All Cases

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1541/2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.1236/2015 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - Mr. N. M. Bhole for the Applicant CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2015 P.C.: Heard. This Application is made by the Plaintiff for condonation of 8 days delay in filing the appeal challenging the decree dated 08/09/2014 passed by the Appellate Court in civil appeal NO.164/2008. Rule. Rule made returnable after 12 weeks. In addition to usual mode of service, Applicant is permitted to serve Respondents by private notice either by registered post A.D. and/or by hand delivery and file Affidavit of Service to that effect. JUDGE

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL.II) DATE : 18th November, 2015 One week time granted to supply copies for issuing notice to Respondent. REGISTRAR (JUDL.II)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL.II) DATE : 30th November, 2015 S.O. one week time granted to supply copies for issuing notice to Respondents, as a last chance. REGISTRAR (JUDL.II)

Order - Status 8: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL.II) DATE : 14th December, 2015 S.O. two weeks time granted to supply copies failing which this Civil Application stand disposed of without reference to the Court. REGISTRAR (JUDL.II)

Order - Status 10: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL.II) DATE : 7th January 2016 Issue notice to Respondent, returnable date is extended by eight (8) weeks. REGISTRAR (JUDL.II)

Order - Status 12: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders Adv. for Appellant present CORAM : A.N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDLII) Date : 3/03/2016 S.O. three (3) weeks time granted to take steps against unserved R.No.1. REGISTRAR (JUDLII)

Order - Status 14: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders None present CORAM : A.N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDLII) Date : 28/03/2016 S.O. three (3) weeks i.e. 18/04/2016 time granted to take steps against deceased Respondent No.1. sd/ REGISTRAR (JUDLII)

Order - Status 16: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders CORAM : A.N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDLII) Date : 18/04/2016 None present Three weeks (excluding Summer Vacation) time granted to take steps as a last chance. sd/ REGISTRAR (JUDLII)

Order - Status 18: THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Civil Application No. 1541 of 2015 In Second Appeal Stamp No. 1236 of 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders CORAM : A.N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDL.II) Date : 07/06/2016. Advocate for the Applicant is present. S.O. for three (3) weeks time granted to take steps regarding deceased R. No. 1. sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

Order - Status 20: Sequeira IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 in SECOND APPEAL (St.) NO. 1236 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's order or Directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr.Nilesh Bhole, for the Applicant. Mr.Harshad Shingnapurkar i/b Mr.Rohit Joshi, for Respondent No.2. CORAM: Jamdar N M J , Friday July 2016 1 , C P .: The Civil Application is abated as against Respondent No.1. The learned counsel for the Applicant seeks time. Stand over to eight weeks, i.e. 26 August 2016. (N Jamdar ) M J ,

Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO.1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil ....Applicant vs. Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. ....Respondents .... Mr. N.M. Bhole, for the Applicant. Mr. Rohit Joshi, for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J. DATED : 20 JANUARY 2017 P.C. : . Learned Counsel for the Applicant informs the Court that Respondent No.1 is dead and that he will take appropriate steps to bring legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.1 on record. Stand over to 17 February 2017. ( S.C. GUPTE, J. )

Order - Status 27: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.1236 OF 2015 ….. Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil … Applicant Versus Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil & Anr. … Respondents ….. Mr. Nilesh Bhole for the Applicant. Mr. Akshay Kandarkar i/b Rohit Joshi for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J. DATE : 17 FEBRUARY 2017 P.C. : Learned Counsel for the Applicant/Appellant states that the Respondent has died and his application for bringing legal heirs of the deceased Respondent on record is ready but not yet moved. He seeks time for the purpose. This Civil Application accordingly stood over to 24 March 2017. (S.C.GUPTE, J.)

Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 1541 OF 2015 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil ....Applicant V/S Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. ....Respondent None For Applicant Ms. Aditi Athawale i/b. Rohit D Joshi For Respondent No. 2. CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J DATE : 24th March, 2017 P.C. : None for the applicant, stand over to 21/04/2017 as a last chance. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 31: Rane (sr.58) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application in SA NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN Second Appeal (ST) NO. 1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil ...Applicant Versus Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. ...Respondents None for the Applicant, Appellant. Mr. Rohit Joshi, Advocate for Respondent no.2. CORAM: N.M. JAMDAR, J DATED: 21st April, 2017 PC:- . None for the Applicant. By order dated 1 July, 2016 it is recorded that Civil Application is abated as against Respondent no.1. Time was taken to take steps. No steps have been yet taken. The Application stands dismissed as against Respondent no.1. Stand over to next CMIS date i.e. 30 June, 2017. The Applicant will explain whether the Civil Application survives in view of dismissal of the Application as against Respondent no.1. (N.M. JAMDAR,J.)

Order - Status 33: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 1541 OF 2015 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil Applicant V/S Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. Respondent Nilesh Bhole For Applicant/Appellent Rohit Joshi Respondent No. 2 CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J DATE : 1st July, 2017 P.C. : In view of the joint request made by the learned Counsel for the parties, stand over to 07/07/2017 under the caption for High on Board. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 35: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 1236 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 12068 OF 2017 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil … Applicant Versus Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil and another … Respondents Mr. Nilesh Bhole for the Applicant in both C.A./Appellant. Mr. Rohit Joshi for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 7TH JULY, 2017 P.C.: Stand over to 10.07.2017, high on Board. ( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )

Order - Status 37: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 1541 OF 2015 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil ....Applicant V/S Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. ....Respondent Nilesh Bhole For Applicant Rohit Joshi for Respondent No. 2 CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J DATE : 10th July, 2017 P.C. : At the request of the learned Counsel for the Appellent, stand over to 18/07/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 39: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 1541 OF 2015 In SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil ....Applicant V/S Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA STAMP NO. 12068 OF 2017 In SECOND APPEAL LODGING NO . 1236 OF 2015 Sou. Rohini Sudhakar Patil ....Applicant V/S Shri. Ramchandra Kashinath Patil And Anr. ....Respondent Nilesh Bhole For Applicant/Appellent Rohit Joshi for Respondent No. 2 CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J DATE : 18th July, 2017 P.C. : At the request of the learned Counsel for the Application, stand over to 19/07/2017 under the caption for First on Board. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 43: kpd 1 / 1 912CAS15412015.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1541 OF 2015 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 1236 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 12068 OF 2017 Mrs.Rohini Sudhakar Patil … Applicant Versus Shri.Ramchandra Kashinath Patil and another … Respondents Mr.Nilesh Bhole for the Applicant and Appellant. Mr.Rohit Joshi for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 19th JULY, 2017 P.C.: The Learned Advocate appearing for the Applicant on instructions seeks to withdraw the above Second Appeal. The above Second Appeal alongwith both the above Civil Applications are disposed off as withdrawn. ( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5481 OF 2006. Mr.Prashant Tukaram Kshirsagar. ... Petitioner. V/s. Mrs.Meenakshi Prashant Kshirsagar. ... Respondent. Uday P. Warunjikar for the petitioner. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 21st September 2006. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. . Perused petition. On the motion made by learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition. During the course of hearing and from the impugned order, it appears that lot many interim applications are pending for adjudication before the Family Court. It is, therefore, necessary to indicate that before implementing the impugned order, the Family Court shall dispose of all the pending applications; after hearing the parties; as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. All these applications may be disposed of either by common order or by separate orders, based on common hearing, as the Family Court may deem fit in exercise of its own discretion. With the aforesaid directions, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.)

#VALUE!

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2012 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders Mr.Sudhir Sakpal h/f.Mr.S.M.Suryawanshi for the Applicant. Ms.V.R.Bhosale, APP for the State/R2. CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 2nd March, 2012. P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned APP for Respondent No.2/State. Issue notice to Respondent No.1, returnable after four weeks. (R.G.KETKAR, J.)

Order - Status 14: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2012 M/s. Lalit Construction .Applicant V/s. Rakesh Roshan & anr. .Respondents None for the Applicant Mr.Y.M.Nakhawa, APP, for Respondent No.2 - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 12TH JUNE, 2012 P.C. . None for the applicant even on second call. Criminal Application is dismissed for want of prosecution. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1831 OF 2017 In FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 13947 OF 2017 The New India Assurance Co.ltd.through Applicant Centralized Motor Tp Claims Hub V/S Mr. Ashok Dayabji Ramparia And Anr. Respondent CORAM : G.S. PATEL, J DATE : 11th July, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned, Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 19/07/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1831 OF 2017 In FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 13947 OF 2017 The New India Assurance Co.ltd.through Applicant Centralized Motor Tp Claims Hub V/S Mr. Ashok Dayabji Ramparia And Anr. Respondent CORAM : G.S. PATEL, J DATE : 19th July, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned, Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 23/08/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: Shephali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 13947 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1831 OF 2017 The New India Assurance Co Ltd …Appellant Versus Ashik Dayabji Ramparia & Ors …Respondents Mr Devendranath S Joshi *, for the Appellant/Applicant.* Mrs Varsha Chavan *, for the Respondents Nos. 1 to 4.* CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 27th July 2017 PC:- 1. The facts are set out in the judgment delivered today in First Appeal No. 1 of 2015. Here the claimant was the rider of the motorcycle. His father, who was riding pillion, died in the same accident. 2. The same issue as regards the permit was taken in this case. I have rejected the submission. The present case is one of injury. The claimant was admitted to the Sanjivani Hospital on 2nd November 2006. He was operated for a fracture and he was an indoor patient till 17th November 2006. He submitted his medical bills. He had a grade II compound fracture of the humerus with rapid nerve palsy, abrasion and other injuries. He says he has difficulty in moving. He has had body implants. He is unable to carry on his effective work as a mason. His permanent partial disability was estimated at 48% based on the evidence of one Dr Naresh Khanna. The Tribunal awarded him Rs. 25,000/- towards future medical expenses and then proceeded to award an amount of Rs. 3,93,000/- as compensation including NFL. 3. In my view, there is really no reason to interfere with any part of the award. The MACT has correctly assessed every aspect of it including taking into account that the fracture was to the right hand and, therefore, taken a slightly higher amount towards the disability compensation. 4. I do not think it is possible to fault the conclusions of the Tribunal. The principles that have been established by the Supreme Court in Arvind Kumar Mishra vs New India Assurance Co Ltd ** 1 ** regarding the duty of the Court to provide reasonable restitution to the claimant have been followed in letter and in spirit. 5. The statutory deposit of Rs. 25,000/- is to be transferred to the MACT, Mumbai within two weeks from today. 6. The claimant is entitled to withdraw the entire amount with all accrued interest. The MACT will permit such withdrawal on production of an authenticated copy of this order. 1 (2010) 10 SCC 254. 7. The appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. 8. The civil application does not survive and is disposed of as infructuous. (G. S. PATEL, J)