All Civil Miscellaneous Application

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1086 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2004. Shri Amarnath Kapoor : Petitioner. versus. Shri D.S.Anand & Anr. : Respondents. Mr.S.V.Marwadi for the petitioner. Mr.D.R.More, APP, for the State. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 9th August 2004. P.C. Petitioner is permitted to serve the respondents by RPAD and also by Courier and produce acknowledgement and file affidavit before this Court. S.O. four weeks. ************** 1

Order - Status 13: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1086 OF 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. S.V.Marwadi for appellant. Mr. D.P.Adsule, APP for state. CORAM : V.M.KANADE, J. DATE : November 23, 2004. P.C. :- The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that appellant has filed an affidavit in which it is stated that the first notice sent by the appellant returned unserved and thereafter this court directed fresh notice to be issued. Accordingly, advocate's notice dated 23/8/2004 was taken to the address of Respondent No.1. However, he was not found at the said address on the said date. The notices were also sent to the first respondent by speed post and under certificate of posting on 17/9/2004. Inspite of the service none appears for the respondent. The appellant again to serve notice by speed post and under certificate of posting on respondent No.1 stating therein that on the next date i.e. on 9th December, 2004, the appeal will be finally heard. Office to issue similar notice. Call for record and proceedings. S.O.to 9/12/2004. Parties to act on the ordinary copy of the order duly authenticated.

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.2347 OF 2007 Hasnain Rohawala Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent. Mr Mustafa M. Najni, Adv.(appointed) for the applicant. Ms S. D. Shinde, A.P.P for the respondent. CORAM: V. C. DAGA,J. DATED: 23.10.2007. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. Perused the application and the material available on record. 3. There is no change in circumstance, so as to release the applicant on bail. 4. In the result, the present application stands rejected. 5. Any observation made in this order shall not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merits of the case at the time of trial. (V.C.DAGA,J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4723 OF 2005 (For Leave to Appeal) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra .....Appellant. V/s Yusuf Hasan Mulla & Ors. ..... Respondents. Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for the State. Mr. C.G. Patil i/b S.S. Patwardhan for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 & 6. ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 21 st August, 2007 P.C.: Heard the learned APP for the State and the learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 & 6. Appellant - State takes exception to the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ajara whereby the accused were acquitted of the offence punishable under section 153-B and 143 of the Indian Penal code. International one day Cricket match was held at Sharijah on 23/10/1991 between India and Pakistan and, in the said match, the Indian Cricket Team was defeated by Pakistan and it is alleged that the accused alongwith others celebrated defeat of the Indian Cricket Team at the hands of Pakistani Cricket Team and they shouted slogans and burst fire crackers. The trial court has considered the evidence on record and came to the conclusion that the prosecution has not established its case against the accused. I have perused the impugned judgment and order as also notes of evidence shown to me by the learned APP for the State. In my view, there is no infirmity in the order passed by the trial court. The judgment of the Supreme Court in Balwant Singh and another Vs. State of Punjab reported in AIR 1995 SC 1985 squarely applies to the facts of the present case. The Apex Court in the said judgment has observed that raising of some slogans, a couple of times by two individuals, without anything more, did not constitute any threat to the Government of India as by law established nor could the same give rise to feelings of enmity of hatred among different communities or religious or other groups. Leave is therefore refused. Appeal is dismissed. (V.M. KANADE, J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2005 State of Maharashtra V/s Applicant. Khandu Mahadu Hake Respondent. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge'sOrders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, ) - Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Mr.A.M. Shringarpure, APP for the State. CORAM:V.G. PALSHIKAR AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. 20.7.2005 PC: Heard. Application for leave to file the appeal is granted. Appeal admitted. Record and proceedings be called for. 20.7.05

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT None for Applicant Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, APP/Strate CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH D. NAIK J DATE : 14th June, 2021 P.C. : None appears for (Applicant / Respondent No. / APP). Stand over to 28/06/2021. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2021 Mrs. Tabassum Begum .. Applicant Vs. The State Of Maharashtra .. Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Hamminder Anand i/b H. S. Anand, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, A.P.P. for the State-Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 28th JUNE, 2021 PC. Issue notice to the respondent returnable in four weeks. In addition to Court notice, the applicant is permitted to serve the respondent by way of private notice. Stand over to 26.07.2021. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 26th July, 2021 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Stand over to 26/08/2021 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE J DATE : 26th August, 2021 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 29/09/2021. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Application No. 110 / 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (Zaidi) .. Applicant Versus. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent **** Mr. H.S. Anand, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Y.M. Nakhawa, APP for State. **** CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J. DATE : 11th OCTOBER,2021. P.C. : - Issue notice to the Respondent No.2 returnable on 7th December, 2021. Hamdast is permitted. In addition to the Court service, Applicant is permitted to serve the Respondent No.2 by private service and file affidavit of service. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) **Najeeb..**1/1 MOHAMMAD NAJEEB MOHAMMAD QAYYUM Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD NAJEEB MOHAMMAD QAYYUM Date: 2021.10.12 16:44:05 +0530

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 TABASSUM BEGUM WIFE OF MOHAMMED WAS SAYED (ZAIDI) ) APPLICANT V/S. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ) RESPONDENTS * * * * Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/by. Mr. Harminder Aanand, Advocate for the applicant. Smt. S.V. Sonawane, APP for State-respondent no.1. Ms. Jameela Damani, Advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J. Tuesday, 7th December, 2021. P.C. : Applicant is seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent no.2. Offce to verify the prayers and place it before the appropriate Court as per the Roaster. NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2021.12.07 16:33:00 +0530 (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 14th February, 2022 P.C. : Matter did not reach till the court time was over. Hence adjourned. Stand over to 10/03/2022. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr.H S ANAND for Applicant Adv.Jameela Damani for Respondent No.1 Mohd Wasi Sayzed. Ms. Anamika Malhotra, APP for State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR J DATE : 22nd April, 2022 P.C. : The Registry to verify and place the matter before the appropriate Court. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE J DATE : 14th July, 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 28/07/2022. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE J DATE : 28th July, 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 13/09/2022. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 30th November, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 22/12/2022 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 22nd December, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 30/01/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 30th January, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 24/02/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 30: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 24th February, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 03/03/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 3rd March, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 10/03/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI J DATE : 10th March, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 27/03/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 37: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Application No. 110 of 2021 Tabassum Begum W/o. Mohammed Wasi Sayed (Zaidi) ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. H. S. Anand, for the Applicant. None for the Respondent No.2. Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for the Respondent – State. Coram : R. N. Laddha, J. Date : 15 July 2024 P.C. . The learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant and his wife have resolved their disputes and they are staying together. The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application. Leave granted as prayed for. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn. R. N. Laddha, J.

Order - Status 8: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2612 OF 2006 Ganesh Ramchandra Aarde Versus The State of Maharashtra )Applicant )Respondent Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.S.B.Malvankar for the applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar APP for the State Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 27.7.2006. PC 1. This is an application for grant of bail. The applicant is shown as an accused alongwith another person in C.R.No.149/2006 registered by the Goregaon police station for offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, 420, 380, & 408 r/w 34 of IPC. The applicant was working as a peon in the office of the Complainant and he said to have stolen blank cheque and handed it to the co-accused who forged it and encashed it for the amount of Rs.1,82,000/ An : 2 : amount of Rs.1,71,800/- is recovered. This applicant is a peon and is arrested on 1.5.2006. Investigation is completed. In my view bail can be granted to the present applicant. It is therefore, directed that pending his trial in connection with C.R.No.149/2006 registered by the Goregaon police station, the applicant may be released on bail in the sum of Rs.5,000/ with one surety in the like amount subject to the condition that he will report to the Investigating officer once a month on every Monday till the disposal of the trial. Application stands disposed off. (R.S.Mohite,J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3060 OF 2010 Mr.Vishwanath Vitthal Shetty ...Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Niranjan Mundargi i/b. Mr.Shonak Mehta for the Applicant. Mr.S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : JULY 8, 2010 P.C. :- 1 Heard Counsel for the applicant and APP for the State. 2 The applicant has filed this application for reduction of the amount of surety which is to be furnished by him. The Sessions Judge has directed that the applicant should furnish surety in the sum of Rs.30,000/-. Initially, the applicant was permitted to furnish cash surety of Rs.30,000/-. 3 It is submitted that it is not possible for the applicant to furnish surety for the said sum and therefore, the amount may be reduced. It is submitted that applicant is residing permanently in Kurla along with his mother. It is further submitted that after the death of his father, the flat now is transferred in the name of his mother. 4 Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, the order passed by the Sessions Court is modified and the applicant is directed to execute P.R. Bond of Rs.10,000/- and furnish one or two sureties in the like amount. The remaining conditions imposed by the trial court are not altered or modified. After the surety is furnished, the amount of Rs.30,000/- deposited by the applicant may be returned to him. 5 Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.) 2

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 358 OF 2009 Sou. Ushadevi Sambhaji Patil ...... Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra ....... Respondent. Mr. A.P. Mundargi, Senior Counsel with Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for the applicant. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.359 OF 2009 Shri Sambhaji Anandrao Patil ....... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...... Respondent. Mr. A.P. Mundargi, Senior Counsel with Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for the applicant. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 17 th February, 2009 P.C.: Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants and the learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. Applicants apprehend arrest in connection with the offence punishable under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the present applicants have defrauded depositors to the tune of Rs 8,27,27,308/. In the affidavit in reply filed by the State it is stated that loans have been given to fictitious and bogus persons who are not in existence. Taking into consideration the allegations which are levelled in the complaint and the affidavit in reply filed by the State, no case is made out for grant of anticipatory bail. Both these applications for anticipatory bail are accordingly rejected. Both these applications are disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.414/2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.359/2009 Office notes,Office Memoranda of Coram Appearances,Court's orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's order Mr.Pradeep Gole for the Applicant Mr.Kharge,APP for State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. DATE : 7th October,2009 P.C. . The learned counsel for the applicant/ original accused submits that he has served the respondents thrice. However, despite of the service they are not appearing. This Revision Application is filed against the concurrent findings of the conviction of the Sessions Court ,Satara and the J.M.F.C. Satara. Thereby convicting the applicant for the offence punishable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act ordering the applicant/accused to pay compensation of Rs.30,000/- .The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has already deposited . Rs.30,000/- . The Revision Application is admitted. Issue notice to the respondents. R/o 30/11/2009. The bail application is pressed. The applicant accused is released on bail of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in like amount. The bail application is disposed of. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2321 OF 2007 Sunil Sukhdev Chandanshive Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.S.B.Pawar with Ms.Hema Sharma for applicant. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, APP for State. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. DATE : 18th July 2007 PC : Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. This is an application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail. I was taken through the statements made by one Mahendra Somnath Yadav and Smt.Radha Shrikrishna Wankhede who have graphically described the role of the applicant in the commission of the offence. At this stage, prima facie, it is not in dispute that the prima facie material showing positive role of the applicant in commission of the offence charged is available. The possibility of tampering with evidence and pressuring prosecution witnesses expressed by the learned Sessions Judge in order dated 2nd July 2007 while rejecting the bail application, that the applicant Sunil Chandanshive, if released on bail, cannot be ruled out. It gets strength from the character of the applicant which can be seen from the record. In the above view of the matter I am not inclined to grant bail. However, hearing of the trial is expedited. Criminal Application is accordingly rejected. (V.C.DAGA, J.)