All First Appeal
1) Document Filed: Report
Filed By : The Sangli Bank Ltd. Through Law Officer Mr. Avina
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 30/03/2007
Respondent-1: Annasaheb Shantappa Mule
Respondent-2: Ors.
Petitioner-1: The Sangli Bank Ltd.
Respondent-1: Santu Bhau Khatale
Petitioner-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Order - Status 8: CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1141 OF 2016 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1142 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. .. Applicant Vs. 1. Shri Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Devendranath S. Joshi, Advocate for applicant. CORAM : N.J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 13TH MARCH 2019 P.C. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1141 OF 2016 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 4th June 2019. Hamdast granted. Private service is permitted. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1142 OF 2016 1 The learned counsel for the applicantinsurer makes a statement that that the applicantinsurer will deposit the entire amount of compensation along with interest and costs as awarded by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Mumbai by the impugned order dated 6th February 2015 in Application (ECA) No. 4/C3/2009. 2 The statement made by the learned counsel for the applicantinsurer is accepted. The applicantinsurer shall deposit the entire amount of compensation along with interest till date and costs as awarded by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Mumbai within a period of four weeks from today, before the learned Commissioner. 3 In the meanwhile, there shall be adinterim stay to the execution and operation of the impugned order. It is, however, made clear that in the event, the applicantinsurer fails to deposit the aforesaid amount as directed above, the adinterim stay shall stand vacated automatically. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i ....APPELLANT V/S Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole And Anr....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7046 OF 2024 In First Appeal STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole ....PETITIONER V/S The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Region Office-no.2 ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1142 OF 2016 In First Appeal STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole And Anr....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1141 OF 2016 In First Appeal STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole And Anr....RESPONDENT None for the appellant VISHWAMBHAR MAHADEV PARKAR for Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT J DATE : 27th March, 2024 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Respondent , stand over to 24/04/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i ....APPELLANT V/S Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole And Anr....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1142 OF 2016 In First Appeal STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole And Anr....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 1141 OF 2016 In First Appeal STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole And Anr....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7046 OF 2024 In First Appeal STAMP NO. 16356 OF 2015 Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole ....PETITIONER V/S The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Region Office-no.2 ....RESPONDENT Adv. V. M. Parkar for Appellant. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT J DATE : 2nd May, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 09/05/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Respondent-1: Shri. Sandeep Ramchandra Chandole
Respondent-2: Anr.
Petitioner-1: The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Mumbai Regional Office-i
1) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Advocate: M/S. Purnanand & Co.
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 25/06/2001
Respondent-1: Shri Amarchand R. Baheti
Petitioner-1: Shri Gopal Gajanan Walawalkar& Ors.
Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.
1) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Advocate: Avinash Mukund Gokhale
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 15/11/2017
Respondent-1: Shri. Pandhari Shankar Lokare
Respondent-2: Ors.
Petitioner-1: Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Order - Status 8: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3224 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.699 OF 1999 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3225 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.700 OF 1999 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3226 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.701 OF 1999 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3227 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.702 OF 1999 Office Notes, office : Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, : appearances, Court's : orders or directions : and Registrar's orders : Mr.Anil Ahuja, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.V.N.Gangal, for the Respondent. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. P.C. :- . Mr.Gangal, the learned counsel for Respondent 2 states that the paper book will be prepared within four weeks. We record this statement. . Let the matters come up on board after four weeks. . Office to supply necessary xerox copies of the record to the learned counsel for Respondent 2. [SMT.RANJANA DESAI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
1) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Advocate: Govt.Pleader For R.No.1
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 06/07/2005
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Respondent-2: Anr.
Petitioner-1: Pundalik Chimaji Vidhate D/h Chandrabhagabai P.vidhate
Petitioner-2: Ors.
Respondent-1: Prakash Bharamu Jakhmale
Petitioner-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1380 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3891 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1380 OF 2016 IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance .. Appellant Vs. Ganesh Rangrao Akurde & Ors. .. Respondents Ms.Varsha Chavan, Advocate for appellant. None for respondents. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. DATE : 21ST NOVEMBER 2018 P.C. FIRST APPEAL NO. 1380 OF 2016 1 Not on board. Taken upon production. 2 Heard. 3 Admit. 4 Call for record and proceedings. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3891 OF 2016 5 Issue notice of the application, returnable on 30th January 2019. 6 On the applicant depositing the entire amount of compensation as awarded by the Claims Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today before the Claims Tribunal, Kolhapur, execution proceedings shall remain stayed until further orders. (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)
Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3891 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1380 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's orders Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Ms.Varsha Chavan for the applicant Mr.Vikrant A. Desai for the respondent no.1 CORAM : K. K. TATED, J DATE : APRIL 1,2019 P.C.: . At the request of advocate for the applicant, stand over to 10.04.2019 to enable the Applicant to take instruction whether they complied the order dated 21.11.2018 i.e. to deposit entire awarded amount in the Tribunal. (K.K.TATED, J.)
Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3891 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1380 OF 2016 Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Applicant V/s. Ganesh Rangrao Akurde & anr. Respondents Mr. D.S. Joshi I/b. Ms. Varsha Chavan for the applicant. Mr. Vikrant A. Desai for respondent no.1. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 25th JUNE, 2019. P.C.: . Mr. D.S. Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant states that the entire compensation as per the judgment and award has been deposited before the Claims Tribunal on 14/12/2018. In the light of said statement, interim relief is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Civil Application stands disposed of. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
Respondent-1: Ganesh Rangrao Akurde
Respondent-2: Anr.
Petitioner-1: Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited
Order - Status 9: Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3096 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.20874 OF 2004 Vimal Chandrakant Shah & Ors. ...Applicants V/s. Surendra Dhanji Shah & Ors. ...Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3098 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.20878 OF 2004 Vimal Chandrakant Shah & Ors. Applicants V/s. Hansa Jayendra Shah & Ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3100 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.21020 OF 2004 Vimal Chandrakant Shah & Ors. Applicants V/s. Bindu Kiran Sampat & Ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3102 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.20891 OF 2004 Vimal Chandrakant Shah & Ors. ...Applicants V/s. Pramila Dhirajlal Parekh & Ors. ...Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3104 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.20881 OF 2004 Vimal Chandrakant Shah & Ors. Applicants V/s. Surendra Dhanji Shah & Ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3108 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.21002 OF 2004 Vimal Chandrakant Shah & Ors. Applicants V/s. Tersih Keshavji Raigoga & Ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3115 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.21007 OF 2004 Vimal Chandrakant Shah & Ors. ...Applicants V/s. Bindu Kiran Sampat & Ors. ...Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3117 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.21013 OF 2004 Vimal Chandrakant Shah & Ors. Applicants V/s. Kumud Tersih Raigoga & Ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3119 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.21016 OF 2004 Vimal Chandrakant Shah & Ors. Applicants V/s. Sangeet Vinay Raigoga & Ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3121 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.20869 OF 2004 Vimal Chandrakant Shah & Ors. ...Applicants V/s. Jayendra Dhanji Shah & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Vimal Chandrakant Shah, Applicant, present in person. Mr.Ramesh Jain, Advocate, for the Respondents. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE : 21ST JANUARY, 2008. P.C.: In view of averments made in the application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Accordingly, delay is condoned. Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a). [ABHAY S. OKA, J.]
Respondent-1: Sangeet Vinay Raigoga& Ors.
Petitioner-1: Vimal Chandrakant Shah& Ors.
Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1008 OF 2019 Shri. Narayan Punja @ Punjaji Nagare ....Appellant V/S The Divisional Manager, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., ....Respondent Sachin Gite For Appellant CORAM : K.K. TATED, J DATE : 30th July, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the Appellant, Stand over to 6/8/2019 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 9: 45.1008.19-fa.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION First Appeal No.1008/2019 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. Sachin Gite for the Appellant CORAM: K.K.TATED, J. DATED : AUGUST 6, 2019 P.C. 1 Heard. By this appeal, the Appellant claimant challenges the judgment and award dated 12.02.2019 passed by the MACT, Niphad in MACP No.45/2015 dismissing their claim petition under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. 2 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Appellant and the reasons recorded by the Tribunal in para 13 of the impugned judgment and award, following order is passed: a. Admit. b. The Appellant is directed to file private paper book within one year from today with copy to other side, failing which the First Appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the court. c. Printing dispensed with. d. Call R & P. e. Hearing expedited. f. Liberty granted to the Appellant to move for early hearing once the paper book is filed and R & P is received. (K.K.TATED, J.)
Respondent-1: The Divisional Manager
Respondent-2: Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd.
Petitioner-1: Shri. Narayan Punja @ Punjaji Nagare