Kmc Legal Venture

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8636 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1229 OF 2022 Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. … Applicant In the matter between : Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. … Appellant Versus Vaishali Vijay Shinde and Ors. Respondents Mr. Nikhil Mehta i/b. KMC Legal Venture, Advocate for the Applicant. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 6th MAY, 2024. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that appeal be restored as applicant do not want to withdraw the appeal. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the applicant and reasons mentioned in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) and disposed of. Applicant to take necessary steps within four weeks. The Appeal is restored to file. SONALI SATISH KILAJE Digitally signed by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date: 2024.05.09 12:11:58 +0530 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 1/1

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8634 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 13605 OF 2024 Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation … Applicant In the matter between :- Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation … Appellant vs. Janhavi Jeevankumar @ Jeevan Gurao and Ors. … Respondents ***** Mr. Rananaware Dananjayrao :- Advocate for Applicant. Adv. U. B. Nighot :- Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Adv. Amol Gatane i/b. Adv. Swati U. Mehta :- Advocate for Respondent No. 4. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER 2024 P. C. :- Heard learned Advocate for Appellant and learned Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and learned Advocate for Respondent No. 4. There is delay while preferring Appeal. Delay is opposed. 2. For the reasons stated in the Application, it is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of. [S. M. MODAK, J.]