All Criminal Appeal

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Application No.919 of 2007 In Criminal Appeal No.745 of 2007 Shakil @ Sunil Abdul Raheman Khan .. .. Applicant (Orig. Accused No.2) v/s. The State of Maharashtra .. .. Respondent None for Applicant. Mrs.M.M. Deshmuk h, APP for Respondent ---- CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. Dated : 23rd August, 2007 P.C. : Heard the learned APP for the Respondent- State. This Application for condonation of delay has been filed by the Applicant (original Accused No.2) for condoning the delay of 4 years and 184 days in filing the above Appeal. This Application is filed through jail. We have perused the said Application and it appears that due to financial constraint and other difficulties, the Applicant could not lodge the above Appeal in time. The Appeal arises out of conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. Under the aforesaid circumstances, sufficient cause is made for condonation of delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona fide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, the delay in filing the above Appeal is condoned. The Application stands disposed of accordingly. ( DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.)

Order - Status 5: ata IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.785 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST)NO.574 OF 2011 Devendra @ Bittya Bhausaheb Padale and ors ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent None for the Applicants. Adv. P. S. Hingorani, A. P. P. for State. CORAM : NARESH. H. PATIL, & K. U. CHANDIWAL, J J. DATE : JULY 8, 2011 P.C. The Applications were called out twice. None appears for Applicants. S.O to 18.07.2011. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) ( NARESH H. PATIL, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 785 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 574 OF 2011 Devendra @ Bittya Bhausaheb Padale and Ors... Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondents Mr. Abhaykumar Apte i/by Mr. Avinash Kamkhedkar for the applicants. Mr. P.S. Hingorani, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATED : JULY 18, 2011 P.C. Heard. Perused the application. Delay is condoned. Application disposed off. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO.654 OF 2015 IN APPEAL ST.NO.599 OF 2015 Vinod Ramesh Pimple Applicant -Versus State of Maharashtra Respondent Mrs. Savita Prabhune for applicant Mrs. P.P.Bhosale, APP for State CORAM : A.R.JOSHI, J. DATE : 24th August 2015 P.C. 1] Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant on this application for condonation of delay of 30 days, in filing the appeal challenging the conviction for the offences under section 304 part II of IPC and also under section 323 and 325 of IPC. 2] Reportedly, the applicant is in jail. As such, the delay in preferring the appeal is condoned. Application is allowed. 3] Appeal is admitted. 4] Hearing of the application for bail/ suspension of sentence is S.O. for two weeks. ( A.R.JOSHI, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.58 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1067 OF 2004 RajeshApplicant Bachanu Dixit versus StateRespondent of Maharashtra Niranjan Mundargi for applicant. Ms.A.T.Javeri, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 28th January 2009 PC : Considering the nature of prayer made in the application, the propriety requires that the same should be placed before the learned Judge who has passed the order dated 23rd November 2004. Registry to act accordingly. (A.S.OKA, J.)

Order - Status 9: Shri Dev Kumar Singh ..... Applicant. V/s Rajesh @ Baba Bachanu Dixit and Ors. .... Respondents. Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for the applicant. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.58 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1067 OF 2004 Rajesh Bachanu Dixit ...... Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra ...... Respondent. Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for the applicant. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 20 th February, 2009 P.C:- Mentioned, not on board. Counsel for the applicant submitted that the place where the applicant has to surrender has not been mentioned in the order dated 11/2/2009 passed by this Court in the above application. Applicant is directed to surrender to Dahisar Police Station within one week from today. The order dated 11/2/2009 passed in the above application is modified accordingly. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the registry. (V.M. KANADE, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1367 OF 2012 Jude Okonkwo Chukwuemeka Appellant/Orig. accused vs. Union of India & Anr. Respondents Mr.Atul Sarpande, Advocate for the appellant. Y.N.Katpitia, Addl. P.P. For Union of India Ms. A.T.Jhaveri,APP,for the respondent-State CORAM: SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 12th April,2013. P.C. Learned Counsel for the appellant seeks leave to add documents. Leave as prayed for is granted. S.O. to 30.4.2013. (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1367 OF 2012 Jude Okonkwo Chukwuemeka Applicant/Accused vs. Union of India & Anr. Respondents Mr. Atul Sarpande i/b. Atul Sarpande & Associates,Advocate for the applicant. Ms.Y.N.Katpitia, Addl. P.P. For the Union of India. Ms. P.P.Shinde, APP,for the respondent-State CORAM: SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 12th July, 2013 P.C. The paper book be expedited. The paper book along with R & P shall be called for within a period of six weeks from today. The Counsel for the applicant is at liberty to file private paper book and mention the matter. The application for bail be heard along with the appeal. (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1367 OF 2012 Jude Okonkwo Chukwuemeka .. Applicant Vs. Union of India & Anr. .. Respondents None for the Applicant. Ms. Rebecca Gonsalvez a/w. Mr. H. S. Venegavkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1 – UOF. Ms. S. V. Sonawane, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2 – State. …. …. CORAM : A.R. JOSHI, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 12, 2014. P.C. : None present for the applicant in this application for bail during the pendency of the criminal Appeal. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 – Union of India stated that in the present matter, the appointment of the another counsel has not been continued and as such the matter may be adjourned for about three weeks so by that time the position would be clear whether said another counsel Mrs. Y. N. Katpitia would represent the Union of India or not. 2 Stand over to 20th February, 2014. (A. R. JOSHI, J.)

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED : 28th MARCH, 2014. P.C. On account of paucity of time, the following matters on the daily board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per CMIS: ....... Sr. Nos. Assigned Dates 9 02/05/2014 12 22/07/2014 13, 14, 21, 22, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 07/04/2014 15 22/08/2014 16, 17, 44, 45, 46, 50 11/04/2014 18, 19 22/09/2014 20, 23 23/09/2014 24, 25, 47, 48 08/04/2014 If any adinterim or interim relief granted in any of the above said matters, is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective assigned dates. If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before the Court. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. COMMON ORDER. CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 02.05.2014 P.C. On account of paucity of time rest of the matters on Daily Board are adjourned to dates fixed as per the CMIS (Court Management Information System) which read as under : Sr. Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date 15, 15, 16, 17 17 03/07/14 18 13/06/14 21 04/07/14 22 15/09/14 23, 35, 44, 24, 36, 46, 25, 37, 47, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 30, 40, 32, 41, 33, 42, 34, 43, 09/06/14 28 26/09/14 29 10/06/14 45 21/11/14 If in any of the above matters, ad interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates fixed in the matters. If adinterim or interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before this Court. The original of this order be kept in Sr.NO.15, Criminal Application No.66 of 2013 (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J )

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. COMMON ORDER. CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 07.07.2014 P.C. On account of paucity of time rest of the matters on Daily Board are adjourned to dates fixed as per the CMIS (Court Management Information System) which read as under : Sr. Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date 31, 31, 32, 34, 35, 38, 39, 40. 34, 35, 38, 39, 40. 18/07/14 37 08/08/14 42 25/08/14 45 20/08/14 47, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 51, 53. 49, 50, 51, 51, 53. 21/07/14 If in any of the above matters, ad interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates fixed in the matters. If adinterim or interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before this Court. The original of this order be kept in Sr.No.31, Criminal Application No.835 of 2014. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J )

Order - Status 23: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED: AUGUST 8, 2014. P.C.: On account of paucity of time, the following matters on the daily board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per CMIS: Sr. Nos. Assigned Dates 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 34, 906 20/08/2014 22 to 24 29/09/2014 25, 26, 46 30/09/2014 47, 48, 49 22/08/2014 27, 28, 40 to 43, 45 26/08/2014 29 20/08/2014 30 12/01/2015 31 13/01/2015 32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 44 21/08/2014 33 19/01/2015 If any ad-interim or interim relief granted in any of the above said matters, is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective assigned dates. If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before the Court. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Order - Status 26: Ladda IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 66 of 2013 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1367 of 2012 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's orders. Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders None for the appellant. Shri Ajay Patil, A.P.P.for the State. Ms Rebecca Gonsalves for Union of India. CORAM : A. R. JOSHI, J. DATE : 27th October, 2014. P.C. This is an application for bail during the pendency of the appeal. The accused has challenged conviction under NDPS Act. Bail application was earlier directed to be heard along with appeal. Specific directions were passed by this Court vide order dated 12th July,2013 for expediting preparation of paper book and calling of R & P. As such the matter be placed on final hearing board as per its turn. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) 1 of 1

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPEAL NO. 1367 OF 2012 Jude Okonkwo Chukwuemeka ....Appellant V/S Union Of India And Anr ....Respondent WITH CR. APPLICATION IN APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2013 In CR. APPEAL 1367 OF 2012 Jude Okonkwo Chukwuemeka ....Appellant V/S Union Of India And Anr ....Respondent None For Appellant Mr.V.V.Gangurde, APP for State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J DATE : 26th February, 2018 P.C. : Stand over to12/03/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )