All First Appeal

Order - Status 7: ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4296 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.1089 OF 2015 The National Insurance Co.Ltd. ...Applicant vs. Smt.Anuja Ramachal Patel & Ors. ...Respondents Ms Poonam Mittal for the Applicant CORAM :K.K.TATED,J. DATE : AUGUST 27, 2019 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. By this application the applicant is seeking stay of operation and implementation Judgment and Award dated 2nd August 2014 passed by MACT,Mumbai in Claim Petition No.2370 of 2007 holding that the claimants are entitled to compensation of Rs.11,86,671/ with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a. 2 The learned counsel for the applicant submits that they have challenged the impugned Judgment on quantum basis. She submits that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is on higher side. She further submits that if the entire amount is recovered by the respondents by filing execution application, then nothing survives in the present application. She submits that the applicant is ready and willing to deposit the entire amount with interest within three weeks from today. Statement is accepted. She submits that pending the final disposal of the present First Appeal, this Court be pleased to stay the operation and implementation of the impugned Judgment. 3 It is to be noted that in the present proceedings accident occurred on 3rd July 2007. Claimant No.1 lost her husband and the claimant Nos.2 and 3 lost their father. At the time of accident the age of the deceased was 45 years. He was running the medical shop under the name and style of Ashish Medical and General Stores,Kandivali, Mumbai. He was earning nearby 1,10,943/ p.a from his business. Considering this aspect, the claimant No.1wife and claimant Nos.3 and 4 being minors, I am of the opinion that they can be permitted to withdraw the amount. 4 Hence I pass the following order : (a) The operation and implementation of the impugned Judgment and Award dated 2nd August 2014 passed by MACT,Mumbai in Claim Petition No.2370 of 2007 is stayed during the pendency of the First Appeal with condition that the Applicant to deposit entire compensation amount with interest in MACT, Mumbai on or before 21st September 2019 failing which Civil Application shall stand dismissed. (b) If the entire amount of compensation with interest is deposited within stipulated time, Applicant No.1Smt.Anuja Ramachal Patel and claimant No.2Master Gaurav Ramachal Patel are entitled to withdraw a sum of Rs.2 lakh each with accrued interest thereon without furnishing any security subject to final outcome of the First Appeal. (c)The Tribunal is directed to invest remaining amount in Fixed deposit in any nationalised bank initially for a period of one year and to continue till further order. (d)Liberty is granted to the respondents claimants, if they so desire, to apply for withdrawal of the amount, which shall be decided on its own merits. (e)Civil Application is disposed of with no order as to costs. (K.K.TATED,J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 448 OF 2016 Shri Dastageer Karim Chougule ....Appellant V/S Shri Rajaram Dinkar Khot And Anr ....Respondent None present. CORAM : VIRENDRASINGH GYANSINGH BISHT, J DATE : 30th January, 2020 P.C. : Stand over to 27/02/2020 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 448 OF 2016 Shri Dastageer Karim Chougule ....APPELLANT V/S Shri Rajaram Dinkar Khot And Anr ....RESPONDENT None for parties CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH J DATE : 27th September, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 25/10/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.448 OF 2016. —————— —————— Dastageer Karim Chougule ...Appellant. Versus Rajaram Dinkar Khot and Anr. ...Respondents. None for the Appellant. Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : 25th October, 2024. P. C. : 1. None appears for the appellant. Even on the last ocassion, none had appeared for the appellant. 2. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. In view of disposal of appeal, Interim/Civil Applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and stand disposed of. [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2661 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1360 OF 2009 Pratap Shivram Mandhare & Anr. .. Applicants V/s. Gulab Maruti Mandhare & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. P.J. Pawar for the Applicants. Mr. P.G. Karande for Respondent No.1. Mr. S.V. Sonawane, AGP, for Respondent No.2. ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2657 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1361 OF 2009 Pratap Shivram Mandhare & Anr. .. Applicants V/s. Maharashtra Housing & Area Develop. Board & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. P.J. Pawar for the Applicants. Mr. S.V. Sonawane, AGP, for Respondent No.1. Mr. P.G. Karande for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C.: There shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (b) of the Civil Applications. However, if the prosecution launched against the applicants-appellants results in their conviction, the MHADA and/or the other respondents may move this Court for dismissal of the First Appeals. The Civil Applications are disposed of. .......

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 14893 OF 2018 Mr. Subhash Baburao Darekar Appellant Vs. Mr. V. R. Pawar, Chairman Tilak Nagar Sahayog CHS Ltd. & Ors. Respondents Mr. Sagar Batavia for the Appellant. Mr. Mohanish Chaudhari for the Respondents. CORAM : V. L. ACHLIYA, J. (VACATION COURT) DATE : 15th MAY, 2018. P. C. : Learned counsel for the Appellant seeks permission to withdraw the Appeal from Order with liberty to approach the appropriate authority to challenge the action on the part of the respondents. Allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Appeal from Order stands disposed of. [V. L. ACHLIYA, J.]

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVILAPPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 867 OF 2010 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2393 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 867 OF 2010 Rajendra Vitthal Bahirat. Appellant. Versus Prakash Ramchandra Girme. Respondent. Mr. A. B. Tajane for the Appellant. Mr. Mandar Limaye for the Respondent. CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR and A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 14TH JULY, 2010. P. C. : By consent, S. O. to 22nd July, 2010. Sd/ Sd/ (A. A. SAYED, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 867 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2393 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.867 OF 2010 Rajendra Vitthal Bahirat & ors. ....Appellants. Vs. Prakash Ramchandra Girme. ....Respondent. Mr.A.B.Tajane for appellants. Mr. Mandar Limaye for respondent. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED:- JULY 22, 2010 P.C. Not before the Bench of which one of us(A.M.Khanwilkar,J) is a member. (A.A.SAYED, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)

Order - Status 11: Shri Rajendra Vitthal Bahirat & Ors. ..Appellants Vs. Shri Prakash Ramchandra Girme ..Respondent Shri P.B.Jagtap i/b Shri Ashok Tajane for the Appellants Shri Mandar Limaye for the Respondent Coram: P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.M.SAVANT, JJ Date: 16th August 2010 P.C. mmj The Learned Counsel for the Appellants fairly states that this Appeal is not maintainable as the order is passed by the Trial Court under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. The Learned Counsel for the Appellants further states that he would like to file Revision Application. The permission is granted to take out appropriate proceedings as deem fit in accordance with law. The Certified copy and other papers annexed with the said First Appeal to be returned back to the Learned Counsel for the Appellants by giving simple copy of the same. Refund of Court fees as per rules. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (P.B.MAJMUDAR,J.)

Order - Status 8: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 931 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Ù¡, Court's or Judge's orders Ms Ka Fozda Ms Mr Assoc Ms Karishma Shirke i/by M/s Gordhandas & Fozdar for the Appellant. Ms Mrunalini V. Panchal i/by M/s Navdeep Vora & Associates for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.A. SAYED, J. DATE : JANUARY 6, 2014. P.C.: On the request of learned Counsel for the Appel Appellant, stand over 13 January 2014. 2. To be listed along with Appeal No. 930 of 2013. (A.A. SAYED, J.)