Small Cause Court

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.8907 OF 2007 : Office Notes, Office Memoranda of coram, appearances, Court's orders : or directions and Registrar's orders. : Court's or Judge's orders. : : : None for the petitioner. None for the respondent. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. : . Since morning this matter has been called out twice and on both occasions none appears for the petitioners. In the circumstances, I am constrained to dismiss this petition for non prosecution. Order accordingly. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)

Order - Status 7: ingale IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6447 OF 2013 Smt.Ashwini Ravindra Pingle .. Petitioner Vs. Shri Sanjay Ramchandra Kamthe and another .. Respondents Mr.Avinash B.Avhad, for Petitioner. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 01st August, 2013 P.C. : . The application for amendment in the written statement is rejected. Mr.Avhad, the learned Counsel for petitioner states that simply because, the matter is at the stage of final argument, that could not have been reason for rejecting the application for amendment. It was only at that point of time, the petitioner got the knowledge of the other properties owned by the plaintiff and given for redevelopment. The defendant had given details in the application, only because the defendant could not get the relevant documents, that could not have been the ground of denying the amendment application. According to the learned Counsel, the ground for eviction agitated by plaintiff is bonafide requirement. The said amendment would be relevant and material for effective adjudication of the dispute. The plaintiff had filed say to the application denying the said fact. The Court has observed that not a single document is produced along with the application substantiating the factum of the plaintiff possessing the survey No. 87 and given it for redevelopment. The parties have concluded the evidence. The plaintiff has even advanced his final argument. The matter was adjourned thrice for the argument of the defendant and thereafter, present application has been filed. The Court has considered the said aspect of the matter. I do not see any error committed by the Court while passing impugned order. The petitioner may assail the said order in case is required to file the appeal, if in law as it is permissible, relying on section 105 of C.P.C. The Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ( S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) 909.wp.6447.13

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.735 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr.Rajesh Dixit i/b M/s.V.R.Tripathi for the applicant CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATED : 23/06/2014 PC : . Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the applicant, matter is taken on board for urgent orders. 2 By this Revision Application, appellant org.defendant challenges the order dt.28.04.2014 passed by Appellate Bench of Small Causes Court at Bombay in A1 Appeal No.222 of 2007. 3 Office note shows that Advocate Ramchandranarayan Jawal filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent. Hence, applicant is directed to serve respondent by private notice either by registered post A.D. and/or by hand delivery and file Affidavit of Service to that effect. 4 Matter to appear on board for admission on 9.7.2014. (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION. CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.735 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. V. R. Tripathi for the Applicant. Mr. Ramchandranarayan Jawal for the Respondent. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JUNE 25, 2014 P.C.: Mentioned. Not on board. At the request of learned counsel for the Appellant, the matter is taken on board. By consent of the parties, S.O. to 16th July 2014. The learned counsel for the Respondent makes a statement that till next date Respondent will not take any coercive action against the Appellant pursuant to the order passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court in A1 Appeal No.222 of 2007. Same is accepted. S.O. to 16th July 2014. JUDGE

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM: MR. K.R. SHRIRAM, J DATED: JANUARY 20, 2015. P.C.: On account of paucity of time, the following matters on the daily board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per CMIS: Sr. Nos. Assigned Dates 51, 52, 53, 57, 60, 61 04/02/2015 54, 55, 62, 64, 65 09/02/2015 56, 66, 67, 68 10/02/2015 2.If any ad-interim or interim relief granted in any of the above said matters, is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective assigned dates. 3.If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before the Court. (MR. K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM: K.R. SHRIRAM, J. DATED: MARCH 03, 2015. P.C.: On account of paucity of time, the following matters on the daily board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per CMIS: Sr. Nos. Assigned Dates 49,50,51,52,53,56,58,59 23/03/2015 60,61,62,63,64,65,66 24/03/2015 2.If any ad-interim or interim relief granted in any of the above said matters, is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective assigned dates. 3.If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before the Court. Original Common order kept in Sr No. 49) CAC 114/2015 ( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM: K.R. SHRIRAM, J. DATED: MARCH 03, 2015. P.C.: On account of paucity of time, the following matters on the daily board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per CMIS: Sr. Nos. Assigned Dates 49,50,51,52,53,56,58,59 23/03/2015 60,61,62,63,64,65,66 24/03/2015 2.If any ad-interim or interim relief granted in any of the above said matters, is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective assigned dates. 3.If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before the Court. SD/ ( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Date :- 03/03/2015 (Original Common order kept in Sr No. 49) CAC 114/2015) For Regr(J.)

Order - Status 16: CIVIL REVN. APPLICATION NO. 735 OF 2014 Kedarnath Kharban Yadav & ors. … Applicants v/s Smt.Prabhavati wd/o Narayan Laxman Parkar & ors. … Respondents Mr.P.S. Dani, senior advocate i/by V.R.Tripathi for the applicants. Mr.P.G. Karande i/by R.N. Jawal for the respondents. CORAM: N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2015 P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that, even accepting the finding of fact recorded by the Courts below that there was creation of subtenancy in favour of the applicants in the year 1970, the applicants are entitled to the protection of the Act No.18 of 1987 i.e. Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Amendment) Act, 1986. He relied on the decision in the case of (1) Lakhaichand Punamchand Marwadi & ors. v/s Thakurnath Datasaheb Tukaram Barse 1 , (2) Ismail Bhandubhai 1 1992 Bom.R.C. 173 Tamboli v/s Govind Gopalkrishna Bapat & ors . 2 (3) Sadanand Vaikunha Bhende v/s Dr.Gangadhar Subrao Koppikar & ors. 3 ; and (4) Krishnaji Ganesh Vaidya & anr. v/s Smt.Triveniben Anant Virkar Shete & ors . 4 , in support of his submission. 3 Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the applicants have not taken the ground that they are entitled to the protection of the above mentioned position of law and therefore it cannot be accepted in absence of pleadings. He relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of Ganpati Narayan Nikam v/s Ramchandra Bhiku Savant & ors . 5 . However, this decision do not deal with the above mentioned enactment. 4 Arguable questions are raised for consideration. Rule. 5 Learned counsel for the applicants states that the applicants will not create third party rights in the property and they alone are in possession. 6 There shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause ( c). ( N. M. JAMDAR, J. ) 2 1991 Bom.R.C. 415 3 1996 Bom.R.C. 209 4 2002(4) All.MR 757 5 2009(6) Mh.L.J. 948

Order - Status 18: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.735 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL. - II) : 24th February, 2025 DATE None Present. It appears from the office remark that Registrar (Judicial – II) vide order dated 10/02/2025 allowed Interim Application No.535/2025 and permitted the Appellant to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No.3. The learned Advocate for the Appellant was directed to carry out amendment within two weeks and file amended copy of Petition. However, it appears that the learned Advocate for Appellant has neither carried out amendment nor filed amended copy of Civil Revision Application. In such circumstances, the learned Advocate for the Appellant is directed to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No.3 by carrying out amendment as per order dated 10/02/2025 within two weeks and also file amended copy of Civil Revision Application. On failure, proceeding would stand abated against deceased Respondent No.3 – Smt.Priya Eknath Deolekar, without further reference to the Court of Registrar. sd/- Registrar (Judl. - II) dsm

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION. CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.744 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. P. S. Dani for the Applicant. Ms. A. M. Bhambwani for the Respondent. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JUNE 30, 2014 P.C.: Mentioned. Not on board. At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant the matter is taken on board for urgent orders. This Civil Revision Application is filed by the original Defendant Nos.1 and 7 challenging the judgment dated 28th March 2014 passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court, Mumbai directing the Appellant to hand over the vacant and peaceful possession of the Suit premises i.e. Room No.21/22 on the second floor of the building known as Chippi Chawl, sitaute at 3236, Bombay – 400 002 within three months from the date of order to the Plaintiff. The learned counsel for Respondent No.1 original Plaintiff makes a statement that till next date, she will not execute the decree. Statement is accepted. Office is directed to place the matter on board on 30th July 2014. In the meantime, the Applicant is directed to serve the Respondent by way of private notice either by RPAD and/or by hand delivery and to file an affidavit of service to that effect on or before next date. JUDGE

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 744 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr P.S.Dani, Advocate for the applicant. Mr P.S.Dani, Advocate for the applicant. Ms.Asha M. Bhambwani, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 27/08/2014 PC: Not on Board. At the request of Ms. Bhambwani, taken up in the production board. Heard Mr. P.S.Dani, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Asha Bhambwani, learned counsel for the respondent. The learned counsel appearing for the parties state that by order dated 30.7.2014, statement made by learned counsel for respondent no.1-original plaintiff that till next date she will not execute the decree, was accepted and the application was ordered to be listed today for admission. However, the application is not listed for admission till today, ie 27.8.2014. She, therefore, mentions the matter for continuation of the ad-interim order. In view thereof, list the Application for admission on 15.10.2014. In the meantime, the ad-interim order granted on 30.7.2014, shall remain in force. (R.G.KETKAR,J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 23 JUNE 2015. P.C . :- On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Supplementary/ Daily Boards stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date 10, 11,12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 13/07/2015 26, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 14/07/2015 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65 15/07/2015 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 73 16/07/2015 If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (M. S. SONAK, J.)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : JULY 15, 2015 P. C. : On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Supplementary and Daily Boards stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date Daily Board 03/08/15 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 04/08/15 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35. 05/08/15 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46. 06/08/15 If in any of the above matters, adinterim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If adinterim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (M. S. SONAK, J.)

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.744 OF 2014 Himmatlal Chhogalal and Anr. ] … Applicants Versus Vijaysingh Gordhandas and Ors. ] … Respondents Mr. Suresh M. Jain for Applicants. Ms. Asha Bhambwani for Respondents. Mr. Himmatlal Chhogalal, Applicant No.1, present in person. CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 P. C. : The learned Counsel for Applicants, on the basis of instructions from the Applicants, states that they desire to withdraw this Civil Revision Application. Accordingly, leave is granted to withdraw the Civil Revision Application and the same is disposed of as withdrawn. Mr. Himmatlal Chhogalal, Applicant No.1, present in person. Mr. Suresh M. Jain states that he will file Vakalatnama within a period of one week from today. The statement is accepted. (M. S. SONAK, J.) CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Order.