All Writ Petition (Civil)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2745 OF 2019 Radha Venkatesh Shetty … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. … Respondents Mr. Satyavrat Joshi i/by Mr. Sunil Kamble for the petitioner. Smt. A.S. Pai, APP for the respondent State. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & NITIN R. BORKAR, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 30, 2020 P.C. : Issue notice to respondent returnable on 10/03/2020. Learned APP waives notice for respondent no.1. RPAD/humdast for respondent no. 2. In the meanwhile, petitioner to remove all office objections. If office objections are not removed, petition stall stand dismissed automatically without reference to the court. (NITIN R. BORKAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2745 OF 2019 Radha Venkatesh Shetty ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT MR. SATYAVRAT JOSHI i/by MR. SUNIL SHIVAJI KAMBLE for Petitioner. MR. A. S. Pai, PP for Respondent/State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.S. SHINDE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 12th August, 2021 P.C. : Wrongly on board. Remove from the Board. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2668 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2745 OF 2019 with INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2669 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2745 OF 2019 with WRIT PETITION NO. 2745 OF 2019 Radha Venkatesh Shetty....Applicant/Petitioner.Versus...Applicant/Petitioner.The State of Maharashtra & Another....Respondents. Mr. Somay Pawar i/b Sunil S. Kamble for the Applicant/Petitioner. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. Date : January 7, 2022. [Video Conferencing Mode] P. C. : Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant/ Petitioner submitted that due to certain bonafide reasons, he was unable to remove office objections within the stipulated period and as the office objections were not removed, the petition stood dismissed. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submitted that he is desirous of removing all office objections during the course of day. He further submitted that as such the delay occurred in preferring the application for restoration is also for bonafide reasons and the same was not intentional. In view of the submissions of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant, both the applications are allowed. Delay is condoned. Writ petition is restored to the file. Petition is taken up for hearing. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner has approached this Court seeking quashment of subject FIR; the petition is filed on 20th May 2019 and post filing of petition, the matter proceeded further in the trial Court; and in the ultimate decision of trial Court by the judgment and order, the Petitioner has been acquitted. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that as such the grievance of Petitioner, as raised in the present writ petition, no more survives. In view of the above fact-situation, petition is disposed of. [Anil S. Kilor, J.] [Prasanna B. Varale, J.]

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 704 OF 2019 Mr. Dhulappa Jagannath Shelke And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The Prin. Secretary, The Gen. Administration ....Respondent Dept. And Ors Dr Sudhakar Avhad i/by Mr Chetan R Nagare, Advocate For Petitioner Mr Y S Khochare, AGP for Respondents-State. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 21st January, 2019 P.C. : Stand over to 24/01/2019. Writ Petition No. 92/2019 to be heard along with this Writ Petition. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 704 OF 2019 Dhulappa Jagannath Shelke & ors. Petitioners Versus The Principal Secretary, The Gen. Adminsitration Department & ors. Respondents Mr. Chetan Nagare, I/b Dr. Sudhakar Avhad, for the Petitioner. Mr. Y. S. Khochare, AGP for the State/Respondent. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATED: 25th January, 2019 PC: 1. The Petitioner has directly approached this Court bypassing the alternate remedy available to him of filing an Original Application before the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. 2. The petition is, therefore, rejected with liberty to file an application before the appropriate forum. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1636 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1637 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1638 OF 2011 Mrs.Anita Arora w/o Ashokkumar Arora. ... Petitioner. V/s. State of Maharashtra and another. ... Respondents. Kishor Bhatia for the petitioner. Ms.A.T.Jhaveri, APP for the State. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. DATED : 28th July 2011. P.C. : By these petitions, the petitioner is challenging the order passed by the learned revisional Court thereby condoning the delay in filing the complaint. The discretion has been exercised by the learned revision Court in the interest of justice. As such, no case is made out for interference with the impugned order. All the petitions are, therefore, rejected. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2238 OF 2014 Omprakash Bajrangi Tiwari ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents ********** Mr.M.S. Prasad for Petitioner Mrs. P.H. Kantharia -APP for the State ********** CORAM : V. M. KANADE , & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : JULY 23, 2014 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the learned APP for the State. This petition is filed for quashing of FIR registered by Respondent No.2 for the offence punishable under sections 376 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, which has been registered with the Kurla Police Station vide C.R. No. 23 of 2014. It is submitted that both the Petitioner and Respondent No.2 were adults when the complaint was filed and in the complaint it is alleged that since the Petitioner had given false assurance and promise of marriage, Respondent No.2 had given her consent to have sexual intercourse with him. It is submitted that now the Petitioner and Respondent No.2 have married. Our attention is invited to the marriage certificate which is annexed to the petition. It is submitted that, therefore, now the provisions of section 420 and 376 are not attracted. Secondly, it is submitted that Respondent No.2 has filed an affidavit and has stated that the said vat (WP 2238 of 2014) complaint was filed by her on account of misunderstanding that the Petitioner was not willing to marry her. In the affidavit, she has also stated that this was the mistaken belief since the Petitioner has now married with Respondent No.2 and, therefore, the allegation made by her was on account of misunderstanding. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, we are of the view that the offences punishable under section 420 and 376 are not attracted to the facts of the present case. The ratio of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Narinder Singh & others v. State of Punjab and another [2014 AIR SCW 2065] would squarely apply to the facts of the present case. We have interviewed Respondent No.2. She has stated that they are living happy married life and they are staying separately in a rental premises. We are of the view that the quashing of the FIR and charge-sheet is in the interest of both the Complainant as well as her husband. Hence, the writ petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The FIR which is registered by the Kurla Police Station vide C.R. No.23 of 2014 for the offence punishable under section 376 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, which has resulted in filing of the charge-sheet / Sessions Case pending in the Sessions Court, Mumbai are quashed. Writ Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. [P.D. KODE,J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.] Vaishali Tikam

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR J DATE : 13th July, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 14/07/2023 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala and Associates …Petitioner Versus Nirmal Township "A" Co-operative Housing Society Limited and anr. …Respondents …...... Mr. Girish Godbole a/w Ms. Deepashikha Godbole a/w Kaushtubh Thipsay for the Petitioner. Mr. Shrikant D. Patil for the Respondents. …...... CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 14 JULY 2023 P.C. :- List on 4 August 2023. The parties shall remain present on the next date. ( N.R. BORKAR, J. )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Deepashikha Godbole for Petitioner Mr. Shrikant Dinkar Patil for Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR J DATE : 4th August, 2023 P.C. : By consent S. O. to 25/08/2023 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 22nd August, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 13/09/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B.K. Jhala and Associates .....Petitioner Vs. Nirmal Township A Cooperative Housing Society Ltd and Anr .....Respondents Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/b. Ms. Deepshikha Godbole, for the Petitioner. Mr. Shrikant Dinkar Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr Sanjay D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent No.2. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : rd 23 OCTOBER 2023 P.C. Learned counsels appearing for the parties state that the parties are agreeable to explore the possibility of settlement, and they need some time. Mr. Godbole, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions of the partner of the petitioner, Mr. Kamlesh Jhala, who is present in the court, states that he is willing to discuss and sort out the differences with respect to the area to be transferred to the society. varsha The Chairman of the Society, Mr Borkar Jalinder Namdeo is also present in the Court. He agrees that the society's office bearers shall attend the meeting in the petitioner's office on 29th October 2023. On request of both parties, stand over to 2nd November 2023. [GAURI GODSE, J.]

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala and Associates … Petitioner Vs. Nirmal Township A Co-operative … Respondents Housing Society Ltd. and Another Mr. Girish S. Godbole i/b. Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay and Mr. Deepshikha Godbole for the Petitioner. Mr. Kishore Patil i/b. Mr. Shrikant D. Patil and Mr. Arjun S.Pawar for Respondent No. 1. Ms. M. P. Thakur, AGP for the State. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 5 th FEBRUARY 2024 P.C. Learned counsel for respondent no. 1 seeks some more time as the parties are still exploring possibility of settlement. Stand over to 21st February 2024. To be listed under the caption "For settlement". [GAURI GODSE, J.] RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2024.02.06 14:35:43 +0530

Order - Status 16: 8-wp-8512-2023.doc varsha IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B.K. Jhala and Associates … Petitioner vs. Nirmal Township A Cooperative Housing Society Ltd and Anr … Respondents Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/b. Ms. Deepashikha Godbole, for Petitioner. Mr. Arjun S. Pawar for Respondent no.1. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the State. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATED : 21 st FEBRUARY, 2024 P.C. :- Learned counsel for the respective parties state that parties are still exploring the possibility of settlement and according to them dispute is likely to be settled amicably. Hence, they request for some more time. Stand over to 8th March 2024. To be listed under the caption for 'Settlement'. (GAURI GODSE, J.)

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala and Associates … Petitioner Vs. Nirmal Township A Co-operative … Respondents Housing Society Ltd. and Another Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/b. Mr. Deepshikha Godbole for the Petitioner. Mr. Shrikant D. Patil for Respondent No. 1. Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP for the State. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 8 th MARCH 2024 P.C. Learned counsels for the respective parties submits that talks for amicable settlement are still going on. Hence, they request for some more time. At their request stand over to 15th March 2024. To be listed under the caption "For Settlement".

Order - Status 20: 21.8512.23 wp.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala and Associates .....Petitioner Vs. Nirmal Township A Co Operative .....Respondents Housing Society Ltd and Anr Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/b Deepashika Godbole for the petitioner Mr. Shrikant D. Patil for respondent Smt. M. S. Bane, AGP for the State CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 15th MARCH 2024 P.C. Learned counsel submits that parties have exchanged the offers for settlement and they need some more time for exploring the possibility of settlement. Stand over to 1st April 2023. To be listed under the caption "For Settlement". [GAURI GODSE, J.]

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala and Associates … Petitioner Vs. Nirmal Township A Co-operative … Respondents Housing Society Ltd. and Another Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/b. Mr. Deepshikha Godbole for the Petitioner. Mr. Shrikant D. Patil for Respondent No. 1. Ms. R. S. Pawar, AGP for the State. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 1 st APRIL 2024 P.C. Learned counsels for the respective parties submit that the parties are unable to settle the dispute amicably. They make a request to fix the petition for hearing on admission. Stand over to 29th April 2024. [GAURI GODSE, J.] rrpillai

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE: 29th APRIL 2024 P.C. :- Iresh On account of paucity of time, following matters on Daily Board stand adjourned as follows : Sr. Nos. Next Date 61 to 70 18th June 2024 71 to 80 19th June 2024 81 to 90 21st June 2024 91 to 100 24th June 2024 101 to 110 25th June 2024 111 to 116 26th June 2024 118 to 120 26th June 2024 121 to 126 28th June 2024 127 30th April 2024 128 to 130 28th June 131 to 133 1st July 2024 134 3rd May 2024 135 to 140 1st July 2024 141 to 148 2nd July 2024 If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief or interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (GAURI GODSE, J.) 1/1

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT Ms. Deepashikha Godbole for Petitioner Ms. R. S. Pawar, AGP for State CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH J DATE : 24th July, 2024 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Petitioner , stand over to 29/07/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates. ...Petitioner. Versus Nirmal Township A CHS Ltd and Another. ...Respondents. —————— Mr. Girish S. Godbole, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Kaustabh Thipsay and Ms. Deepashikha Godbole for the Petitioner. Mr. Shrikant D. Patil for the Respondent No.1. Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for the Respondent-State. —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : July 29, 2024. P. C. : 1. Leave to correct pagination. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 seeks time to file reply. Let the reply be filed on or before 7th August 2024. Rejoinder, if any, to be filed on or before 12th August 2024. List on 13th August 2024 . It is made clear that time permitting, the petition will be heard finally at the admission stage. [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

Order - Status 30: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH J DATE : 13th August, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 06/09/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Ajinkya Taskar i/b Mr. Shrikant Patil for Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH J DATE : 6th September, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 11/10/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : 11th October, 2024. P. C. : TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Digitally signed by TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2024.10.15 09:56:54 On account of paucity of time, following matters on Daily Board dated 11th October 2024, stand adjourned as follows: - Serial. Nos. Next Date Sr. 32 To 51 rd December, 2024 (except Sr. 45) 3 Sr. 52 To 71 th December, 2024 (except Sr. 61) 4 Sr. 72 To 100 th December, 2024 (except Sr. 97) 6 Sr. 101 To 120 17th December, 2024 Sr. 121 To 140 18th December, 2024 Sr. 141 To 160 (except Sr. 155) 20th December, 2024 Sr. 161 To 180 rd January, 2025 (except Sr. 170) 3 Sr. 181 To 205 th January, 2025 (except Sr. 183,187,200) 6 If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief or interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH J DATE : 6th December, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 25/04/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 37: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 5th March, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 15/04/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 39: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Girish Godbole, Sr. Adv. A/W Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/by Ms. Deepashikha Godbole for Petitioner. Mr. Shrikant Dinkar Patil for Respondent No. 1. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 15th April, 2025 P.C. : S. O. to 21/04/2025 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 41: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT Adv. Deepashikha Godbole for Petitioner. Mr. Kishor Patil i/by Mr. Shrikant Dinkar Patil for Respondent No. 1. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 21st April, 2025 P.C. : S. O. to 23/04/2025 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 44: AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8512 OF 2023 B.K. Jhala & Associates … Petitioner V/s. Nirmal Township "A" Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Anr. … Respondents Mr. Girish S. Godbole, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/by Ms. Deepshikha Godbole for the petitioner. Mr. Kishor Patil i/by Mr. Shrikant D. Patil for respondent No.1. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : APRIL 23, 2025 P.C.: Mr. Godbole, learned Senior Advocate, on instructions from Mr. Kamlesh Jhala, partner of the petitioner, states that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file civil suit. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is made that this Court has not adjudicated petitioner's grievance on merits, and it shall be open for the petitioner to raise all contentions before the Civil Court by way of civil suit. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 2: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 16416 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders None present. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDLI) Date : 21 NOVEMBER 2016 Three weeks time i.e. 13.12.2016 is granted to remove office objections. REGISTRAR (JUDLI) RJ I gpj / 21.11.2016

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION STAMP NO.16416 OF 2016 Mrs. Janaki Subhash Sawant Petitioner Versus District Superintendent Land Record and others Respondents Mr. P. G. Kathane for the Petitioner. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondents. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 30th NOVEMBER, 2016 P.C. 1 Heard Mr. P. G. Kathane, the Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. 2 Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 11.01.2017. In addition to service of notice through Court, the advocate for the Petitioner shall serve a private notice by Registered Post A.D. and/or by Courier service and/or by hand delivery on the Respondents and shall file affidavit of service before the returnable date. 3 The principal contention of the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is that the consolidation proceedings are sought to be reopened after a period of 45 years. The parties are put to notice that in view of the narrow controversy involved the Petition may be heard and disposed of (905)-WPST-16416-16.doc*.* finally at the admission stage. In the meantime, there would be adinterim relief in terms of prayer clause (c). [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 16416 OF 2016 Mrs. Janaki Subhash Sawant ....Petitioner V/S District Superintendent Land Record, Sangli And Ors ....Respondent Mr. Pramod Gokul Kathane, for Petitioner. Mr. Manoj Ganpat Sawardekar, for R.No. 4A to 4K. Mr. S.D.Rayrikar, AGP, for R.Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Bharat A. Punekar, R.No. 3. CORAM : R.M. SAVANT., J DATE : 22nd February, 2017 P.C. : S.O. to 8th March 2017 for admission. To be placed on supplementary board. Ad-interim relief granted earlier, to continue until then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 16416 OF 2016 Mrs. Janaki Subhash Sawant ....Petitioner V/S District Superintendent Land Record, Sangli And Ors ....Respondent Ms Anusha A Kale i/b Shri Pramod Gokul Kathane For Petitioner Shri Akshay Bobade i/b Shri Bharat A Punekar R.no. 3 Shri S D Rayrikar, AGP R.no. 1 And 2 CORAM : R.M. SAVANT., J DATE : 8th March, 2017 P.C. : Stand over to 10/03/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: wpst1641616(908) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION St. NO. 16416 OF 2016 Mrs. Janaki Subhash Sawant ..Petitioner Vs. District Superintendent Land Record Sangli & Ors ..Respondents Ms Arusha A Kale i/b Mr. P. G. Kathane for the Petitioner Mr. M. G. Sawardekar for the Respondent Nos.4A to 4E Mr. S. H. Kankal AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 Mr. Akshay Bobade for the Respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6 CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 10th MARCH, 2017 P.C. 1 The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to amend so as to annex a typed copy of the impugned order. Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out within one week. List the Petition for admission on 2132017, to be shown on the supplementary board. [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3333 OF 2017 Mrs Janaki Subhash Sawant ..Petitioner Vs. District Superintendent Land Record, Sangli & Ors ..Respondents Mr. P. G. Kathane for the Petitioner Mr. S. D. Rayrikar AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 Mr. M. G. Sawardekar for the Respondent Nos.4(a) to 4(f) Mr. Akshay Bobade a/w Mr/ B. A. Punekar for the Respondent Nos.3, 5(a) to 5(f), 6(a) to 6(e) CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 21st MARCH, 2017 P.C. 1 The Writ Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked against the order dated 212016 passed by the District Superintendent of Land Records, Sangli, by which order the application for condonation of delay filed by the Respondent No.3 came to be allowed. The said order has been challenged on the ground that the District Superintendent of Land Record has condoned the delay merely on the ground that the principles of natural justice require that such delay is required to be condoned. The District Superintendent of Land Record has not come to a conclusion that the Respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6 have shown sufficient cause for condonation of delay running into 45 years for discretion to be exercised in favour of the said Respondents. The application filed by the said Respondent No.3 was in respect of correcting the consolidation scheme which has been implemented in Village Bhose, Taluka Miraj, District Sangli, as long back as in the year 1965. The Petitioner and the Respondent No.3 are the sons of one Dashrath Bandgar who had two other sons namely Laxman Dashrath Bandgar and Bhauso Dashrath Bandgar. It seems that Laxman and Bhauso have expired and their heirs are the Respondent Nos.5(a) to 5(f) and Respondent Nos.6(a) to 6(e) to the above Petition. However, the statements of the sons of the said Dashrath Bandgar were recorded before the Assistant Consolidation Officer in the year 1965 and it is the case of the Petitioner that the consolidation scheme was propounded on the basis of the said statement which was recorded by the Assistant Consolidation Officer. 2 The Learned Counsel for the parties i.e. Mr. Kathane for the Petitioner and Mr. Bobade for the Respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6 sought to make submissions against and for condonation of delay. 3 In my view, it is not necessary to delve into the said aspect since the District Superintendent of Land Records, Sangli has without coming to a conclusion that sufficient cause for condonation of delay has been made out by the Respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6 has condoned the said huge delay of 45 years. In my view, the interest of justice would be served if the impugned order dated 212016 is quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded back to the District Superintendent of Land Records Sangli for a denovo consideration of the application for condondation of delay. The parties may file additional pleadings if so advised before the District Superintendent of Land Records Sangli. The parties to appear before the District Superintendent of Land Records Sangli on 542017. The District Superintendent of Land Records Sangli thereafter may decide the application for condonation of delay by 155 2017 on its own merits and in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the instant order. Needless to state that the contentions of the parties are kept open for being urged before the District Superintendent of Land Records Sangli. 4 The Petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent and is disposed of. [R.M.SAVANT, J]

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 579 OF 2004 The Principal, Mahatma Phule Mahavidyalaya & Anr. ... ...... Petitioners. Versus Mr.Purushottam Nathuram Desai & Ors. ... ... ... ..... Respondents. Mr. Aniruddha Pratinidhi for the Petitioners. None for the Respondents. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATED : 10TH MARCH, 2005. P.C.: Issue notice to the respondents to show cause as to why the petition be not admitted, returnable after four weeks. Notice to indicate that the petition may be disposed of at the admission stage itself. Sd/- (S. A. BOBDE, J.)