All Bail Application

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J DATE : 4th May, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourn. Stand over to 21/06/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr.Raghuvanshi i/b Mr.Shailesh Kharat For Applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar - APP for State CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 21st June, 2018 P.C. : Learned APP waives service and seeks time to take instructions. Time as prayed for is granted. Stand over to 13/07/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr. Ashish Raghuvanshi I/by Mr. Shailesh Kharat for the Applicant. Mr. S.S.Pednekar, APP for the State. Coram : Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav **, J.** Date : 13th July, 2018 P.C.: 1 Learned APP has drawn the attention of this Court to the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ghodegaon rejecting the application filed by the prosecution seeking the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 164(5) of Cr.P.C. dated 9th June 2015. 2 Learned Magistrate shall comply with Sections 207 and 208 of Cr.P.C. Dusane 2/2 19 ba 1171.2018.doc 3 The prosecution is at liberty to file a fresh application before the Magistrate seeking the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. 4 Stand over to 1st August 2018. 5 Office to communicate this order to the learned J.M.F.C., Ghodegaon forthwith. ( Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav **, J)**

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1171 OF 2018 ….. Kaluram Bhagwan Kale …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. Shailesh Kharat for the Applicant. Ms Pallavi N. Dabholkar, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED: 20th AUGUST, 2018. P.C.: The learned APP submits that copies of the statements of the witnesses under Section 164 (5) of the Cr.P.C have now been furnished. She undertakes to furnish copy of the same to the learned counsel for the Applicant in the course of the day. In view of above, stand over to 3.9.2018. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) Megha Shridhar Parab Digitally signed by Megha Shridhar Parab Date: 2018.08.21 11:30:20 +0530

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr A.R. Avchat i/b Mr Shailesh Kharat For Applicant Ms Pallavi N. Dabholkar APP for State CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 3rd September, 2018 P.C. : At the request of Learned Advocate for the Applicant, Stand over to 17/09/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ….Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent Mr. Karan Jain i/b. Mr. Shailesh Kharat for the applicant. Ms. J.S. Lohokare, APP for the State. CORAM: SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED: 17th SEPTEMBER, 2018. P.C.: . Mr. Karan Jain, learned counsel for the applicant submits that copy of the statement of the witnesses under section 164 of Criminal Procedure Code has not been furnished. Ms. J.S. Lohokare, learned APP has furnished copy of the statement of witnesses today, in view of which learned counsel for the applicant seeks time. Stand over to 01st October, 2018. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent None For Applicant Mrs J.S. Lohokare APP for State CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 1st October, 2018 P.C. : None for Applicant. Opportunity Given. Stand Over to 15/10/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr Shailesh Kharat For Applicant Ms J.S. Lohokare APP for State CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 15th October, 2018 P.C. : At the request of Learned Advocate for the Applicant, Stand Over to 17/10/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr Shailesh Kharat For Applicant Mrs J.S. Lohokare APP for State CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 17th October, 2018 P.C. : At the request of Ld.APP for State, Stand Over to 31/10/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr Milan A. Heliballi i/b Mr Shailesh Kharat For Applicant Ms Pallavi N. Dabholkar APP for State CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 31st October, 2018 P.C. : Mentioned. At the request of Learned Advocate for the Applicant, Stand Over to 26/11/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICTION NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram B.Kale ...Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Mr. M.A. Hebballi i/by Shailesh Kharat for the Applicant. Smt. S.S.Lohokare, APP. for the Respondent/State. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE 26th November, 2018 PC : The learned counsel for the applicant seeks time on the ground that, the Advocate on record is held up in another Court. The record indicates that on 3.9.2018 and 17.9.2018 the learned counsel for the applicant had sought time. Again on 1.10.2018 none appeared for the applicant and this Court adjourned the matter to 15.10.2018. Again on 15.10.2018 and 31.10.2018 the learned counsel for the applicant had sought time. It appears that, the applicant is not interested in pursuing the application. Application is dismissed for want of prosecution. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 30: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Shailesh Kharat For Applicant. Mr.S.H.Yadav, APP For State. CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J DATE : 10th April, 2019 P.C. : On the application of learned APP for want of instructions and as the I.O.is not present, Stand over to 10.06.2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Shailesh Kharat For Applicant S.H.Yadav APP for the State/Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 10th June, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned APP for the State/ respondent, Stand over to 17/06/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 17th June, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 09/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 9th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 23/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 38: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 23rd July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 07/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 40: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Shailesh Kharat For Applicant S.H.Yadav APP for State/Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 7th August, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned APP for State/respondent , Stand over to 06/09/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 42: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 6th September, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 26/09/2019 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 44: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr.Shailesh Kharat For Applicant. Mr.S.H.Yadav, APP For State. CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 26th September, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the petitioners / respondent / applicant , Stand over to 06/11/2019 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 48: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1171 OF 2018 Kaluram Bhagwan Kale ...Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent …. Mr. Shailesh Kharat, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for State-Respondent. …. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 6th November 2019 PC : Without advancing any arguments on the merits of the case, the learned counsel for the Applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to prefer an application before the Sessions Court, in view of the fact that, during the pendency of this application, co-accused has been granted bail. Hence, the application to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) 1 of 1 6-BA-1171-18.doc

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.966 OF 2013 MR.SHABBU RAUF KHAN )...APPLICANT V/s. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. )...RESPONDENTS Mr.Satyavrat Joshi i/b. Mr.Subhash Hulyalkar Advocate for Applicant. Mrs.S.V.Sonawane APP for the State. CORAM: ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATE : rd JULY, 2013. 3 P.C. : 1 Heard. 2 Since the period of three moths stipulated by the order dated 12.4.2013 is not over, the application is premature, so to say. 3 However, in the circumstances explained by the learned counsel for the applicant, instead of rejecting the application on that ground, it would be proper to consider it after 12.7.2013. 4 Stand over to 16.7.2013. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.) avk 1/1

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.966 OF 2013 SHABBU RAUF KHAN )...APPLICANT V/s. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. )...RESPONDENTS Mr.Satyavrat Joshi i/b. Mr.Subhash Hulyalkar Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs.G.P.Mulekar APP for the State. CORAM: ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATE : 16th JULY, 2013. P.C. : 1 Heard Mr.Satyavrat Joshi, the learned counsel for the applicant, and Mrs.G.P.Mulekar, the learned APP for the State. 2 The previous application filed by the applicant was withdrawn by him, after submitting that the applicant be granted liberty to apply afresh for bail, should the trial not commence within a reasonable time. Liberty was granted by the court to the applicant to apply afresh for bail, in the event of the trial not commencing within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of the said order by the court. The order was passed on 12.4.2013. 3 I am informed that, though the said period is over, the trial has not yet commenced. The learned counsel for the applicant has produced a copy of the roznama of the trial court, which indicates that the trial has not yet commenced, and that, even a Charge has not yet been framed. 4 I have, therefore, considered the facts of the case, afresh. It is clear that though the participation of the applicant in the alleged incident, is indicated by the material in the chargesheet, the role attributed to the applicant is not as grave, as has been attributed to, two other accused. The applicant is alleged to have given a blow to the deceased by a pana on the wrist of the deceased. 5 The applicant is of 19 years. There are no antecedents. The applicant is in custody for a period of more than nine months. 6 Under these circumstances, I am inclined to grant one opportunity to the applicant of availing of liberty, subject to certain conditions. 7 The application is allowed. 8 The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.50,000/, with one surety in the like amount, or two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/ each, on the following conditions : i) The applicant shall not contact, meet or approach any of the prosecution witnesses, in any manner, whatsoever. ii) The applicant shall report to the Pimpri Police Station every Sunday, between 5.00 p.m. to 7.00 p.m., till the disposal of the case against him. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1031 OF 2020 … Chinmay Prashant Jagtap .. Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent None for the applicant. Smt. M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the State. CORAM: SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 10TH DECEMBER, 2020 P.C:- Re-notify after Christmas Vacation. SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J Wakodikar

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1031 OF 2020 ..... Chinmay Prashant Jagtap ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents ….... Mr. Prashant Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt. J. S. Lohokare, APP for State-Respondent. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 05th FEBRUARY, 2021 P.C. : . At the request of learned APP, stand over to 16th March (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1031 OF 2020 Chinmay Prashant Jagtap .... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents ….... Mr.Pravin Mengane h/f Prashant P. Patil, Advocate for Applicant. Mr.S.H. Yadav, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 16th MARCH, 2021 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant, stand over to 27/04/2021. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1031 OF 2020 Chinmay Prashant Jagtap APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Pravin P. Mengane i/b Prashant P Patil for applicant. P.N.Dabholkar APP for Respondent/state. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIRENDRASINGH GYANSINGH BISHT J DATE : 22nd November, 2021 P.C. : S. O. to 06/12/2021 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1031 OF 2020 Chinmay Prashant Jagtap APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Mr. Sandeep Shinde a/w Mr. Pravin Mengane i/b Prashant P Patil for Applicant Ms. P.N.Dabholkar APP for Respondent State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIRENDRASINGH GYANSINGH BISHT J DATE : 6th December, 2021 P.C. : Arguments are concluded. Judgment/ order is reserved. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1031 OF 2020 Chinmay Prashant Jagtap … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents Mr. Sandeep D. Shinde a/w Mr. Pravin Mengane i/b Mr. Prashant Patil, for the Applicant. Ms. P. N.Dabholkar, APP, for the State-Respondent. CORAM : V. G. BISHT, J. RESERVED ON : 6th December, 2021. PRONOUNCED ON : 15th December, 2021. PC:- . The present application has been moved by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in C.R. No. 476 of 2017 registered with Karad Taluka Police Station, District-Satara for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120-B r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2 It is the case of prosecution that informant is uncle of deceased Prathamesh Sanjay Sankpal, who was a student of 12th standard Rekha Patil 1/5 studying in Y.C.College of Science at Vidyanagar, Karad. The applicant and two more students, who are stated to be juveniles in conflict with law, were also studying in the same college. On 17/11/2017 the deceased left his house for college as there was examination but did not return. 3 The prosecution alleges that the relations between the deceased and the applicants and other co-accused were not cordial and therefore, on 17/11/2017 at about 4-00 p.m. they committed murder of the deceased in the area known as 'Bhatki Shiva' near railway line in the vicinity of village Parle, Taluka Karad by means of knife and scythe. Accordingly FIR came to be lodged. 4 Mr. Shinde, learned Counsel for the applicant, submits that there was college rivalry between the deceased and the applicant and another. Although it is alleged that the deceased was assaulted by means of a knife on head, face and neck but those injuries did not match with the findings of Postmortem Report. Although the charge-sheet has been filed but trial is yet to be commenced. Having regard to the circumstance and as also age of the applicant, he deserves to be enlarged on bail. Rekha Patil 2/5 5 Ms. Dabholkar, learned APP, on the other hand, vehemently opposed the submissions by contending that there is statement of eye witness, namely, Yogesh Tanaji Shedge who had witnessed the incident and even the deceased himself had confided to Vishwajit @ Vishu Krushnarao Pawar on 17/11/2017 that he is likely to be beaten. Besides, the Postmortem Report also point out the injuries sustained by the deceased which is quite in consonance with the theory of prosecution. There is no inconsistency between findings of Postmortem Report and theory of prosecution as is claimed by learned counsel for the applicant. According to learned APP, since the deceased was mercilessly killed the applicant does not deserve to be enlarged on bail. 6 Perused investigation papers. First of all, I may from the FIR point out that the informant has clearly stated that there were injury marks on the head and neck of the deceased by means of a sharp weapon. Column No. 17 of the Postmortem Report clearly shows that there were multiple superficial to deep incised wounds over scalp, face and neck. Thus apparently there is no inconsistency, except wound on face, between the case of prosecution and finding of the Postmortem Report as canvased before me by learned Counsel for the applicant. 7 This brings me to the statements of eye witness viz. Kiran @ Ganesh Shivaji Thorat. From the statement of this witness it is very much clear that he witnessed the whole incident. According to this witness, the hands of deceased was caught hold of by accused Vijay while the applicant took out a scythe from his sack which was given to him by accused Vijay only and then gave a blow on the head of the deceased as a result of which deceased fell down. Even thereafter the applicant gave three blows of scythe on the neck of the deceased. After the deceased died, the applicant threatened the others including the witnesses that if any of them disclosed the incident they would be similarly done to death. His statement further shows that because of threats given by the applicant and as he is of hot temperament, this witness did not tell about the incident to anybody. Incidentally, I may note from the Postmortem Report that the cause of death was " Head injury due to multiple incised wounds associated with fracture skull bone". 8 One more statement is that of Vishwajit @ Vishu Krushnarao Pawar. It appears that on 17/11/2017 when witness had been to college for examination, deceased called him and expressed his apprehension that he would be beaten by the boys. When this witness Rekha Patil 4/5 enquired with him as to who were those boys, the deceased replied that he would tell later on. At about 3-30 p.m. this witness saw applicant and other accused and as also the deceased standing in front of them. 9 From the above, it is clear that the witness, namely, Vishwajit @ Vishu Krushnarao Pawar had seen the applicant and other accused in the company of the deceased immediately before the incident. It is also pertinent to note that the deceased had expressed his apprehension of his being beaten at the hands of boys though he did not name those boys. However, immediately thereafter incident took place and it appears that those boys were applicant and others which is more than clear from the statement of Kiran @ Ganesh Shivaji Thorat. 10 From the above, I find that there is overwhelming evidence. The injured was brutally killed by the applicant by means of scythe. I do not find merit in the application. Hence, the following order. ORDER Bail Application No. 1031 of 2020 is rejected. REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2021.12.15 12:42:49 +0530 Rekha Patil 5/5 (V. G. BISHT, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent .................... Ms. Sakshi Mane, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for Respondent – the State of Maharashtra. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 15, 2025 P.C . : 1. Mentioned out of turn. 2. Heard Ms. Mane, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Bajoria, learned APP for Respondent – the State of Maharashtra. 3. This is an Application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') seeking Bail in connection with C.R. No.408 of 2023 registered with Shil Diaghar Police Station, Thane for offence under Sections 376(2)(n), 328 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. 4. Issue notice to private Respondent No.2. Ms. Bajoria, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – the State of Maharashtra waives service on behalf of State of Maharashtra. 5. Humdast permitted. In addition to Court's notice, Applicant is directed to serve and inform Respondent No.2 about the next date of hearing by any permissible mode of service and file appropriate affidavit of service with tangible proof thereof. 6. Private Respondent can through the Investigating Officer of the case inform whether she requires legal representation. Concerned Investigating Officer shall also convey this order to the Private Respondent who is now major through a lady Police Officer and file appropriate report to that effect on information received from Private Respondent No.2. Copy of Application shall be served on Complainant through Investigating Officer within a period of two weeks from today. 7. Stand over to 22 nd January, 2025. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2025.01.15 18:15:45 +0530

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 22, 2025. P.C.: 1. Due to paucity of time, the following matters are adjourned to future dates as follows:- Serial No. Adjourned date 2, 6, 7, 41, 43, 44, 46, 48 to 51, 53 to 63, 65, 67 to 75 and 77 to 90 24th February 2025 91 to 98 25th February 2025 2. In the meanwhile, ad-interim / interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Digitally signed by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.01.23 10:49:41 +0530

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent .................... Ms. Sakshi Mane, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganpathy, APP for Respondent State of Maharashtra. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 28, 2025 P.C . : 1. Heard Ms. Mane, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Ganpathy, learned APP for Respondent – State of Maharashtra. 2. This is an Application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') seeking Bail in connection with C.R. No.408 of 2023 registered with Shil Daighar Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 328 and 506 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 67 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000. 3. Applicant is directed to serve Respondent No.2 as remark shows that 'spare copies has not been supplied'. Let spare copies be supplied to Department and service be effected within a period of one week from today. 4. Stand over to 04 th February, 2025. To be placed under the caption 'Medical Urgency'. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2025.01.28 14:29:37 +0530

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents .................... Ms. Sakshi S. Mane for Applicant Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for State Mr. Santosh V. Chavan, API, Shil Daighar Police Station, Thane is present ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 04, 2025 P. C . : 1. Heard. 2. In view of the directions contained in paragraph No. 6 of the order dated 15.01.2025, Respondent No. 2 has consented for appointment of Advocate through legal aid to espouse and represent her case. In that view of the matter, I direct High Court Legal Services Committee to appoint Ms. Kavisha Khanna, learned Advocate practicing as Advocate in this Court (Contact No. 9619197448) to represent and espouse the cause of Respondent No. 2 through the Legal Aid. High Court Legal Services Committee shall give appointment letter to her to that effect. 3. Copy of the Bail Application shall be handed over to the Appointed Advocate by learned Advocate for Applicant immediately. 4. Stand over to 18th February, 2025 Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Digitally signed by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date: 2025.02.04 14:34:06 +0530 2 of 2

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2025 P.C . : 1. Due to paucity of time, the following matters are adjourned to future dates as follows:- Serial Nos. Adjourned date 37 to 50, 52, 53 and 55 to 60 25th February, 2025 61 to 80 26th February, 2025 81 to 100 27th February, 2025 101 to 117 28th February 2025 2. In the meanwhile, ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue. Ajay [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Digitally signed by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.02.18 15:01:05 +0530 Ajay

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 28, 2025 P.C . : 1. Due to paucity of time, the following matters are adjourned to future dates as follows:- Serial Nos. Adjourned date 36 to 50 04th April 2025 51 to 70 07th April 2025 71 to 90 08th April 2025 91 to 99, 101 to 108, 110 to 112 and 114 09th April 2025 2. In the meanwhile, ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue. Ajay [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Digitally signed by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.03.01 13:09:10 +0530

Order - Status 15: HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents .................... Ms. Sakshi Mane, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for Respondent No.1. CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : MARCH 05, 2025 P.C . : 1. Heard Ms. Mane, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Bajoria, learned APP for Respondent No.1. ................... 2. Prima facie, it is seen that Application has been ingeniously moved on medical grounds so that it can be listed and get priority hearing and it is sought to be argued on merits. 3. Be that as it may, I would like to ascertain the medical status of Applicant from Chief Medical Officer of Prison Hospital where the Applicant is lodged whether Applicant is indeed suffering from Tuberculosis. I am informed by Ms. Mane that Applicant is lodged in Thane Central Prison. 4. Chief Medical Officer of Thane Central Prison shall make appropriate report about the medical status of Applicant to inform the Court within a period of one week after which further directions will be passed. 5. Stand over to 12 th March, 2025. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

Order - Status 17: HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : MARCH 12, 2025 P.C . : 1. Due to paucity of time, the following matters are adjourned to a future dates as follows:- Serial Nos. Adjourned date 32, 38, 41, 44, 46, 48, 49, 53, 55, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70 and 72. 05th May, 2025 73, 81, 82, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 92, 95, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103 06th May, 2025 2. In the meanwhile, ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2025.03.13 12:17:45 +0530

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Ms. Sakshi Mane for Applicant Ms. Kavisha Khanna for Respondent No.2 Ms. Megha Bajoria, APP for State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 8th April, 2025 P.C. : S. O. to 13/06/2025 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 13th June, 2025 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 08/07/2025 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 23: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Ms. Sakshi S. Mane for the Applicant. Ms. Kavisha Khanna (Appointed as legal aid counsel) for Respondent No. 2. Mrs. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for Respondent / State. Mr. Niteen Belge, Shil Daighar Police Station, Thane City is present. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 27th June, 2025 P.C. : S. O. to 08/07/2025 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 8th July, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 18/08/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )