.Vakil i/b. M/s.Mulla & Mulla and Craigie Blunt and Caroe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.S.B.Kalel, AGP for the Respondent State. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & A. M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 14th JULY 2017 P.C. : 1 Issue fresh notice to respondent nos.1 to 4, returnable on 11th August 2017. The learned AGP appears for respondent no.5. (A. M. BADAR, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA), J.)

Order - Status 11: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Rushi Mathur instructed by M/s Mulla and Mulla Co. and Craige Blunt and Caroe is present. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) Date : 13 SEPTEMBER 2017 Await service to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 for four weeks i.e. 11.10.2017. S.O. to 12.10.2017. REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) RJ I gpj / 13.09.2017

Order - Status 13: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. H.W. Vakil a/w Ms. S.M. Vakil and Mr. Andre Shah instructed by Mulla and Mulla CBC, Advocate for Petitioner is present. CORAM :A.N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) Date : 12 OCTOBER 2017 Await service to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 for four weeks (excluding diwali vacation) i.e. 23.11.2017. S.O. to 24.11.2017. REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) RJ I gpj / 12.10.2017

Order - Status 31: VAI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 Tata Motors Limited …Petitioner Versus Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation And Ors. ..Respondents Mr P. S. Dani, Senior Advocate , a/w Mr. H. N. Vakil a/w Mr. Samkit Shah i/by Mulla and Mulla and Craigie Blunt & Caroe for the Petitioner. Ms S. S. Bhende , A.G.P. for the Respondent – State. CORAM: M.S. Sonak & Kamal Khata, JJ DATED: 27th August 2024 PC:- 1. Place this matter along with Writ Petition No.2697 of 2003 on 19th November 2024. If full Bench has decided earlier, liberty to apply. (Kamal Khata, J) (M.S. Sonak, J) VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2024.08.30 12:04:10 +0530

Order - Status 33: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 _______ _______ Tata Motors Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents None for Petitioner. Ms. M. P. Thakur, AGP for State. CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATE: 27 JUNE 2025 P.C. None for the petitioner. As a matter of last chance, stand over to 04 July 2025. In the event, the petitioner is not represented on the adjourned date of hearing, there shall be no alternative but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 _________ __________ Tata Motors Limited ...Petitioner Vs. Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents None for the Petitioner. Ms. S. A. Prabhune, AGP for the Respondent-State. CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATE: 04 JULY 2025. MUGDHA MANOJ PARANJAPE Digitally signed by MUGDHA MANOJ PARANJAPE Date: 2025.07.07 12:09:33 +0530 P.C. On 27th June 2025 we had passed the following order :- "1. None for the petitioner. As a matter of last chance, stand over to 04 July 2025. In the event, the petitioner is not represented on the adjourned date of hearing, there shall be no alternative but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution." Today again the Petitioner is not represented. Considering our aforesaid order, it clearly appears that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this Petition. It is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.190 OF 2018 ..... .... The State of Maharashtra ... Applicant V/s. Shri.Mithun Balaso Sawant & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Applicant/State. CORAM : A.M.BADAR J. DATED : 20th JULY 2018. P.C. : 1 Issue notice to respondents returnable on 14th September 2018. (A.M.BADAR J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.190 OF 2018 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...APPLICANT V/s. MITHUN BALASO SAWANT AND ANR. )...RESPONDENTS Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Applicant – State. Mr.Sharad Mulik, Advocate for the Respondent State. CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 15th OCTOBER 2018 P.C. : 1 This is an application for condonation of delay in preferring an application for leave to appeal. What is sought to be challenged is acquittal of the respondents in Special Case registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. 2 Heard the learned APP appearing for the State as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. He argued that carelessness of the State is reflected from the fact that neither the name of the court nor the other particulars are properly mentioned in the instant application. The same is therefore liable to be rejected. 3 I have considered the submissions so advanced. The delay occurred is that of 21 days. Leaving apart the misdescription of the court and other particulars in the application, sufficient cause is shown for the short delay of 21 days in filing the application for leave to appeal. Hence, the order : ORDER i) The application is allowed. ii) The delay in filing the application for leave to appeal is condoned. iii) The application is accordingly disposed off. (A. M. BADAR, J.)