All Interlocutory Application

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8486 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 241 OF 2007 Vyankatesh Barun Harijinas Reddy Since Deceased, through his legal representatives 1. Harijan Ananthamma w/o. Harijan Pedda Burranna and Ors. … Applicants IN THE MATTER OF : Union of India and Ors. … Appellants Versus Vyankatesh Barun Harijinas Reddy Since Deceased, through his legal representatives 1. Harijan Ananthamma w/o. Harijan Pedda ... Respondents Burranna and Ors. Mr. Sachin Punde, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Y. S. Bhate, Advocate for Appellants. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 6th MAY, 2024. P.C. : Learned counsel for the applicants on instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw this application. Considering his submission, application is allowed to be withdrawn. Dismissed and disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

Order - Status 4: Megha 7_ia_1763_2023.doc MEGHA S PARAB Digitally signed by MEGHA S PARAB Date: 2023.05.04 16:41:31 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1763 OF 2023 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1340 OF 2023 Ramesh Jamdade ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents ... Mr. Sadip Pareikh with Mr. Prabhakar Jadhav for the Applicant/Intervenor Mr. Ritesh Thobde with Mr. Sagar Tambe for the Applicant in ABA/1340/2023. Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM: SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 4th MAY, 2023. P. C. :- Not on board. Upon being mentioned, taken on board. This is an application for intervention fled by the First Informant. Considering the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Learned counsel for the Applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application to implead the Intervenor as party Respondent and furnish copy of the anticipatory bail application to the learned counsel for the Intervenor on or before the next date of hearing. The application stands disposed of. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.339 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.1323 OF 2024 Kadar Isak Khan @ Matanwala : Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. : Respondents Adv. Keshav Chanvan, for the Applicant. Mr. A. R. Patil, APP for the State. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J. DATE : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2024 P.C. : Issue notice to Respondents, returnable on 1st March, 2024. Learned APP waives notice for Respondent No.1. Notice to Respondent No.2 to be served through the Concerned Investigating Officer/Police Station. (KISHORE C. SANT, J.)

Order - Status 5: Diksha Rane 8. IA 339-24.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.339/2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL 161/2024 KADAR ISAK KHAN @ MATANWALA ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS ------------ Adv. Keshar Chavan for the applicant. Mr. S. A. Karmakar, APP for the State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : MARCH 1, 2024. P.C. : 1. I am informed that the appellant is in custody for more than 8 years. The notice has already been issued to the victim by this Court. The service report is awaited. The Investigating Officer to inform the victim the next date of hearing and that she has a right to be represented by an advocate or through legal aid. 2. Stand over to 6/3/2024 , high on board. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.339 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 161 of 2024 KADAR ISAK KHAN @ MATANWALA .. APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS Mr. Keshav Chavan, for the applicant. Mr. S. A. Karmakar, APP for the State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : MARCH 6, 2024 P.C. : At the request of learned APP who seeks time to take instructions whether next date of hearing is communicated to the complainant in terms of order dated 01/03/2024, stand over to 07/03/2024. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.339 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.161 OF 2024 KADAR ISAK KHAN @ MATANWALA ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS ------------ Adv. Keshav Chavan for the applicant. Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for the State. API Lamkhade, Shil Daighar Police Station. ------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : MARCH 7, 2024 P.C. : 1. Learned APP submits on instructions of the Investigating Officer that the victim though was not available at the residential address as she is presently in Uttar Pradesh, however telephonically the victim has intimated that she is in need of legal aid assistance. 2. Accordingly, Advocate Saakshat Relekar is requested to appear on behalf of the victim and assist this Court. 3. List the application on 11.03.2024 fairly high on board. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 11: Diksha Rane 19.ia.339-24.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.339 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.161 OF 2024 KADAR ISAK KHAN @ MATANWALA ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS ------------ Adv. Keshav Chavan for the applicant. Mr. S. A. Karmakar, APP for the State. Adv. Saakshat Relekar for the respondent no.2 (appointed advocate). CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : MARCH 11, 2024 P.C. : At the request of Mr. Saakshat Relekar, who has just been served with the copy of the appeal, stand over to 12/3/2024 . (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 14: Urmila Ingale 907-ia-339-24.doc 2024:BHC-AS:12137 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 339 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 161 OF 2024 KADAR ISAK KHAN @ MATANWALA APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. RESPONDENTS Mr. Keshav Chavan, for the applicant. Mr.Saakshat Relekar, for respondent no.2. Mr. S. A. Karmakar, APP for the State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : MARCH 12, 2024 P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State. This is an interim application for bail in respect of the offence punishable under sections 376(2)(i), 506, 363 of the Indian Penal Code (hereafter 'IPC' for short) and under section 5(m) & 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereafter referred to as "POCSO Act") registered vide C.R. No. 19 of 2016 with Daighar Police Station. The interim application is opposed by learned APP and learned counsel who has been appointed by this Court to represent the complainant. The applicant is convicted for the offence punishable under sections 5(m) & 6 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 14 years and fine of Rs.5,000/-. The applicant is convicted for other offences the sentence to which is to run concurrently. The applicant was arrested on 30/01/2016 and is now in custody for more than 8 years and 2 months. The applicant has undoubtedly been committed for a serious offence. The appeal has been admitted and will be heard finally in due course. The applicant has undergone custody for more than half of the sentence imposed by the trial Court up till now. Prior to the substitution of section 6 of POCSO Act with effect from 16/08/2019 substituted by Act 25 of 2019., the punishment for aggravated penetrative sexual assault was rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years but which may extend to imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine. 2/5 Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 invited my attention to the findings recorded by the trial Court. It is submitted that on the basis of the evidence on record, for cogent reasons, the trial Court has rightly convicted the applicant for such a serious offence. It is therefore submitted that the applicant is not entitled for bail and instead of enlarging the applicant on bail, the appeal itself be heard finally. My attention is invited to the decision of the Supreme Court of India in State of U.P. Vs. Sonu Kushwaha 1 to contend that the trial Court has rightly held the accused guilty of offence of aggravated penetrative sexual assault punishable under section 6 of POCSO Act. My attention is also invited to the decision of the Supreme Court in 2 Nawabuddin Vs. State of Uttarakhand to submit that no leniency can be shown to an accused who has committed the offences under the POCSO Act and particularly when the same is proved by adequate evidence before a Court of law. These decisions will undoubtedly guide this Court when the appeal is finally heard on merits. It is not possible for me to hear the appeal finally at this 1 Criminal Appeal No. 1633 of 2023 dated 05/07/2023 2 Criminal Appeal No. 144 of 2022 dated 08/02/2022 stage considering the pendency of the old matters. The appeal is unlikely to be heard finally any time soon in the near future. Considering that the applicant is 70 years of age and has already undergone 8 years and 2 months of his substantive sentence, in my opinion, the applicant can be enlarged on bail. The applicant is not reported to have any criminal antecedents. Considering that the victim is residing in the same vicinity, on instructions, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant will reside outside Mumbai/ Mumbai Suburban and Thane districts. The statement is accepted. Hence, the following order :- O R D E R (a) The interim application is allowed. (b) The applicant-Kadar Isak Khan @ Matanwala in connection with C.R. No.19 of 2016 registered with Daighar Police Station shall be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount. (c) The applicant is permitted to furnish cash bail surety in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- for a period of 6 weeks in lieu of surety. (d) The applicant shall report to the trial Court once in a year, on the first Monday of the concerned month between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. commencing from April 2024. (e) The applicant shall not enter Mumbai/ Mumbai Suburban and Thane districts after being released on bail except for reporting to the trial Court. (f) The applicant shall inform the trial Court as well as the investigating officer the contact details as well as residential address while residing outside Mumbai/Mumbai Suburban and Thane districts. (g) The applicant shall remain present at the time of hearing of this appeal. The interim application is disposed of. I appreciate the valuable assistance rendered by Mr.Saakshat Relekar, the learned Advocate, who appeared on behalf of respondent No.2 at my request in this proceeding. His engagement be regularized by the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8302 OF 2024 In Writ Petition STAMP NO. 95499 OF 2020 M/s Mantech Counting And Systems Llp ....PETITIONER V/S Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 25th July, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 04/09/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: 30-as-ia-8302-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.8302 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.95499 OF 2020 M/s. Mantech Counting and Systems LLP …Applicant / Petitioner Versus Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and ors …Respondents *** Mr. E.A. Sasi for the Applicant / Petitioner. Mr. K. S. Thorat, 'B' Panel Advocate for the Respondent No.4 - State *** CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 6 SEPTEMBER 2024 P.C.: . Registry to examine the subject matter and place the Application before the appropriate bench as per roster. ( M.M. SATHAYE, J.) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.8302 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO.95499 OF 2020 M/s. Mantech Counting & Systems LLP .. Applicant Versus Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. E.A. Sasi a/w. Mr. Arnav Rane, Mr. Tejas Shinde & Mr. Bijoy Chacko, Advocates for the Applicant. Mr. A.I. Patel, Addl.G.P. a/w. Mr. Karan Thorat, B Panel for Respondent No.4-State. CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 19, 2024 P. C. The above Interim Application is filed seeking condonation of delay and to restore the above Writ Petition to file, which was dismissed pursuant to the Order passed by the Registrar (Judicial-I) for non-removal of office objections. Since the above Interim Application is coming up for the first time, the Registry is directed to issue notice to Respondent Nos.1 to 3, returnable on 17th December, 2024. In addition to the Court notice, the Applicant is permitted to serve the papers and proceedings of the above Interim Application, along with the above Writ Petition, and a copy of this Order, on Respondent Nos.1 to 3 by private notice as well. Mr. Patel, learned AGP waives notice on behalf of Respondent No.4. Stand over to 17 th December, 2024. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order. [SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8302 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 95499 OF 2020 M/s. Mantech Counting & Systems LLP …Applicant/ Original Petitioner Versus Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation & Ors …Respondents Mr. E.A. Sasi, a/w Arnav Rane & Bijoy Chacko for the Applicant. Mr. A.I. Patel, Addl.GP, a/w K.S. Thorat B Panel, for Respondent No.4. None for Respondent No.1. CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 17, 2024 PC : The above Interim Application is filed seeking a Condonation of Delay of approximately one year and nine months in filing the above Application and to set aside the order passed by the Registrar (Judicial-I) dated 16th June, 2022 under which the above Writ Petition was dismissed for non-removal of office objections. Page 1 of 3 December 17, 2024 Ashwini Vallakati The learned AGP appears on behalf of the State of Maharashtra (Respondent No.4). As far as Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are concerned, we find that they have been duly served by private notice (as directed by our order dated 19th November, 2024) and an affidavit of service (dated 9th December, 2024) to that effect is also filed. Despite service, none have appeared on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 3. We have gone through the above Interim Application. Though we are not fully satisfied with the explanation given for the delay, in order to ensure that the Applicant/original Petitioner is not denied an opportunity of redressing their grievances on merits, we condone the delay and set aside the order passed by the Registrar (Judicial-I) dated 16th June, 2022 subject to the condition that the Applicant/original Petitioner pay cost of Rs.50,000/- to the Tata Memorial Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, within a period of two weeks from today and the receipt evidencing the payment of cost is submitted to the Registry of this Court which shall be kept in the file of the above matter. Once the costs are paid, the above Writ Petition shall be restored to the file and the office objections if any, shall also be removed by the Applicant/original Petitioner within a period of two weeks Page 2 of 3 December 17, 2024 Ashwini Vallakati thereafter. It is made clear that if the costs are not paid as stipulated in this order, the above Interim Application shall automatically stands dismissed without further reference to the Court. The Interim Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order. [ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] [ B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8302 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 95499 OF 2020 M/s Mantech Counting and Systems LLP Petitioner Versus Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation & Ors. Respondents Ms. Bhagyashri Mangale i/b E.A. Sasi for the Petitioner/Applicant. CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE: JANUARY 3, 2025 P. C. Not on Board. At the request of the Applicant/Petitioner, taken on Board. The time to pay the cost of Rs. 50,000 to the Tata Memorial Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai (pursuant to the Order dated 17th December 2024) is extended by a period of one week from today. Page 1 of 2 JANUARY 3, 2025 3. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order. [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1783 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2023 Harishchandra Rampal Saroj @ Airport … Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents ..... Ms. Veenu Dubey i/b Mr.Anil Dubey, for the Appellant/Applicant. Mr. A.R.Kapadnis, APP, for the Respondent-State. ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 26th JULY, 2023. P.C. It appears from the police report submitted by the Senior Police Inspector, Pant Nagar Police Station to the learned APP that the concerned police personnel had only enquired with the landlord of the victim's parents about the whereabouts of the victim. It seems that there are no efforts made by the concerned police station to trace out and locate the whereabouts of victim and her parents. REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2023.07.28 10:36:50 +0530 2 Learned APP seeks one more opportunity to trace and the location of the victim. 3 At his request, stand over to 9 th August, 2023. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 5: Uday S. Jagtap IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2023 WITH I.A. NOS. 1784 OF 2023 & 1783 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2023 Harischandra Rampal Saroj @ Airport .. Appellant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents ..... Ms. Veenu Dubey i/b Mr. Anil Dubey for the appellant Mr. Jai V. Kanade for the respondent no.2 – appointed Advocate Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, APP for the respondent – State ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 30th AUGUST, 2023 P.C. . At the request of learned Counsel for respondent no.2, list on 13th September, 2023. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.)

Order - Status 6: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1783 OF 2023 a/w INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.562 OF 2023 ….. Harishchandra Rampal Saroj @ Airport ] Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another ] Respondents Ms. Veena Dubey i/b Mr. Anil Dubey, for Applicant. Ms. G.P. Mulekar, A.P.P, for Respondent No.1-State. Ms. Jai V. Kanade, Appointed Advocate, for Respondent No.2. ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 13th September, 2023. P.C. Heard. Reserved for orders. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 8: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.562 OF 2023 Harishchandra Rampal Saroj @ Airport ] Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another ] Respondents ….. Ms. Veenu Dubey i/b Mr. Anil Dubey, for Applicant. Ms. G.P. Mulekar, A.P.P, for Respondent No.1-State. Ms. Jai V. Kanade, Appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2. ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. RESERVED ON : 13.09.2023 PRONOUNCED ON : 15.09.2023 ORDER: . In view of disposal of Interim Application No.1783 of 2023, this application stands disposed of. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 5: SALUNKE J V Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.01.13 17:42:56 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 4 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17167 OF 2022 Sunil Tukaram Jagtap } Petitioner Versus Sanjay Krishnarao Taksande } and Ors. } Respondents Ms. Radhali Kadam with Mr. S. S. Kulkarni for the petitioner. Mr. A. R. Gole for respondent no. 1. Mr. Hrishikesh Chavan for respondent no. 2. Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader with Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for State. Mr. Anil Sakhare, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kiran Gandhi i/b. Little and Co. for respondent no. 4. Mr. Aditya A. Joshi i/b. Mr. Abhijeet A. Joshi for respondents 5 and 6 (MSETCL). CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE: JANUARY 13, 2023 P.C.: 1. The learned advocate for respondent no. 2 seeks time to file affidavit in reply to the interim application. The reply shall be filed within one week from today. 2. Place the matter on 1st February 2023. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 1

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.4 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.17167 OF 2022 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.4 OF 2020 Sunil Tukaram Jagtap ....Petitioner/Applicant V/S Sanjay Krishnarao Taksande & Ors. ....Respondents … Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni for the Petitioner/Applicant. Mr. G.S. Godbole a/w Mr. A.R. Gole for Respondent No.1. Mr. Hrishikesh Chavan for Respondent No.2-MSEB. Mr. Anil Sakhare, Senior Advocate and Mr. Kiran Gavellkar i/b M/s. Little & Co. for Respondent No.4-MSEDCL. Mr. P.P. Kakade, GP a/w Mr. M.M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 and 7-State. … Mr. Abhijit Joshi for Respondent Nos.5 and 6-MSETCL. CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 1st FEBRUARY 2023. P.C.: 1 We have heard the learned Advocate for the Petitioner/Applicant and the learned Advocates for the respective Respondents. 2 The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has filed Interim Application for amendment in view of the subsequent development. He submits that the Petitioner had challenged the appointment of Respondent No.1 initially with Respondent No.5. The tenure of Respondent No.1 with Respondent No.5 is over. Fresh selection process was conducted by Respondent No.4 in which Respondent No.1 is selected as Director (Operations). The same is also against the rules. The rules require that a person with impeccable past history can be considered. The Respondent No.1 does not fit into it. 3 The learned Advocate for the Respondent submits that the fresh appointment is by another employer, the cause of action of the Writ Petition now does not subsist. In view of that in a Writ Petition, for which the cause of action does subsist, amendment may not be allowed. 4 It is not disputed by the learned Advocate for the Petitioner that when the PIL was filed Petitioner was seeking writ of quo warranto qua appointment of Respondent No.1 by Respondent No.5. The tenure of Respondent No.1 with Respondent No.5 is over. Respondent No.4 conducted fresh selection process and has selected Respondent No.1 as Director (Operations). The same would be a completely fresh cause of action as the employer and the designation has changed. 5 In light of above, as the relief in the original Writ Petition itself has become infructuous, it would be improper to consider the present 2/3 Application for amendment. It is for the Petitioner to take appropriate steps by filing proceedings as may be maintainable. 6 In light of above, the PIL and Interim Application stands disposed of. The Petitioner may take proceedings as may be permissible under law. In that event all contentions of the Petitioner as well as respective Respondents are kept open. No costs. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2023.02.04 10:27:34 +0530

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1/2 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1485 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13227 OF 2018 Mr. Abhijit Gorak Kanse & Ors. ...Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Mr.Santosh Bapurao Rathod & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Zishan Quazi for the Applicants. Adv. Mangal Bhandari a/w. Mr.Mangesh Madhav Deshmukh for the Petitioners. …… Mr. S.P. Thorat, AGP for the Respondent -State. Dr.Gunratan Sadavarte for Respondent No. 150. CORAM : A. A. SAYED & V.G.BISHT, JJ …... DATED : 13th JULY, 2021 (Through VC) P.C.: INTERIM APPLICATION The Interim Application is taken out for transposition of Petitioner Nos. 9, 11, 26, 28 and 29 as party Respondents. By consent, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within a week. Amended copy of the Petition be served upon the Respondents. The Interim Application to stand disposed of. WRIT PETITION Learned AGP seeks time to file Affidavit in Reply. Affidavit in Reply to be filed within one week from today and copy thereof shall be served upon the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and learned Counsel for the other Respondents. List this Petition on 27th July, 2021. (V.G.BISHT, J.) (A. A. SAYED, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 1/2 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1485 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13227 OF 2018 …. ... Mr. Abhijit Gorak Kanse & Ors. ...Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Mr.Santosh Bapurao Rathod & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Anil Sakhare a/w Mr.Zishan Quazi for the Applicants. Adv. Mangal Bhandari a/w. Mr.Mangesh Madhav Deshmukh for the Petitioners. Mr. S.P. Thorat, AGP for the Respondent -State. Mrs.Vaishali Jagdale for Respondents Nos.41,42,43. ... CORAM : A.A. SAYED & V. G. BISHT, JJ. DATED : 27 JULY 2021 (THROUGH V.C.) P.C.: Leaned AGP states that the draft copy of the Affidavit-in-Reply has been sent to the concerned Officer and the same shall be filed by Friday i.e. 30 July 2021 with a copy to the other side. Rejoinder,if any, before the next date. Stand over to 5 August 2021. In the meantime, the Respondent No.5-MPSC is directed to furnish email-ids of Respondent No.6 to Respondent No.159 to the Advocate for the Petitioner, on the Advocate for the Petitioner communicating this order to Respondent No.5-MPSC as also the names of the said Respondents. 2/2 (V. G. BISHT,J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.)

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 223 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2087 OF 2021 … Appellant … Respondent Smt.Pramila S. Thakur, Appellant present in person. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 31st August, 2021. P.C. : Issue notice to the Respondent, returnable on 27th September, 2021. Appellant is directed to supply spare copy of compilation of present Appeal in the Registry of this Court on or before 7th September, 2021. Stand over to 27th September, 2021. Till the next date, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) of Interim Application No.2087 of 2021. [A.S. GADKARI, J.]

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 223 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2087 OF 2021 Pramila Sumansingh Thakur, Thr. Constituted Attorney Subhash V. Rajurkar … Appellant V/s. New India Co-Operative Bank Ltd, Through Chairman New India Bhavan … Respondent Mrs. Pramila S. Thakur, Appellant in person. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 26th October, 2021. P.C. : Note put up by the Registry mentions that, the sole Respondent has been served in the matter. Despite service, none appears for the Respondent. In order to grant an opportunity to the Respondent, stand over to 23rd November, 2021. Ad-interim relief, granted earlier, to continue till the next date. [A.S. GADKARI, J.]

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 3161 OF 2022 Safia Akhtar Shaikh ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 3248 OF 2022 Mustafa Ismail Dandekar ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 223 OF 2023 In Cr. Anticipatory Bail Appln. 3161 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil Through Authorized Representative I T Mangar ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT A/W IA/222/2023 IN ABA/3248/2022. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 24th February, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 28/03/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 3161 OF 2022 Safia Akhtar Shaikh ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 3248 OF 2022 Mustafa Ismail Dandekar ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 222 OF 2023 In Cr. Anticipatory Bail Appln. 3248 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil Through Authorized Representative I T Manager ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 223 OF 2023 In Cr. Anticipatory Bail Appln. 3161 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil Through Authorized Representative I T Mangar ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIRAM MADHUSUDAN MODAK J DATE : 13th April, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 27/04/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 3161 OF 2022 Safia Akhtar Shaikh ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 3248 OF 2022 Mustafa Ismail Dandekar ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 222 OF 2023 In Cr. Anticipatory Bail Appln. 3248 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil Through Authorized Representative I T Manager ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 223 OF 2023 In Cr. Anticipatory Bail Appln. 3161 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil Through Authorized Representative I T Mangar ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Nilesh Navale for Applicant in ABA/3161/2022 Mr. Chirag Chanani for applicant in ABA/3248/2022 Mr. Chintan Y. Shah for Applicant in IA/223/2023, IA/222/2023 Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for the State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIRAM MADHUSUDAN MODAK J DATE : 12th June, 2023 P.C. : At the request of the learned Counsel for the Appellant(s)/ Applicant(s) / Petitioner(s) / Respondent No. stand over to 03/07/2023. Ad-interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 3161 OF 2022 Safia Akhtar Shaikh ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 222 OF 2023 In Cr. Anticipatory Bail Appln. 3248 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil Through Authorized Representative I T Manager ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 3248 OF 2022 Mustafa Ismail Dandekar ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 223 OF 2023 In Cr. Anticipatory Bail Appln. 3161 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil Through Authorized Representative I T Mangar ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT Nilesh Navale for Petitioner for Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIRAM MADHUSUDAN MODAK J DATE : 3rd July, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 03/08/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3161 OF 2022 Safia Akhtar Shaikh ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 223 OF 2023 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3161 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil through Authorized Representative I T Mangar Applicant / Intervenor In the matter between Safia Akhtar Shaikh Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3248 OF 2022 Mustafa Ismail Dandekar ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 222 OF 2023 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3248 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil through Authorized Representative I T Mangar ..Applicant / Intervenor In the matter between Mustafa Ismail Dandekar ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Ms. Ilsa Shaikh i/b. Nilesh Navale, for the Applicant in ABA/3161/2022. Mr. Shyam Dewani a/w. Sachet Makhija i/b. Chirag Chanani, for the Applicant in ABA/3248/2022 (through VC). Mr. Chintan Shah, for the Intervenor in both ABAs. Mr. Avinash A. Naik, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 21 JUNE 2024 P.C. . By consent, stand over to 15 July 2024. Interim protection granted earlier, if any, shall continue to operate till the next date. R. N. LADDHA, J.

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3248 OF 2022 Mustafa Ismail Dandekar ... Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.222 OF 2023 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3248 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil ... Applicant In the matter between Mustafa Ismail Dandekar ... Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3161 OF 2022 Safia Akhtar Shaikh ... Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.223 OF 2023 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3161 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil ... Applicant In the matter between Safia Akhtar Shaikh ... Applicant Page 1 of 2 _______________________________________________ 15 July 2024 Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES Date: 2024.07.15 14:45:00 +0530 SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES WITH v/s. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr Nilesh Navale, a/w. Mr Somnath Kale, for the Applicant in ABA/3161/2022. …. Mr Shyam Dewani, a/w. Mr Sachet Makhija, i/b. Chirag Chanani, for the Applicant in ABA/3248/2022 (through VC). …. Mr Chintan Shah, for the Intervenor in both ABAs. Mr Yogesh Y Dabake, APP, for Respondent State. Coram : R.N. Laddha, J. Date : 15 July 2024 P.C. : . The learned Counsel for the applicants and the learned APP jointly seek an adjournment. At their request, stand over to 5 August 2024. Ad-interim relief granted earlier shall continue to operate till the next date. (R.N. Laddha, J.) Page 2 of 2 _______________________________________________ 15 July 2024

Order - Status 20: Chitra Sonawane 16-ABA-3161-2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Anticipatory Bail Application No.3161 of 2022 With Interim Application No.223 of 2023 in Anticipatory Bail Application No.3161 of 2022 Safia Akhtar Shaikh ... Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent. With Anticipatory Bail Application No.3248 of 2022 With Interim Application No.222 of 2023 in Anticipatory Bail Application No.3248 of 2022 Mustafa Ismail Dandekar ••• Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ••• Respondent. Mr Nilesh Navale for the applicant in ABA 3161 of 2022. Mr Shyam Dewani i/by Chirag Chanani for applicant in ABA No.324/2022. Mr Sandesh Patil i/by Chintan Patil for the intervenor in ABA No.3161 of 2022. Mr Sandesh Patil i/by Divya Pawar for intervenor in ABA No.3248/2022. Mr Yogesh Dabake, APP (through VC) for the State. Page No. 1 of 2 5 August 2024. Chitra Sonawane 16-ABA-3161-2022.doc Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 5 August 2024. P.C. : At the request of learned APP, stand over to 6 August 2024. Interim relief granted earlier, shall continue to operate till the next date. [ R. N. Laddha,J. ] Page No. 2 of 2 5 August 2024.

Order - Status 24: sg 931.aba3161-22.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3161 OF 2022 Safia Akhtar Shaikh ... Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.223 OF 2023 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3161 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil ... Applicant In the matter between Safia Akhtar Shaikh ... Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3248 OF 2022 Mustafa Ismail Dandekar ... Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.222 OF 2023 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3248 OF 2022 Akshay Chandrakant Patil ... Applicant In the matter between Mustafa Ismail Dandekar ... Applicant Page 1 of 3 7 August 2024 v/s. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent …. Mr Nilesh Navale, for the Applicant in ABA/3161/2022. Mr Shyam Dewani, i/b. Chirag Chanani, for the Applicant in ABA/3248/2022 (through VC). Mr Sandesh Patil, i/b. Mr Chintan Shah, for the Intervenor in ABA/3161/2022. Mr Sandesh Patil, i/b. Ms Divya Pawar, for the Intervenor in ABA/3248/2022. Mr Yogesh Y Dabake, APP, for Respondent State (through VC). …. Coram : R.N. Laddha, J. Date : 7 August 2024 P.C. : Interim Application No.223 of 2023 in Anticipatory Bail Application No.3161 of 2022 And Interim Application No.222 of 2023 in Anticipatory Bail Application No.3248 of 2022 . Heard. For the reasons stated in the applications and no objection from other side, the interim applications are allowed. Interim applications stand disposed of accordingly. Page 2 of 3 7 August 2024 . By consent, stand over to 2 September 2024. Interim relief granted earlier shall continue to operate till the next date. (R.N. Laddha, J.) Page 3 of 3 7 August 2024