Session Court

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr. Aashish Satpute for Applicant. Mr. Pandurang H. Gaikwad, APP for State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 15th January, 2024 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant , stand over to 29/01/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 29th January, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 07/02/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 7th February, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 01/03/2024 ( H. O. B.). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 1st March, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 15/03/2024 ( at 12:30 pm). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 15th March, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 19/03/2024 ( at 12:30 pm). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 19th March, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 15/04/2024 ( at 12:30 pm). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr. Amit Icham for Applicant. Mr. Pandruang H. Gaikwad, APP for State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 15th April, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 06/05/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 6th May, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 01/07/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 1st July, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 08/07/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 8th July, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 11/07/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr. Advait Tamhankar i/by Mr. Aashish Satpute for Applicant. Mr. Pandurang H. Gaikwad, APP for State/Respondent. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 11th July, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 19/07/2024 ( at 2:30 pm). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 27: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 19th July, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 23/08/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr. Chaitanya Purankar i/by Mr. Amit Icham for Applicant. Mr. Pandurang H. Gaikwad, APP for State/Respondent. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 23rd August, 2024 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant , stand over to 13/09/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 33: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.161 OF 2024 Mohammed Farukh Mohammed Umar Tak ] Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ] Respondent Mr.Advait Tamhankar i/b Aashish Satpute for the Applicant. Ms.Sangita Phad, APP for the State. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J RESERVED ON : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRONOUNCED ON : 3rd OCTOBER, 2024. P.C. : 1 The Applicant/Accused in Crime No.6/2022 registered with Pune ATS, is seeking regular bail. 2 The aforesaid offence is made punishable under Section 8(c), 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, (for short "NDPS Act"). 3 The Applicant, on secret inputs was apprehended on 02.05.2022 after having found in possession of 118 Grams of Mephedrone costing around Rs.11,80,000/-. The seizure carried out in the investigation of the aforesaid offence, is of commercial quantity. 4 In the aforesaid backdrop, the learned counsel for the Applicant while seeking regular bail would urge that the Respondent/Investigating Officer has failed to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act. So as to substantiate the aforesaid contention, my attention is invited to the nature, the mode and manner in which the recovery was effected from the Applicant. The learned counsel would urge that since it is mandatory to follow the procedure laid down in the aforesaid provisions of the NDPS Act, the Applicant is entitled to be released on bail, as the recovery was neither effected by a Gazetted Officer, nor search. 5 The learned APP, while opposing the prayer for bail would urge that not only the mandatory procedure prescribed under Section 50 read with 41 to 43 of the NDPS Act is complied with, but also the report of Chemical Analyser certifies the contraband seized from the Applicant, being banned substance. It is claimed that the Applicant is already charge-sheeted and there is enough iota of evidence to directly connect the Applicant to the crime. As such, it is urged that the Application is liable to be rejected. 2/4 6 Having appreciated the rival claims, it is appreciated that on specific inputs the Applicant was apprehended on 02.05.2022 at about 6.30 p.m. and he was sensitized about his right under Section 41, 42, 43 and 50. The written consent given by the Applicant for carrying out personal search by the Police Officer sufficiently speaks of compliance of the statutory mandate as provided under the NDPS Act. 7 Apart from above, the station diary entry was made about the offence and the same was immediately forwarded to the immediate superior by the Assistant Police Inspector. As such, there is compliance of Section 42, so also Section 50. 8 Apart from above, the quantity seized from the Applicant appears to be certified by the Chemical Analyser to be a banned substance under the NDPS Act. The said quantity is commercial in nature. In the aforesaid backdrop, prima-facie, no technical flaw could be noticed in the investigation against the Applicant. Perusal of the investigation papers depict that there is strong evidence available against the Applicant so as to infer his prima facie involvement in the offence in question and the offence being grave in nature, I see no reason to consider and grant the prayer for releasing the Applicant on bail. 9 Apart from above, the Courts below have consequently rejected his regular Bail Applications by recording the cogent reasons. In this background, the Application stands rejected. (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 358 OF 2009 Sou. Ushadevi Sambhaji Patil ...... Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra ....... Respondent. Mr. A.P. Mundargi, Senior Counsel with Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for the applicant. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.359 OF 2009 Shri Sambhaji Anandrao Patil ....... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...... Respondent. Mr. A.P. Mundargi, Senior Counsel with Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for the applicant. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 17 th February, 2009 P.C.: Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants and the learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. Applicants apprehend arrest in connection with the offence punishable under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the present applicants have defrauded depositors to the tune of Rs 8,27,27,308/. In the affidavit in reply filed by the State it is stated that loans have been given to fictitious and bogus persons who are not in existence. Taking into consideration the allegations which are levelled in the complaint and the affidavit in reply filed by the State, no case is made out for grant of anticipatory bail. Both these applications for anticipatory bail are accordingly rejected. Both these applications are disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.414/2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.359/2009 Office notes,Office Memoranda of Coram Appearances,Court's orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's order Mr.Pradeep Gole for the Applicant Mr.Kharge,APP for State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. DATE : 7th October,2009 P.C. . The learned counsel for the applicant/ original accused submits that he has served the respondents thrice. However, despite of the service they are not appearing. This Revision Application is filed against the concurrent findings of the conviction of the Sessions Court ,Satara and the J.M.F.C. Satara. Thereby convicting the applicant for the offence punishable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act ordering the applicant/accused to pay compensation of Rs.30,000/- .The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has already deposited . Rs.30,000/- . The Revision Application is admitted. Issue notice to the respondents. R/o 30/11/2009. The bail application is pressed. The applicant accused is released on bail of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in like amount. The bail application is disposed of. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)

Order - Status 5: CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 99 OF 2012 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant vs. Avit @ Pintu Anant Bhole ...Respondent Mrs.U.V. Kejriwal, APP for the Applicant-State. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. FEBRUARY 1, 2012 P.C. :- Heard the learned APP for the applicant. Rule, returnable on 21st March, 2012. In addition to court service, private service is also permitted. (A.V. POTDAR, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)

Order - Status 9: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.99 OF 2012 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders. Registrar's orders. Ms Sangeeta D. Shinde, APP for the Applicant. Shri Pankaj D. Kavale for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S. OKA & SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ DATE : 21ST MARCH, 2012 P.C.: . Heard the learned APP for the Applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent who has opposed this application. The delay of 28 days in preferring the application for leave to appeal has been adequately explained. Sufficient cause is made out. Delay is condoned. The Rule is accordingly made absolute. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J) (A.S.OKA, J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.325 OF 2009 Hemant Digamber Pawar 2. Sandeep @ Balya Rajbali Manohar ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent --- Shri Teja Katdhare for Applicants Shri S.S. Pednekar APP for State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. The Applicants are arrested in connection with an offence punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 302, 324,504 of the Indian Penal Code registered at Kolshewadi Police Station, Kalyan (East),Dist. Thane on 20.3.2008. The chargesheet has been filed. It is alleged that the Applicants along with others had assaulted the Complainant and others with sticks and, as a result, one Gopal Dhumal had received injuries and he thereafter, succumbed to the injuries on 22.3.2008. In the first information, it has been stated that some unknown persons have assaulted the deceased and others. Perusal of the material, which is on record shows that there are contradictions in respect of the statements of eye witnesses. Exact number of persons, who had assaulted the complainant and others differs from witness to witness. No specific role, otherwise, has been attributed to the present Applicants. Applicants have not been identified by the Complainant since no identification parade has been held by the Investigating Officer. Under these circumstances, in my view, prima facie case is made out for grant of bail. The Applicants be released on bail in a sum of Rs.5,000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount. The Applicants shall report to the Koleshwadi Police Station, Kalyan (East), Dist. Thane once in a month. Application is disposed of. V.M. KANADE J.

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Cri.Application No.64 of 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers & Anr. …… Applicants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …... Respondents. --- Mr Jatin Karia (Shah) a/w Ms Dipti J Karia a/w Ms Snehanlata Munj a/w Ms Shraddha Kamble a/w Ms Preeti SG for the applicants. Dr Ashwini A Takalkar, APP for respondent No.1/State. --- Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 21 January 2025. P.C. : Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By a judgment and order dated 12.09.2024, the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, 70th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai, in CC No.7002519/SS/2018, convicted applicant No.1 and 2 for the offences punishable under Sections 138 read with 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 ('NI Act'). Applicant No.2 was sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for six months and pay fine of Rs.3,00,000/- Page No. 1 of 3 21 January 2025 within two months, with default stipulations. Aggrieved, the applicants filed a criminal appeal bearing No.648 of 2024 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, along with a miscellaneous application bearing No.2255 of 2024 for suspension of the sentence. By an order dated 19.11.2024, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, suspended the sentence imposed subject to the payment of 50% of the fine/compensation within 60 days. Dissatisfied, the applicants have approached this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The learned Counsel representing the applicants submits that the requirement to deposit 50% of the amount set by the Additional Sessions Judge is excessive and disproportionate, without any justification. The learned Counsel further submits that the applicants are in a financial difficulty and to show their bonafides, they are ready to deposit 20% instead of 50% of the fine/ compensation amount awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge within three weeks from today with the trial Court. Page No. 2 of 3 21 January 2025 Considering the material on record and the arguments advanced across the Bar, the sentence shall be suspended in the ad-interim subject to the applicants depositing 20% of the fine amount before the trial Court within three weeks from the date of uploading of this order. Issue notice to respondent No.2. Stand over to 24 March 2025. [ R. N. Laddha,J. ] Page No. 3 of 3 21 January 2025

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Digitally signed by CHITRA SONAWANE Date: 2025.03.24 16:36:48 +0530 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Cri.Application No.62 of 2025 With Cri.Application No.63 of 2025 With Cri.Application No.64 of 2025 With Cri.Application No.65 of 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers & Anr. …… Applicants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …... Respondents. Mr Jatin P Karia (Shah) a/w Ms Snehankita M Munj and Ms Shraddha Kamble for the applicants. Ms Dr AA Takalkar, APP for respondent/State in APL/63/2025 and APL/65/2025. Mr VN Sagare, APP for State in APL/62/2025. Mr PH Gaikwad, APP for State in APL/64/2025. Mr MA Bastiri for respondent No.2. Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 24 March 2025. P.C. : The applicants to provide the copies of these applications to the learned Counsel for respondent No.2. Interim relief granted earlier shall continue to operate Page No. 1 of 2 24 March 2025 Chitra Sonawane 45-APL-62-2025.doc till the next date. Stand over to 13 June 2025. [ R. N. Laddha,J. ] Page No. 2 of 2 24 March 2025

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 62 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 63 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 64 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 65 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 17th June, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 01/07/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 62 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 63 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 64 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 65 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK J DATE : 8th July, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 29/07/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )