All Cases

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1580 OF 2004. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or Judge's orders. orders or directions and Registrar's orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Nitin Pradhan for the Petitioner. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2-State. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED : 16th June, 2005. P.C.: Issue notice to the Respondent returnable on 5th August 2005. The learned A.P.P. waives service for Respondent No.2. In addition to service through Court the Advocate for the Petitioner to serve private notice. Judge.

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1580 OF 2004 Nasari Dairy Products Ltd. ...Petitioner vs. Smt.Shobhadevi ...Respondents Shinde & anr. Mr.Prakash Nail for the petitioner Mr.Y.S.Shinde A.P.P. for State None for the Respondent No.1. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JULY 31,2008 P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner filed a private complaint in the court of Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Gadhinglaj in which process was issued. The process was issued only for two offences under section 323 and 147 of the Indian Penal Code. In a petition filed by the petitioner, this court has interfered and directed that the process should be issued against the Respondents for other offences under the Companies Act and Indian Penal Code. By order dated 8th July 2002, the learned Magistrate passed an order of discharge by exercising power under sub section 2 of section 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973. The order of discharge was passed as the Petitioner failed to appear and adduce evidence. A revision application preferred by the petitioner against the said order was rejected by the learned Magistrate. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was diligently prosecuting the complaint and in fact the petitioner was in a position to adduce evidence. He submitted that if an opportunity is granted, the petitioner is in a position to adduce evidence to substantiate the charges. He, therefore, submitted that by setting aside the impugned order, the complaint be remanded. I have considered the submissions. The order dated 21st July 2000 passed by the learned Magistrate shows that the Petitioner was seeking adjournment. When the complaint appeared on board on 20th June 2002, neither the petitioner nor his Advocate were present. The learned Judge passed an order recording that if on the next date the petitioner failed to lead evidence before charge, necessary order will be passed on the complaint. On 8th July 2002, when the complaint came up before the court, the learned Magistrate noted that no evidence has been adduced by the petitioner. The learned Judge referred to his earlier order passed on an application at Exh.42 in which he had observed that the averments made in the complaint and verification recorded therein was not sufficient to frame the charges in absence of any further evidence adduced by the petitioner. As the evidence was not adduced by the petitioner, the learned Judge proceeded to pass an order of discharge by exercising power under sub section 2 of section 245 of the said Code. I find no reason to 2 - interfere with the said order as well as the order of the Sessions Court by which an order of discharge has been confirmed. The complaint was of the year 1996. After granting sufficient opportunities the petitioner could not adduce the evidence. Considering all the aforesaid factual aspects, now it will be unjust to exercise power under Article 227 of Constitution of India or under section 482 of the said Code to interfere at this stage and to permit the petitioner to adduce the evidence. No case is made out for interference. Hence, petition is rejected. JUDGE

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1783 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2023 Harishchandra Rampal Saroj @ Airport … Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents ..... Ms. Veenu Dubey i/b Mr.Anil Dubey, for the Appellant/Applicant. Mr. A.R.Kapadnis, APP, for the Respondent-State. ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 26th JULY, 2023. P.C. It appears from the police report submitted by the Senior Police Inspector, Pant Nagar Police Station to the learned APP that the concerned police personnel had only enquired with the landlord of the victim's parents about the whereabouts of the victim. It seems that there are no efforts made by the concerned police station to trace out and locate the whereabouts of victim and her parents. REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2023.07.28 10:36:50 +0530 2 Learned APP seeks one more opportunity to trace and the location of the victim. 3 At his request, stand over to 9 th August, 2023. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 5: Uday S. Jagtap IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2023 WITH I.A. NOS. 1784 OF 2023 & 1783 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2023 Harischandra Rampal Saroj @ Airport .. Appellant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents ..... Ms. Veenu Dubey i/b Mr. Anil Dubey for the appellant Mr. Jai V. Kanade for the respondent no.2 – appointed Advocate Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, APP for the respondent – State ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 30th AUGUST, 2023 P.C. . At the request of learned Counsel for respondent no.2, list on 13th September, 2023. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.)

Order - Status 6: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1783 OF 2023 a/w INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.562 OF 2023 ….. Harishchandra Rampal Saroj @ Airport ] Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another ] Respondents Ms. Veena Dubey i/b Mr. Anil Dubey, for Applicant. Ms. G.P. Mulekar, A.P.P, for Respondent No.1-State. Ms. Jai V. Kanade, Appointed Advocate, for Respondent No.2. ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 13th September, 2023. P.C. Heard. Reserved for orders. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 8: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.562 OF 2023 Harishchandra Rampal Saroj @ Airport ] Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another ] Respondents ….. Ms. Veenu Dubey i/b Mr. Anil Dubey, for Applicant. Ms. G.P. Mulekar, A.P.P, for Respondent No.1-State. Ms. Jai V. Kanade, Appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2. ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. RESERVED ON : 13.09.2023 PRONOUNCED ON : 15.09.2023 ORDER: . In view of disposal of Interim Application No.1783 of 2023, this application stands disposed of. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale ••• Petitioner Versus District Collect, Pune & Ors. ••• Respondents Mr. Manoj Badgujar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA & MADHAV J. JAMDAR,JJ. DATED : JUNE 8, 2022 P.C. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is armed with a decree of civil Court. The suit for partition and separate possession was filed and the suit is decreed. The petitioner is awarded 1/5th share. The petitioner is not concerned with the loan availed by the present respondent No.6. The property in respect of which the decree is passed in favour of the petitioner is sought to be attached under the impugned order passed under Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961. Notice to respondents returnable on 6 th July 2022. The learned AGP waives notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Till next date, the respondent shall not take further coercive steps regarding the share of the petitioner in CTS No.672 i.e. the suit property of Special Civil Suit No. 1727 of 1997 and decree dated $2^{nd}$ May 2008. (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) Gaikwad RD

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale ....PETITIONER V/S District Collector, Collectorate Office, Pune And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R.D. DHANUKA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. G. SEWLIKAR, JJ DATE : 6th July, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 25/08/2022 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale ....PETITIONER V/S District Collector, Collectorate Office, Pune And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R.D. DHANUKA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. G. SEWLIKAR, JJ DATE : 6th July, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 25/08/2022 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: Amol IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale V/s.PetitionerDistrict Collector, Collectorate Office, Pune & Ors.Respondent. .... Mr. Manoj Badgujar a/w. Sagar Kukreja for petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP a/w. A. P. Vanarse, AGP for respondent-State. .... Mr. Hemnat Ghadigaonkar for respondent nos. 3 and 4. CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S PATIL, JJ. DATED : 23 rd FEBRUARY 2023 P.C.: Petition be listed on $15^{th}$ March, 2023. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Order - Status 10: Amol IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale Petitioner V/s. District Collector, Collectorate Office, Pune & Ors. Respondent. Mr. Manoj Badgujar a/w. Sagar Kukreja for petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP a/w. A. P. Vanarse, AGP for respondent-State. .... Mr. Hemnat Ghadigaonkar for respondent nos. 3 and 4. CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S PATIL, JJ. DATED : 23 rd FEBRUARY 2023 P.C.: Petition be listed on $15^{th}$ March, 2023. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Order - Status 11: Amol 1/5 suo moto IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 144 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3053 OF 1999 Union of India & Anr Appellants V/s. Shri. L. P. Netare and 8 Ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 202 OF 2010 IN LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO.144 OF 2010 Union of India & Anr Appellants V/s. Shri. L. P. Netare and 8 Ors. Respondents WITH LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 158 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3061 OF 1997 Union of India & Anr Appellants V/s. A. V. Bonde & Others Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 201 OF 2010 IN LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 158 OF 2010 Union of India & Anr Appellants V/s. A. V. Bonde & Others Respondents AND Amol 2/5 suo moto WRIT PETITION NO. 3146 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1301 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3146 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 4655 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3146 OF 2022 Miss Rekha Premchand Safari & Anr. Petitioners V/s. Upnibandha Sahakari Sanstha & Anr Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale Petitioner V/s. District Collector, Collectorate Office, Pune & Ors. Respondent. AND LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 203 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4647 OF 2011 Mahapalika Kamgar Sabha Appellant V/s. Sangli Miraj Kupwad Cities Municipal Corporation Respondent. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1805 OF 2017 Shri Sunil Shankar More & Ors. Petitioners V/s. Amol 3/5 suo moto The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondent. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12373 OF 2019 Shri. Arvind Kashinath Kore Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondent. WITH LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 316 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4647 OF 2011 Sangli Miraj Kupwad Cities Municipal Corporation Appellant V/s. Mahapalika Kamgar Sabha Respondent. AND INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 19542 OF 2022 In FIRST APPEAL 78 OF 2014 Thane Municipal Corporation Through Its Commissioner,Thane ....PETITIONER V/S Dr. Dilip Mansukhlal Shah And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 246 of 2014 in FIRST APPEAL NO. 78 of 2014 Shri. Dilip Mansukhlals Shah And Ors. ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Chandrakant Kantilal Shah And Ors. ....RESPONDENT 4/5 suo moto WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1132 of 2019 in FIRST APPEAL NO. 78 of 2014 .... Shri. Sebastian J. Sequeiraand Ors. ....PETITIONER V/S Mr. Dilip Mahasukhlal Shah And Ors. ....RESPONDENT AND LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 337 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6216 OF 2011 .... Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Appellant V/s. Petroleum Employees Union & 24 Ors. Respondents. CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S PATIL, JJ. (In Chamber) DATED : 2 nd March 2023 P.C.: Suo moto called for Speaking to the Minutes of orders dated 23 rd February 2023. 2 In the cause title of orders dated 23 rd February 2023 the words "ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION" be substituted with "CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION" . Amol Amol 5/5 suo moto 3 Rest of the orders remain unaltered. 4 Original orders to be corrected accordingly. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17606 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale ….Petitioner V/s. District Collector, Collectorate Office, Pune and Ors. …Respondents Mr. Manoj Badgujar a/w Mr. Sagar Kursija for Petitioner. Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar for Respondent No.3. Mr. A.I. Patel, Addl. G.P. a/w Mr. A.P. Vanarse, AGP for State. CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 15 th MARCH 2023 P.C. : At the outset Mr. Ghadigaonkar appearing for Respondent No.3 submitted that Rule 107 (19) of The Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 provides for an alternative remedy in the sense if any objection is to be made by any party to the attachment to any property, the party may apply to the Recovery Officer who in this case is Respondent No.4 and Recovery Officer shall investigate the claim or objection and dispose it on merits. Mr. Badgujar for petitioner states that petitioner will file objection before Respondent No.4 within one week to the order of attachment. Mr. Ghadigaonkar states that the Recovery Officer will pass appropriate order within four weeks of receiving the objections and if petitioner requests for a personal hearing, a personal hearing can also be granted. In view of the statement made by Mr. Badgujar and Mr.Ghadigaonkar as above, we dispose the petition. We clarify that we have not made any observations on the merits of the matter. Petition disposed. Mr. Ghadigaonkar states until the objections are decided, it is quite obvious Respondent No.4 will not take any further coercive steps. Consequently, all Interim Applications also stand disposed. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3260 OF 2015 A/W CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3261 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.14661 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. ... Applicant/Appellant Vs. Smt.Shobha Babasaheb Babar & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.M. Dange for the Applicant/Appellant Mr.V.R. Gaikwad for Respondent Nos.1 to 6 CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE: 30th SEPTEMBER, 2015 P.C.: Civil Application No.3260 of 2015 is filed for condonation of delay of 15 days in preferring the appeal. The learned Counsel for the respondent is present. He concedes to the condonation of delay. Hence, this application is allowed. Appeal be numbered. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3261 OF 2015: - By this Civil Application, the applicant / insurance Company seeks stay to the operation and execution of the impugned judgement and award dated 25.11.2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Satara in MACP No.535 of 2012. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the insurance company is ready to deposit the entire decretal amount alongwith interest accrued thereon, within a period of six weeks. In view of the above, interim stay granted to the operation and execution of the impugned judgement and award dated 25.11.2014 subject to the applicant depositing in the MACT, Satara the entire decretal amount alongwith interest accrued thereon, within a period of six weeks from today. The statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited in this Court at the time of filing of appeal shall be transferred to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Satara. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) CERTIFICATE Certified that this Judgment/Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Judgment/Order.

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.6038 OF 2021 Limbaji Bhimrao Thore Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent None present for Petitioner. Mrs.M.H.Mhatre, APP, for State. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI AND PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ. DATE : 16th January 2023 PC : Petitioner has been issued strict warning by Jail Authority for returning one day late to Jail, when he was released on emergency parole leave. Perusal of record indicates that Competent Authority has not committed any error while issuing strict warning to the Petitioner for his returning late to Jail Authority by one day. The petition is accordingly dismissed. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.S.GADKARI, J.) MST

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2565 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1378 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. S.S.Kulkarni for the Applicant. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 27th July, 2011. P.C. . Rule, returnable on 23rd September, 2011. 2 In addition to service of notice through Court, advocate for the Applicant shall serve private notice by Registered Post A.D. and/or by courier service and/or by hand delivery to the Respondent and shall file affidavit of service one week before the returnable date failing which the application will stand dismissed for nonprosecution. 3 There will be adinterim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition that the Applicant will not create any third party rights and will not part with possession of the suit flat till the further orders. [ A.S.OKA, J ]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2565 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1378 OF 2011 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.Sachin Chavan i/b Mr.S.S.Kulkarni for the Applicant Mr.Pramod Pawar for the respondent CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 23,2011 P.C.: 1 Time is sought by the contesting respondent. Stand over till 16th November 2011. Ad-interim relief granted on 27th July 2011 will continue to operate till further orders. JUDGE ssp

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2565 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1378 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Court's Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. Sachin Chavan i/b Mr. S.S. Kulkarni for the Applicant. Mr. Pramodh Pawar for Respondent. CORAM : K.K.TATED,J. DATE : 20/12/2011. PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application is preferred by the original defendant for stay of the judgment and decree dated 22nd December, 2010 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune in Special Civil Suit No.1808 of 2007 and for injunction restraining respondents from obstructing, interfering and/or in any other manner disturbing the peaceful possession and occupation of the applicant in respect of the suit property described in paragraph 1 of the plaint. This court on 27th July, 2011 granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a). Both the counsel state that ad-interim relief granted on 27th July, 2011 may be continued till the hearing and final disposal of the appeal. By consent, ad-interim granted on 27th July, 2011 is confirmed, same to be continued till the hearing and final disposal of the appeal. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1257 OF 2017 Ramesh Bhimrao Dubale Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Rahul Kadam, i/b Mr.Mr.M.J.Pathan, for the Applicant. Mr.S. H. Yadav, A.P.P for the Respondent-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 20th JUNE, 2017 P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this application, the Applicant seeks his enlargement on bail in connection with C.R.No.94 of 2016 registered with the Samarth Police Station, Pune for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 3, 4 and 7 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the said case. He submitted that the applicant was about 18 years at the relevant time. 4. Learned APP opposed the application. Perused the papers. The complainant is the mother of the prosecutrix. The prosecutrix was about 5 years of age at the relevant time. She has stated that the applicant took her to his house and committed forcible intercourse with her. The incident has taken place on 25th May, 2016 at about 11.00 a.m. and the FIR was lodged on 27th May, 2016. The medical history given to the Doctor is consistent with the prosecutrix's statements recorded under Sections 161 and 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The opinion of the medical doctor shows that there was evidence of torn hymen with peritymenal inflammation which is suggestive of vaginal penetration with no evidence of any injury on any part of the body. Considering the material on record, prima-facie, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence, the Application for bail is rejected and disposed of as such. However, the trial of the applicant is expedited keeping in mind the age of the prosecutrix and not the age of the applicant. It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima facie for deciding the aforesaid application, and the learned Judge shall decide the case on its own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2057 OF 2014 Shrikant Hanmant Bijargi … Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra … Respondent Through post. None for petitioner. Ms. M. H. Mhatre, APP for Respondent-State. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : JUNE 09, 2022 P.C. : . We appoint Advocate Mr. Pranot P. Pawar to represent the petitioner in the petition. Issue notice to the respondent. Ms. Mhatre, learned APP waives service of notice for the respondent and prays for three weeks' time to procure the instructions. At her request, stand over to 06.07.2022. Registry shall handover the complete set of papers to the appointed Advocate Mr. Pranot P. Pawar on or before 27.06.2022. (MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (S. S. SHINDE, J.) Minal Parab

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2057 OF 2014 Shrikant Hanmant Bijargi … Petitioner V/s. The State Of Maharashtra. … Respondent None for Petitioner. Mr. H. J. Dedhia APP, for Respondent-State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI AND MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 28 th SEPTEMBER, 2022. P.C. : At the request of learned APP, stand over to 30th September, 2022. [MILIND N. JADHAV, J.] [A.S. GADKARI, J.]

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2057 OF 2014 Shrikant Hanmant Bijargi ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT None for the Petitioner. Mr. H.J.Dedhia, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ DATE : 30th September, 2022 P.C. : At the request of the learned APP for the Respondent - State, S.O. to 07/10/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2057 OF 2014 Shrikant Hanmant Bijargi … Petitioner V/s. The State Of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. Shashikant P. Chaudhari a/w Mr. Pranot P. Pawar Appointed Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Ajay Patil APP, for Respondent-State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI AND MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 7 th OCTOBER, 2022. P.C. : Learned APP on instructions from Jailor (Grade-I), Yerwada Central Prison, Pune submitted that, Petitioner expired on 6th May, 2017 while undergoing treatment at J. J. Hospital, Mumbai. In view thereof, present Petition is abated and accordingly disposed off. [MILIND N. JADHAV, J.] [A.S. GADKARI, J.]