All Writ Petition (Civil)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5504 OF 2008 Umajirao Sanamadikar Medical Foundation, Jath ) . ......Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & ors)........ Respondant. Mr. A.Y. Sakhare Sr. adv. I/b P.J.Thorat for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.P.Thakur AGP for the State. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 25TH JULY 2008. P.C.: Issue notice to the respondents. Counsel appearing for the State accepts notice, waives service and further states that they will consider the present writ petition as a representation and after considering the same pass appropriate order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with the law. In view of the statement made nothing survives in the present writ petition. Writ Petition is disposed of. The State shalll abide by the statement and pass appropriate order within two weeks from today. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J.

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1621 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1622 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1623 OF 2011 Global Trade Finance Limited ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Yashpal Thakur i/by M/s. Paras Kuhad & Associates, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Pednekar, A.P.P. for State in Cri.W.P. No. 1621 of 2011. Mr. A.S. Shitole, A.P.P. for State in Cri.W.P. No. 1622 of 2011. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, A.P.P. for State in Cri.W.P. No. 1623 of 2011. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 P.C. Heard. Issue notice to respondents returnable on 17.11.2011. The learned A.P.P. waives service on behalf of State. To be heard finally at admission stage along with W.P. No. 1620 of 2011. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)

Order - Status 12: WP 1620-G OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1620 OF 2011. WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1622 OF 2011. WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1623 OF 2011. Global Trade Finance Limited .. Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra and anr .. Respondents. Mr. Yashpal Thakur i/by M/s Paras Kuhad & Associates, for the petitioners in all the petitions. . Mrs. U. V. Kejariwal, APP for the Respondent – State Ms. K. R. Davierwala i/by M/s Mulla & Mulla C.B.C. for Respondent No.2. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 22nd November, 2012 P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has instructions from his client to withdraw the petitions. Petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 1651 OF 2009 Javed Nihal Ahmad Nihal Ansari ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Through jail Mr. Rajesh More, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : DATE: OCTOBER 5, 2009 P.C. : The Jail Superintendent shall file his affidavit personally by next Monday. List on 12th October, 2009. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1651 OF 2009 Javed Nihal Ahmad Nihal Ansari .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Through Jail Shri Rajesh More, APP, for the State. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2009 P.C: It appears that the petitioner was punished when he was lodged in the Thane Jail. Now the petitioner is lodged in Nashik Road Central Prison. Let an affidavit be filed by the Superintendent of the Thane Jail disclosing the details of the work allotted to the petitioner which he allegedly refused to do. S.O. to 9-11-2009. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (A.R. JOSHI, J.)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE 1 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1651 OF 2009 Javed Nihal Ahmad Nihal Ansari .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & R.Y. GANOO, JJ. November 09, 2009. P.C. This petition was received through Jail and challenges the order dated 7/1/2008 passed by the Superintendent of Central Prison at Thane, thereby removing the name of the petitioner from the remission register for one year. The petitioner himself has admitted that he was called upon to join the work allotted to him in the Jail premises and he made representation to the effect that he should be given a suitable work in view of his qualifications. He claims that he has passed B.Com. and, therefore, the work allotted to him in the factory was not suitable to him. It is his case that though he was called upon to work in the factory section, he was not informed as to which section and what kind of work he was required to do. Show cause notice was issued to him on 8/11/2007 and he had submitted his reply. On 7/1/2008 the impugned order was passed and the same has been approved by the learned District and Sessions Judge. We have perused the affidavits filed by Smt. Swati Madhav Sathe, Superintendent of Nasik Central Prison, as at present and the affidavit filed by Shri Yogesh Desai, who is presently the Superintendent of Central Prison at Thane and as per the said affidavit the petitioner was allotted work in the factory section on 20/8/2007 and he ought to have reported there. Instead, he did not report to the factory section where there are number of trades i.e. carpentry, power looms, stitching, bakery etc. and this was refused by the petitioner. We do not see any procedural error in passing the impugned order and in any case we are informed that the petitioner is likely to be released towards the end of December, 2009. No case is made out to cause interference in the order passed by the Superintendent, Central Prison at Thane and hence the petition is rejected. This order be communicated to the petitioner in the concerned jail. (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.5912 of 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Ms.Mamta Sharma i/b Lalit Jain for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 10th August 2010. P.C. : Colleague of Mr.Jain, advocate for the petitioner states that Mr.Jain is not well and prays for an adjournment. S.O for two weeks. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 20: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 5912 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. L.V. Jain for the Petitioner. Mr. Amet Shete for Respondent No.1. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 28th JUNE, 2011 P.C.: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition unconditionally. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. ..... (D.G.KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 6006 OF 2021 Noman Gulam Haider Shaikh … Petitioner V/s. The State Of Maharashtra … Respondent None for Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Hulke APP, for Respondent-State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI AND MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. th DATE : 10 NOVEMBER, 2022. P.C. : Learned APP on instructions from Additional Senior Jailor, Mumbai Central Prison, Mumbai submitted that, by an Order dated 22nd March, 2022 passed by City Civil and Sessions Court Mumbai, Appellant has been acquitted from the case and has been released from jail on 23rd March, 2022. In view thereof, present Petition has become infructuous and is accordingly disposed off. [MILIND N. JADHAV, J.] [A.S. GADKARI, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4924 OF 2006 Shri Devidas Sakharam Godge. ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.R.V. More i/b. V.S. Deokar for Petitioner. Mr.Mandar Limaye for Respondent No.2. Mr.R.D. Rane, GP for Respondent No.1. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & V.M. KANADE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 17, 2006 P.C. :- . Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned GP for respondent no.1 and learned Counsel for respondent no.2. . Learned GP seeks short adjournment of two weeks to take instructions and file affidavit-in-reply. . Place the matter on board after two weeks. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4924 OF 2006 Shri Devidas Sakharam Godge. ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.V.S. Deokar for Petitioner. Mr.R.D. Rane, GP for Respondent No.1. Mr.Ashutosh Gole i/b. Mandar Limaye for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & V.M. KANADE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 31, 2006 P.C. :- Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for respondent no.1 and learned Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Learned Counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3 seeks a short adjournment to take instructions in the above and file an affidavit-in-reply. Matter stands adjourned by three weeks. Pending further orders, there shall be an ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (d). (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4924 OF 2006 Shri Devidas Sakharam Godge ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.V.S. Deokar for the Petitioner. Mr.R.D. Rane, Government Pleader, for Respondent No.1. Mr.Mandar Limaye for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : H.S. BEDI, C.J., & V.M. KANADE, J. DATED: 16TH OCTOBER, 2006. P.C. : . The learned Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3 contends that before the interim order had been obtained on 31 st August, 2006, the petitioner had already joined his place of posting. . We, accordingly, vacate the stay granted by Order dated 31 st August, 2006. Reply and Rejoinder to be filed before the next date. . S.O. to 20 th November, 2006. CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J.

Order - Status 18: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.4924 of 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.Vishwasrao S. Deokar for petitioner. Mr.R.D.Rane, GP for resp.no.1. Mr.Mandar Limaye for resp no.2. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. December 06, 2006. P.C. .Petition isdisposed as withdrawn. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 3620 OF 2016 Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. J. Shekhar i/b J. Shekhar & Co., for the Petitioner. Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP for the Respondent State. Mr. M. S. Topkar, for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. Mr. Rampal Kohli, for Respondent No. 5. CORAM : V. M. KANADE, M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 28, 2016 PC. Issue notice before admission returnable on 25.4.2016. Sd/- [V. M. KANADE, J.] Sd/- [M. S. KARNIK, J.] Vinayak Halemath [1VI. 3. KAKINIK, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation •••• Petitioner vs State of Maharashtra and others •••• Respondents Mr. Shekhar Jagtap a/w Akshay Kapadia i/b J. Shekhar & Co. for the petitioner. Mr. S. A. Sawant a/w Mr. Ketan Joshi for respondent no. 3 o. 3 Mr. R. S. Kohli for Respondent no. 5. Ms. Pavitra Manesh i/b Mr. M. S. Tapkar for respondent nos. 6 & 7 t nos .6&7 CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 29 MARCH , 2016 ORDER: Not on board. In view of the urgency expressed, matter is taken on board today. Pending the other writ petitions, this Court in Writ Petition No. 337 of 2016, have passed workable order wherein this Court has observed in para 5 as under: **"**5 However, considering the emergent situation in question and so also the obligations of the "Local Authority" to provide various services in the city of Nashik through or by appointing agents/contractors and to avoid further complications, as such sudden revocation of registration itself rendered the Petitioner helpless for want of power and authority to appoint the Licensed Contractor or agents for providing essential services, therefore, by way of interim arrangement, we are inclined to observe that the position as of 31 December 2015 requires to continue in all respect, qua the subject matter of impugned notice dated 1 January 2016 i.e. no revocation of registration, so that the people at large should not be made to suffer because of the stated inaction on the part of the Corporation of non compliances, so referred in impugned order dated 1 January 2016. The Petitioner to continue with their obligations to provide amenities and/or facilities and services to the citizen of Nashik City." A statement is made that this arrangement is still continuing. By impugned tender notice dated 29/02/2016, four contractors whose issue with regard to their black listing, are pending in the Court i.e. Writ Petition No. 379 of 2016, 380 of 2016, 11630 of 2015 & 11631 of 2015. The issue is also pending with the State Government in view of the appeal under section 451 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 filed by respondent no. 5. After going through the orders passed by this Court in the petition filed by those contractors, who are at present black listed and as their applications for stay and/or related issues are not yet finalized in their favour, the resolution and decision taken by respondent no. 3 i.e. Standing Committee of Municipal Corporation, permitting them to participate in the tender process, in our view, at this stage, required to be stayed. This is to avoid further complications and specifically in view of the fact of pendency of writ petitions so referred above. By keeping all points open, including maintainability of writ petitions as alternative remedy is available, and the other petitions are pending in this Court for final decision as recorded above, we are inclined to pass the order as under. O R D E R (i) Adinterim relief in terms of prayer clause (C) which reads thus: "C. Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Writ Petition, this Hon'ble High Court may kindly stay the effect, implementation, execution and operation of the impugned Resolution No. 822 dated 29/02/2016 passed by the Respondent no. 3 and thereby permitting the Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 to participate in the tender process due on 29/03/2016." Parties to act upon the authenticated copy of this order. The learned counsel for respondent no. 5, on instructions, seeks stay of this order passed in Court today. Considering the reasons so recorded above, the said request is rejected. Stand over to 12/04/2016. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation -Versus F Petitioner State of Maharashtra & Ors. R Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.882 OF 2016 D.882 OF 20 16 Sayyed Asif Ali A Applicant In the matter between: Nashik Municipal Corporation P Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. R Respondents Mr.Shekhar Jagtap with Akshay Kapadia i/b. J. Shekhar & Co. for petitioner Mr.Ketan Joshi for respondent No.3 Mr.S.R.Ranghe for respondent No.4 and for applicant in CAW 882 of 2016 Mr. Rampal S. Kohli for respondent No.5 CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A.SAYED, JJ § DATE : 13th April 2016. 2016. P.C. 1] In view of the earlier order dated 5th April 2016 after considering the civil application as well as the submissions so made, we have specifically ordered as under:- "5. On 29 March, except Respondent No. 4, all other Respondents were duly heard. Based upon the orders passed in Writ Petitions, which are mentioned in para 4 of the order dated 29 March 2016 and considering the urgency so expressed, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) of the Petition has been granted. As the matter itself is directed to be listed on 12 April, 2016, we are inclined to list this matter on 12 April 2016 so that all the Respondents will be heard on merits of the matter, including the submissions revolving around the order so passed on 29 March, 2016. In view of the above, no case is made out for interim relief and/or recalling any order at this stage in this Civil Application. The Petitioner to file Reply to the Civil Application. The submission is made that in other Writ Petitions (Writ Petition No. 379 of 2016, 380 of 2016, 11630 of 2015 & 11631 of 2015) directions are given to list the said Petitions after two weeks for final disposal and it is also observed that further process of the tender shall be subject to the final outcome of the Writ Petitions. Therefore, it is also necessary for the parties to file common precipe so that all these matters can be heard together by one Bench. Parties to take steps accordingly. Place the Petition on 12 April 2016 for hearing before the appropriate Bench." 2] We are informed that a precipe is already filed in pursuance of the above order on 11th April 2015 before the Hon'ble the Chief Justice for appropriate orders. 3] Let the matter be placed before appropriate bench in view of the above. (A.A.SAYED, J) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J)

Order - Status 12: mnm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Akshar Kapadia i/b. J. Shekhar & Co. Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Ketan Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Mr. Mohammed Ashraf, Advocate for Respondent No.5 Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for the State Ms. Pavitra M. i/b. Mr. M.S. Topkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 CORAM : V.M.KANADE & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 20TH APRIL, 2016 P.C. : Not before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member. Matter be placed before the appropriate Bench. Application is made for speaking to the minutes of our order dated 28th March, 2016. In fact the order was passed that the matter should not be placed before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member. However, inadvertently an order is passed " issue notice before admission returnable on 25.4.2016 ". The said order is accordingly modified and it is clarified that on 28th March, 2016 order which was passed was "The matter should not be placed before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member". The order is accordingly modified and shall be read as follows: "The matter should not be placed before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member" . (M.S. KARNIK, J.) (V.M.KANADE, J.)

Order - Status 14: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 15: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11630 OF 2015 M/s Samiksha Construction Company ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP STAMP NO. 23039 OF 2017 In Writ Petition 11630 OF 2015 M/s Samiksha Construction Company ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11631 OF 2015 M/s Vishal Services ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2016 M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 380 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor, Shri. Chetan Bora ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 293 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 474 OF 2016 M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 292 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 473 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor, Shri. Chetan P. Bora ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 1064 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 11631 OF 2015 M/s Vishal Services ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 473 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor Shri. Chetan Bora ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 334 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 379 OF 2016 ....RESPONDENT M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 336 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 380 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor, Shri. Chetan P. Bora ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 640 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 379 OF 2016 M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 474 OF 2010 Tain Constructions ....PETITIONER V/S Vilas Shankar Shelar And Ors. ....RESPONDENT ....APPLICANT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 19th March, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 07/08/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ....RESPONDENT Mr. Mithchelle Almeida i/b Rompal Singh Kohli for Respondent Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 & 2 CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 29th April, 2024 P.C. : Stand over to 08/07/2024 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )