Gulabidevi Jayantiprasad Santoshi vs. Jayantiprasad Shadalram Santoshi

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1822 OF 2009 Gulabidevi Jayantiprasad Santoshi. Versus Appellant. Jayantiprasad Shadalram Santoshi & Ors. Respondents. Mr. A. M. Saraogi for the Appellants. None for the Respondents. I CORAM : A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 3RD DECEMBER,2009. P. C.: Issue notice to respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4, returnable on 11th January, 2010. Humdast permitted. Sd/ (A. A. SAYED, J.) 1

Order - Status 10: vss THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1822 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's order or Directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders S.N. Fatima h/f A.M. Saraogi for Appellant Ι Mr.S.J. Ghogare for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J. DATED: MARCH 29, 2010 P.C.: The advocate for the appellant has not supplied the fresh address for serving respondent Nos.3 and 4. S.O. for two weeks. It is made clear that if respondent Nos.3 and 4 are not served within that period, the appeal to stand dismissed against respondent Nos.3 and 4. The advocate for the appellant may also serve them by private notice. Mr.Ghogare appears for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

Order - Status 12: vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1822 OF 2009 Smt.Gulabidevi Jayantiprasad Santoshi ... Appellant V/s. Shri Jayantiprasad Shadalram Santoshi & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.A.M. Saraogi i/b Sayed Nisar Fatima for Appellant Mr.S.J. Ghogare for Respondents CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: APRIL 12, 2010 P.C.: Mr.Ghogare, appearing for the respondents, points out that the impugned judgment in the present first appeal is a common judgment passed in four suits. The appellant had filed First Appeal No.1837 of 2009 in respect of S.C. Suit No.5495 of 2003. That appeal was dismissed on February 26, 2010. The learned advocate therefore submits that the same order must follow in the present appeal. Mr.Saraogi, appearing for the appellant, states that the appellant is filing a review petition in that matter and therefore these appeals should be adjourned. S.O. for four weeks. It is made clear that if the review petition is dismissed, the same order as was passed on February 26, 2010 in First Appeal No.1837 of 2009 will follow in the present appeal.

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1822 OF 2009 IN SHORT CAUSE SUIT NO.5498 OF 2003 ......... Gulabdevi Jayantiprasad Santoshi Appellant Vs. Jayantiprasad Shadalram Santoshi and ors. Respondents Mr.A.M.Saraogi, for appellant. Mr.Sagar Ghogre, for respondents. ......... CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 7th JUNE, 2010. P.C. : Mr.Saraogi, learned counsel for appellants, states that against the order dated 26th February, 2010 passed in First Appeal No.1837 of 2009 a Review Petition is filed in this Court in the month of April, 2010. He states that he will serve copy of the said review petition on the learned counsel appearing for respondents. 2] The statements are accepted. List the First Appeal after four weeks. In the meantime, learned counsel for appellant will move the appropriate Court for deciding the review petition. S.O. for four weeks.

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1822 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICAITON NOS.2852 and 2853 OF 2009 IN F.A.NO.1822 of 2009 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. A. M. Saraogi, for the appellant. Ms.Anita Patil i/b S.J.Ghogre, for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 08/12/2010 PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr Saraogi, learned counsel for the appellant, prays for withdrawal of this appeal with liberty to the appellant to adopt appropriate remedy for redressal of her grievance. The First Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. While granting liberty, I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on rights of the parties or examined merits of the case. If any such proceedings is filed by the appellant, same may be considered in accordance with law. The civil applications are also disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)