Mulla

Order - Status 6: Shephali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL ST NO. 16008 OF 2014 The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay …Appellant Versus Madanlal Shah & Co & Anr …Respondents Mr UJ Makhija *, i/b Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe, for the Appellant.* Ms Naseem Sumnani *, for Respondent No. 2.* CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 12th July 2017 PC:- 1. Admit. 2. The First Appeal will have to be allowed immediately. The Suit was of 1990. The Plaintiffs sought, by filing an application Exhibit-5, for an adjournment to find documents. The case itself was old and was taken to the City Civil Court from the Bombay High Court where it was originally filed upon a change in the limits of the pecuniary jurisdiction of Courts. The order said that the case was old. Sufficient chances had been given. The suit was dismissed. 3. This was unnecessary. An order of costs would have sufficed. A final opportunity could have been given, making it clear that in default the matter would be dismissed. None of this was done. 4. It is not possible to sustain the impugned order of 18th January 2014. It is set aside. Suit No. 109955 of 1990 (High Court Suit No. 2307 of 1990) is restored to file. 5. Mr Makhija on behalf of the original Plaintiffs states that the Plaintiffs will by 31st August 2017 file all their evidence and documents. They will not seek any adjournment. 6. The First Appeal is disposed of in these terms. There will be no order as to costs. (G. S. PATEL, J)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2513 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.16008 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders. Registrar's orders. – Shri U.J. Makhija along with Roshan Pinto i/by Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt and Caroe for the Applicant. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ DATED : 20TH MARCH 2015 P.C.: . Rule, returnable on 6th May 2015. In addition to the service through Court, private service is permitted. (A.P.BHANGALE, J) (A.S.OKA, J)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2513 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.16008 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Advocate for the R.No.2 Present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, REGISTRAR (JUDL ­ II) Date : 06th May, 2015 Await Service for 6 weeks. sd/­ Registrar (Judl.­ II) dsm – R(J­II) – 06.05.15

Order - Status 9: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2513 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.16008 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Advocate for the Applicant Present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, REGISTRAR (JUDL ­ II) Date : 17th June, 2015 Re­issue Notice to Respondent No.1, returnable after 6 weeks. sd/­ Registrar (Judl.­ II) dsm – R(J­II) – 17.06.15

Order - Status 11: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2513 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.16008 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Advocate for the Appellant Present. Advocate for the Respondent Present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL – II) Date : 29th July, 2015 Await Service for 4 weeks. 67 Registrar (Judl.­II) dsm ­ R(J­II) – 29.07.15

Order - Status 12: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2513 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.16008 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Advocate for the Appellant Present. Advocate for the Respondent No.2 Present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL – II) Date : 26th August, 2015 S.O. to 4 weeks for taking steps as against unserved Respondent No.4. sd/­ Registrar (Judl.­II) dsm – R(J­II) – 26 .08.15

Order - Status 14: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2513 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.16008 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Advocate for the Petitioner Present. Advocate for the Respondent No.2 Present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL – II) Date : 23rd September, 2015 Both Ld. Counsel submits that there is error in office remark about Respondent No.4 instead of Respondent No.1. Order dated 26/08/2015 corrected. S.O. to 4 weeks. sd/­ Registrar (Judl.­II) dsm – R(J­II) – 23.09.15

Order - Status 16: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2513 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.16008 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Advocate for the Appellant Present. Advocate for the Respondent No.2 Present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL – II) Date : 21st October, 2015 S.O. to 4 weeks for taking steps as against unserved Respondent No.1. sd/­ Registrar (Judl.­II) dsm – R(J­II) – 21.10.15

Order - Status 18: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2513 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.16008 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Advocate for the Appellant Present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL – II) Date : 19th January, 2016 Advocate for the Appellant makes statement that he has already filed Affidavit alongwith copies of Newspapers regarding service of Respondent No.1. Office to verify and matter to proceed. sd/­ Registrar (Judl.­II) dsm – R(J­II) – 19.01.16

Order - Status 22: Shephali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2513 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL ST NO. 16008 OF 2014 The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay …Applicant Versus Madanlal Shah & Co & Anr …Respondents Mr UJ Makhija *, i/b Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe, for the Appellant.* Ms Naseem Sumnani *, for Respondent No. 2.* CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 12th July 2017 PC:- 1. There is a delay of 103 days in filing the First Appeal. The delay is sufficiently explained in the Civil Application. It is condoned. 2. The Civil Application is made absolute and disposed of accordingly. No costs. (G. S. PATEL, J) Page 1 of 1 12th July 2017

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 ... ordersOrders. or directions and Registrar's orders. OfficeCourt's Notes, Office Memorada or Judge's Mr. A.K.Abhyankar , P.S.Dani with H.N.Vakil i/b. M/s. Mulla & Mulla for the petitioners. Shri R.D.Rane GP for Respdt.5. CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.M.KANADE, J. DTAED: 11TH AUGUST, 2006. P.C. To Rule. 1. be heard with W.P. of 2003. No.2697 . Status Status-quo wi continued be with liberty to get ers in interim or appropriate interim orders in in this case.

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4503 OF 2006 TATA MOTORS LIMITED )...PETITIONER V/s. PIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUNICIPAL CORP. ) AND ORS. )...RESPONDENTS Mr.H.N.Vakil i/b. M/s.Mulla & Mulla and Craigie Blunt and Caroe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.S.B.Kalel, AGP for the Respondent State. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & A. M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 14th JULY 2017 P.C. : 1 Issue fresh notice to respondent nos.1 to 4, returnable on 11th August 2017. The learned AGP appears for respondent no.5. (A. M. BADAR, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA), J.)

Order - Status 11: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Rushi Mathur instructed by M/s Mulla and Mulla Co. and Craige Blunt and Caroe is present. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) Date : 13 SEPTEMBER 2017 Await service to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 for four weeks i.e. 11.10.2017. S.O. to 12.10.2017. REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) RJ I gpj / 13.09.2017

Order - Status 13: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. H.W. Vakil a/w Ms. S.M. Vakil and Mr. Andre Shah instructed by Mulla and Mulla CBC, Advocate for Petitioner is present. CORAM :A.N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) Date : 12 OCTOBER 2017 Await service to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 for four weeks (excluding diwali vacation) i.e. 23.11.2017. S.O. to 24.11.2017. REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) RJ I gpj / 12.10.2017

Order - Status 31: VAI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 Tata Motors Limited …Petitioner Versus Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation And Ors. ..Respondents Mr P. S. Dani, Senior Advocate , a/w Mr. H. N. Vakil a/w Mr. Samkit Shah i/by Mulla and Mulla and Craigie Blunt & Caroe for the Petitioner. Ms S. S. Bhende , A.G.P. for the Respondent – State. CORAM: M.S. Sonak & Kamal Khata, JJ DATED: 27th August 2024 PC:- 1. Place this matter along with Writ Petition No.2697 of 2003 on 19th November 2024. If full Bench has decided earlier, liberty to apply. (Kamal Khata, J) (M.S. Sonak, J) VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2024.08.30 12:04:10 +0530

Order - Status 33: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 _______ _______ Tata Motors Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents None for Petitioner. Ms. M. P. Thakur, AGP for State. CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATE: 27 JUNE 2025 P.C. None for the petitioner. As a matter of last chance, stand over to 04 July 2025. In the event, the petitioner is not represented on the adjourned date of hearing, there shall be no alternative but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 _________ __________ Tata Motors Limited ...Petitioner Vs. Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents None for the Petitioner. Ms. S. A. Prabhune, AGP for the Respondent-State. CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATE: 04 JULY 2025. MUGDHA MANOJ PARANJAPE Digitally signed by MUGDHA MANOJ PARANJAPE Date: 2025.07.07 12:09:33 +0530 P.C. On 27th June 2025 we had passed the following order :- "1. None for the petitioner. As a matter of last chance, stand over to 04 July 2025. In the event, the petitioner is not represented on the adjourned date of hearing, there shall be no alternative but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution." Today again the Petitioner is not represented. Considering our aforesaid order, it clearly appears that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this Petition. It is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2013 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 288 OF 2008 :­ APPLICANTS :­ RESPONDENTS :- Mr. Agnel Carneivo, i/b. M/s. Mulla and Mulla and CBC for the Applicants. Mr. Pravin Kamble, for Respondent Nos. 2A, 2C to 2E. Mr. Mohan B. Jadhav, for Respondent Nos. 3 to 6B. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATED : JUNE 28, 2013 P.C. : Heard Mr. Agnel Carneivo, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants. Issue notice to the heirs of Respondent No. 2B, returnable on 12th July, 2013. In addition to service of notice through Court, the advocate for the Applicants may serve a private notice by Registered Post A.D. and/or by Courier service and/or by hand delivery to the heirs of Respondent No. 2B and shall file affidavit of service before the returnable date. (R. M. SAVANT, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2013 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 288 OF 2008 Nozer Sheriyar Mazda and Ors. : Applicants versus Gulab Shankar Dangat and Ors. : Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 830 OF 2013 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 803 OF 2001 Mr. Agnel Carneivo, i/b. M/s. Mulla and Mulla and CBC, for the Applicants. Mr. Anup Lahoti, for Respondent Nos. 2(B1) to 2(B3). Mr. Pravin V. Kamble, with Mr. Sharan Patole, for Respondent Nos. 2A to 2E in Second Appeal. Mr. Samrat K. Shinde, i/b. Mr. Tejas Deshpande, for Respondent Nos. 7 and 8. Mr. S. P. Joshi, for Respondent No. 1 in Second Appeal. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATED : JULY 19, 2013 P.C. : At the request of Shri. Lahoti appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2(B1) to 2(B3), adjourned to 23rd July, 2013. The parties to note that no further adjournment would be granted. (R. M. SAVANT, J.)

Order - Status 12: can-20-13.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.20 OF 2013 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.288 of 2008 Nozer Shriyar Mazda & Ors. : Applicants versus Gulab Shankar Dangat & Ors. : Respondents Mr. Agnel Carneivo i/b Mulla & Mulla CBC for the Applicants Mr. Mohan Jadhav for the Respondent Nos.3 to 6(B) Mr. Pravin Kamble for the Respondent Nos.2A, 2C to 2E Mr. T. D. Deshmukh for the Respondent Nos.7 and 8 CORAM: R M SAVANT, J DATED : 23rd JULY, 2013. P.C. 1 The above Civil Application has been filed for bringing the heirs of the Respondent No.2(B) on record who are the Respondent Nos.2B1 to 2B3. In so far as the said heirs are concerned, they are represented by Mr. Lahoti whose appearance is shown on the cause list. The above Civil Application had appeared on 1972013 when at the request of Mr. Lahoti it was specifically adjourned for today, however today Mr. Lahoti has not appeared though the matter has been called out twice. This Court had made it clear on the last occasion that no further adjournment would be granted. The cause for filing the above Civil Application so as to join the heirs of the Respondent No.2(B) as party Respondent is to facilitate the execution of the cancellation deed for cancelling the sale deed dated 217 2006. The Respondent No.2(A) to 2(E) have executed the sale deed dated 2162006 in favour of the Respondent Nos.7 and 8 which according to the Petitioners in the above Contempt Petition is in breach and violation of the order dated 2812002 passed in the above Second Appeal, by which order the parties were directed not to create third party rights in respect of the suit property. When the above Contempt Petition had come up before a Learned Single Judge of this Court on 2642013, the Learned Judge was informed by the parties that the Respondent Nos.2(A) to 2(E) would execute a cancellation deed cancelling the said sale deed dated 2172006, the order passed on the said day discloses that a draft of the cancellation deed was also produced before the Court. Since the Respondent No.2(B) has expired after the said sale deed was executed, the cancellation deed cannot be effectively executed without bringing the heirs of the Respondent No.2(B) on record. As indicated above inspite of the matter being adjourned at the request of Mr. Lahoti, no appearance is put up for the heirs today. The Civil Application is accordingly allowed, resultantly the heirs of the Respondent No.2(B) i.e. Respondent No.2B1, 2B2 and 2B3 are allowed to be brought on record of the Contempt Petition. Amendment can-20-13.sxw to be carried out within one week. Amended copy to be served on the concerned Advocates. The Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. 2 The parties have also agreed to cancel the partition deed between the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2(A) to 2(E), it seems that an undertaking to that effect was given before this Court which has been recorded in the order dated 2232013. 3 Since the impediment of the heirs of the Respondent No.2(B) being not on record has now been removed. It is expected of the parties that they would execute the deed of cancellation of the sale deed as well as the deed of cancellation of the unregistered partition deed within one week of the time elapsing for carrying out the amendment, and report to this Court on the next date. The Contempt Petition is adjourned to 13th August, 2013. (R M SAVANT, J)